Abstract
Invasions by non-indigenous plant species pose serious economic threats to Australian agricultural industries. When a new invader is identified a rapid response is critical, particularly if the invasive species has the ability to spread rapidly. An early decision is required whether to attempt to eradicate or contain the infestation, or do nothing and leave it to landholders to manage. These decisions should be based on economic considerations that account for long term benefits and costs. This paper describes a bioeconomic simulation framework with a mathematical model representing weed spread linked to a dynamic programming model to provide a means of determining the economically optimal weed management strategies over time, from the government’s perspective. The modelling framework is used to evaluate hypothetical case study invasive weed control scenarios in the Australian cropping systems. The benefit–cost ratios of invasion control are shown to be generally very high and clearly, there are significant benefits to be achieved by controlling highly invasive weeds when initial infestations are at a low level. Even if the invasion cannot be eradicated due to its high invasiveness or budget constraints, it still pays to maintain invasions at low levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldrich R. J. (1984) Weed-crop ecology: Principles in weed management. Breton Publishers, North Scituate, MA
Auld B. A., Coote B. G. (1980) A model of a spreading plant population. Oikos 34: 287–292
Auld B. A., Coote B. G. (1981) Prediction of pasture invasion by Nassella trichotoma (Gramineae) in south-east Australia. Protection Ecology 3: 271–277
Auld B. A., Coote B. G. (1990) INVADE: Towards the simulation of plant spread. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 30: 121–128
Bellman R. E. (1957) Dynamic programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Cacho O.J. (2004) When is it optimal to eradicate a weed invasion?. In: Sindel B.M., Johnson S.B. (eds) 14th Australian Weeds Conference papers & proceedings, 6–9 September 2004. Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia, pp 49–54
Cacho O. J., Spring D., Pheloung P., Hester S. (2006) Evaluating the feasibility of eradicating an invasion. Biological Invasions 8: 903–917
Clark C. W. (1990) Mathematical bioeconomics: The optimal management of renewable resources, (2nd ed.). Wiley, New York, USA
Cousens R. (1985) An empirical model relating crop yield to weed and crop density and a statistical comparison with other models. The Journal of Agricultural Science 105: 513–521
Cousens R., Mortimer M. (1995) Dynamics of weed populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Crawley M. J. (1986) The population biology of invaders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 314: 711–731
Diggle A. J., Neve P. B., Smith F. P. (2003) Herbicides used in combination can reduce the probability of herbicide resistance in finite weed populations. Weed Research 43: 371–382
Diggle A. J., Salam M. U., Thomas G. J., Yang H. A., O’Connell M., Sweetingham M. W. (2002) Anthracnose tracer: A spatiotemporal model for simulating the spread of anthracnose in a lupin field. Phytopathology 92(10): 1110–1119
Doyle C. J. (1997) A review of the use of models of weed control in integrated crop protection. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 64: 165–172
Fisher B. S., Lee R. R. (1981) A dynamic programming approach to the economic control of weed and disease infestations. Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics 49: 175–187
Gorddard R. J., Pannell D. J., Hertzler G. (1995) An optimal control model for integrated weed management under herbicide resistance. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 39(1): 71–87
Gorddard R. J., Pannell D. J., Hertzler G. (1996) Economic evaluation of strategies for management of herbicide resistance. Agricultural Systems 51: 281–298
Hanski I. (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396: 41–49
Higgins S. I., Richardson D. M. (1996) A review of models of alien plant spread. Ecological Modelling 87: 249–265
Higgins S. I., Richardson D. M. (1999) Predicting plant migration rates in a changing world: The role of long-distance dispersal. American Naturalist 153: 464–475
Higgins S. I., Richardson D. M., Cowling R. M. (1996) Modelling invasive plant spread: The role of plant-environment interactions and model structure. Ecology 77: 2043–2054
Jayasuriya, R. T., & Jones, R. E. (2008). A bioeconomic model for determining the optimal response to a new weed incursion in Australian cropping systems. Paper presented to the 52nd Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, 5–8 February, Canberra, ACT, Australia. Available: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/6015/2/cp08ja01.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2009.
Jayasuriya R.T., van de Ven R., Jones R.E. (2008) Spatial modelling of new weed incursions in cropping systems. In: Klinken R.D., Osten V.A., Panetta F.D., Scanlan J.C. (eds) 16th Australian Weeds Conference Proceedings, 18–22 May 2008. Cairns, North Queensland, Australia, pp 54–56
Jayasuriya, R. T., Jones, R. E., & van de Ven, R. (2008b). An economic decision tool for responding to new weed incursion risks in the Australian grains industry. Technical Series No 14, CRC for Australian Weed Management, Adelaide, Australia. ISBN: 978-1-920932-67-1. Available: http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/4503490. Accessed 12 May 2009.
Jones R. (2004) The economic benefits of IWM: the role of risk and sustainability in farming systems. In: Sindel B.M., Johnson S.B. (eds) 14th Australian Weeds Conference papers & proceedings, 6–9 September 2004. Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia, pp 576–579
Jones R., Medd R. (1997) Economic analysis of integrated management of wild oats involving fallow, herbicide and crop rotational options. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 37: 683–691
Jones R. E., Medd R. W. (2000) Economic thresholds and the case for longer term approaches to population management of weeds. Weed Technology 14: 337–350
Martin A. R., Mortensen D. A., Lindquist J. L. (1998) Decision support models for weed management: In-field management tools. In: Hatfield J. L., Buhler D. D., Stewart B. A. (eds) Integrated weed and soil management. Ann Arbor Press, Michigan, IN, pp 363–369
Monjardino M., Diggle A., Moore J. (2004) What is the impact of harvesting technology on the spread of new weeds in cropping systems?. In: Sindel B.M., Johnson S.B. (eds) 14th Australian Weeds Conference papers & proceedings, 6–9 September 2004. Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia, pp 580–583
Okubo A. (1980) Diffusion and ecological problems: Mathematical models. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Pandey S., Medd R. W. (1990) Integration of seed and plant kill tactics for control of wild oats: An economic evaluation. Agricultural Systems 34(1): 65–76
Pandey S., Medd R. W. (1991) A stochastic dynamic programming framework for weed control decision making: An application to Avena fatua L. Agricultural Economics 6(2): 115–128
Possingham H. P. (1996) Decision theory and biodiversity management: How to manage a metapopulation. In: Floyd R. B., Sheppard A. W., De Barro P. J. (eds) Frontiers of population ecology. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, pp 391–398
Schweizer E. E., Lybecker D. W., Wiles L. J. (1998) Important biological information needed for bioeconomic weed management models. In: Hatfield J. L., Buhler D. D., Stewart B. A. (eds) Integrated weed and soil management. Ann Arbor Press, Michigan, IN, pp 1–24
Sharov A. A., Liebhold A. M. (1998) Bioeconomics of managing the spread of exotic pest species with barrier zones. Ecological Applications 8(3): 833–845
Sinden, J., Jones, R., Hester, S., Odom, D., Kalisch, C., James, R., & Cacho, O. (2004). The economic impact of weeds in Australia. CRC for Australian Weed Management, Technical Series, No 8, CRC for Australian Weed Management, Adelaide, Australia. ISBN: 978-1-920932-67-1. Available: http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/3107287. Accessed 10 March 2009.
Tayler C. R., Burt O. R. (1984) Near optimal management strategies for controlling wild oats in spring wheat. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 50–60
Woolcock J. L., Cousens R. (2000) A mathematical analysis of factors affecting the rate of spread of patches of annual weeds in an arable field. Weed Science 48: 27–34
Zimdahl R. L. (1980) Weed-crop competition: A review. International Plant Protection Center, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jayasuriya, R.T., Jones, R.E. & van de Ven, R. A bioeconomic model for determining the optimal response strategies for a new weed incursion. J Bioecon 13, 45–72 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-010-9097-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-010-9097-2