Skip to main content
Log in

Technology adoption and mitigation of invasive species damage and risk: application to zebra mussels

  • Published:
Journal of Bioeconomics

Abstract

Using a bio-economic model of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha), we examine the expected economic value of prevention, control and eradication alternatives for the freshwater mussel in Lake Okeechobee (Florida, USA). We include two emerging technologies for zebra mussel (ZM) control: (1) a natural pesticide called Zequanox, and (2) hot wash stations at boat ramps. We employ water management district data, user data collected via a phone survey, and mitigation expenditures from infested locations elsewhere to estimate the potential damage from the introduction of zebra mussels in Florida. Methods used include static cost transfer estimation, econometric cost estimation, and stochastic-dynamic simulation. We use our bio-economic model to compare costs and risks with and without the emerging technologies. We also consider the impact of technology adoption rates by anglers, management policy efficacy, and opportunity costs associated with ZM control. Results indicate that, without investment in prevention, there is a very high probability that Florida waterways will be infested with zebra mussels by year 2025, and expected environmental damages and management costs are high. Slow response due to poor detection methods or insufficient control efforts will lead to a moderate probability of a significant infestation. Rapid reaction and enhanced prevention efforts are expected to greatly reduce the probability of ZM infesting Lake Okeechobee by 2025, and to generate much higher expected net benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, D. C. (2007). Economics and law of invasive species management in Florida. PhD Dissertation, University of Florida. Gainesville, FL.

  • Adams D. C., Lee D. J. (2007) Estimating the value of invasive aquatic plant control: A bioeconomic analysis of 13 public lakes in Florida. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39: 97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossenbroek J. M., Kraft C. E., Nekola J. C. (2001) Prediction of long-distance dispersal using gravity models: Zebra mussel invasion of inland lakes. Ecological Applications 11(6): 1778–1788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhle E. R., Margolis M., Ruesink J. L. (2005) Bang for buck: Cost-effective control of invasive species with different life histories. Ecological Economics 52: 355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey F., Bowden K., Macdonald L., Kroeger T. (2008) A preliminary assessment of the economic benefits of land conservation areas in Florida. Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Clean Boats Clean Waters. (2010). Help stop aquatic hitchhikers. Brochure WT-801. University of Wisconsin Extension. http://www.uwsp.edu/cnr/uwexlakes/cbcw/Pubs/hitchhiker.pdf

  • Costanza R., d’Arge R., deGroot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B. et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y. (1996). Present and expected economic costs of zebra mussel damages to water users with Great Lakes intakes. PhD Dissertation, The Ohio State University. Columbus, OH.

  • Dow, S. (2009). Introducing an environmentally safe and operator friendly invasive mussel control strategy. Mississippi river Basin panel meeting, September 29–30, 2009.

  • Finnoff D., Shogren J. F., Leung B., Lodge D. (2005) The importance of bioeconomic feedback in invasive species management. Ecological Economics 52: 367–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Division of Water Resource Management. (2001). Basin status report—Lake Okeechobee. Tallahassee, Florida.

  • Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Upland Invasive Exotic Plant Management Program. (2006). Annual report, 2005–2006, Tallahassee, FL.

  • GAMS Development Corporation. (2009). GAMS, Washington, DC.

  • Hayward, D., & Estevez, E. D. (1997). Suitability of Florida waters to invasion by the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Technical Report No. 495, Mote Marine Laboratory.

  • Jensen, D. (2009). Boat washing stations—Palliative or cure? Presentation at the 16th Annual ICAIS, Montreal, Canada. http://www.icais.org/pdf/2009abstracts/Douglas_Jensen.pdf. Accessed April 17, 2010.

  • Johnson L. E., Carlton J. T. (1996) Post-establishment spread in large-scale invasions: Dispersal mechanisms of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha. Ecology 77(6): 1686–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L. E., Padilla D. K. (1996) Geographic spread of exotic species: Ecological lessons and opportunities from the invasion of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha. Biological Conservation 78: 23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim C. S., Lee D. J., Schaible G. S., Vasavada U. (2007) Multiregional invasive species management: Theory and an application to Florida’s exotic plants. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39: 111–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee D. J., Adams D. C., Kim C. S. (2009) Managing invasive plants on public conservation forestlands: Application of a bio-economic model. Forest Policy and Economics 11(4): 237–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee D. J., Adams D. C., Rossi F. (2007) Optimal management of a potential invader: The case of zebra mussels in Florida. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39: 69–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung B., Lodge D. M., Finnoff D., Shogren J. F., Lewis M. A., Lamberti G. (2002) An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: Bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proceeding of the Royal Society Biological Studies 269: 2407–2413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack R. N., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W. M., Evans H., Clout M., Bazzaz F. A. (2000) Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10(3): 689–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milon J. W., Scrogin D. (2006) Latent preferences and valuation of wetland ecosystem restoration. Ecological Economics 56(2): 162–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. (2009). Great Lakes’ invasion goes national, March 3.

  • O’Neill C. R. Jr. (1997) Economic impact of zebra mussels—Results of the 1995 National Zebra Mussel Information Clearinghouse study. Great Lakes Research Review 3: 35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S., Darland, T., & Systsma, M. (2005). Potential economic impacts of zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River Basin. Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission.

  • Protect Your Waters. (2010). Protect your waters and stop aquatic hitchhikers! http://www.protectyourwaters.net/

  • Riccciardi A., Neves R. J., Rasmussen J. B. (1998) Impending extinctions of North American freshwater mussels (Unionoida) following the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) invasion. Journal of Animal Ecology 67: 613–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothlisberger, J. D. (2009). Human-mediated dispersal of aquatic nonindigenous species: Impacts and interventions. PhD Dissertation, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana.

  • U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2006). USGS real-time water data for florida. http://waterdata.usgs.gov/fl/nwis/rt

  • Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF). (2007). Millbrook quarry zebra mussel eradication. http://www.dgif.state.va.us/zebramussels/

  • Wiggin, J., Uiterwyk, K., Hellin, D., Bordner, D., & Alpert, L. (2009). Florida boating access facilities inventory and economic study. Urban Harbors Institute. http://www.uhi.umb.edu/pdf_files/Florida/Final%20Florida%20Boating%20Access%20Facilities%20Report%20August%202009.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damian C. Adams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adams, D.C., Lee, D.J. Technology adoption and mitigation of invasive species damage and risk: application to zebra mussels. J Bioecon 14, 21–40 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-011-9117-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-011-9117-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation