Food security implications of global marine catch losses due to overfishing
- 2.1k Downloads
Excess fishing capacity and the growth in global demand for fishery products have made overfishing ubiquitous in the world’s oceans. Here we describe the potential catch losses due to unsustainable fishing in all countries’ exclusive economic zones (EEZs) and on the high seas over 1950–2004. To do so, we relied upon catch and price statistics from the Sea Around Us Project as well as an empirical relationship we derived from species stock assessments by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. In 2000 alone, estimated global catch losses amounted to 7–36% of the actual tonnage landed that year, resulting in a landed value loss of between $6.4 and 36 billion (in 2004 constant US$). From 1950–2004, 36–53% of commercial species in 55–66% of EEZs may have been overfished. Referring to a species-level database of intrinsic vulnerability (V) based on life-history traits, it appears that susceptible species were depleted quickly and serially, with the average V of potential catch losses declining at a similar rate to that of actual landings. The three continental regions to incur greatest losses by mass were Europe, North America, and Asia—forming a geographic progression in time. But low-income and small island nations, heavily dependent on marine resources for protein, were impacted most profoundly. Our analysis shows that without the inexorable march of overfishing, ~20 million people worldwide could have averted undernourishment in 2000. For the same year, total catch in the waters of low-income food deficit nations might have been up to 17% greater than the tonnage actually landed there. The situation may be worst for Africa, which in our analysis registered losses of about 9–49% of its actual catches by mass in year 2000, thus seriously threatening progress towards the UN Millennium Development Goals.
KeywordsCatch loss Food security Undernourishment Landed values
JEL ClassificationQ22 D57
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Agnew, D. J., Pearce, J., Pramod, G., Peatman, T., Watson, R., Beddington, J. R., & Pitcher, T. J. (2009). Estimating the worldwide extent of illegal fishing. PLoS ONE, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004570.
- Alverson, D. L., Freeberg, M. H., Pope, J. G., & Murawski, S. A. (1994). A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 339, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome (Italy), 233 pp.Google Scholar
- Black, R. (2007). Last rites for a marine marvel? BBC News website. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7040011.stm. Accessed May 15, 2009.
- CCAMLR (Convention on the conservation of Antarctic marine living resources) (2009). http://www.ccamlr.org/. Accessed May 2 , 2009.
- Christy, F. T. (1997): Economic waste in fisheries: Impediments to change and conditions for improvement. In E. K. Pikitch, D. D. Huppert, & M. P. Sissenwine (Eds.), Proceedings from the 20th American Fisheries Society symposium: Global trends—Fisheries management, 14–16 June 1994, Seattle, WA. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, pp. 28–39.Google Scholar
- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). (2010). http://www.cites.org/. Accessed February 2, 2010.
- Environmental Justice Foundation (EJF): (2009) Dirty fish: How EU hygiene standards facilitate illegal fishing in West Africa. EJF, LondonGoogle Scholar
- FAO. (2005). Fisheries topics: Utilization. Nutritional elements of fish. Text by Lahsen Ababouch. Rome: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department [online], Updated 27 May 2005. http://www.fao.org/fishery/topic/12319/en. Accessed June 18, 2009.
- FAO. (2008). FAOSTAT Statistics Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx. Accessed December 1, 2008.
- FAO.: (2009) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2008. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
- FAO. (2010). Report of the third FAO Expert Advisory Panel for the assessment of proposals to amend appendices I and II of CITES concerning commerically-exploited aquatic Sp. Rome, 7–12 December (2009).Google Scholar
- Froese, R., & Kesner-Reyes, K. (2002). Impact of fishing on the abundance of marine species, Vol. 12. ICES Council Meeting Report CM 12/L:12, International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
- Garcia, S. M. (2009). Rising to depletion? Towards a dialogue on the state of national marine fisheries. Prepared for the Global Program on Fisheries (PROFISH). Preliminary Report. April 2009 (Version2). Agriculture and Rural Development Department. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
- Garcia, S. M., & Newton, C. H. (1997). Current situation, trends, and prospects in world capture fisheries. In E. K. Pikitch, D. D. Huppert & M. P. Sissenwine (Eds.), Global trends: fisheries management, pp. 2–27. Proceedings of the American Fisheries Society Symposium 20, Seattle, USA, 14–16 June 1994. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society.Google Scholar
- Garcia, S. M., & Grainger, J. R. (2005). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. Biological Sciences, 360, 21–46.Google Scholar
- Gascuel D., Zeller D., Taleb Sidi M.O., Pauly D. (2007) Reconstructed catches in the Mauritanian EEZ. In: Zeller D., Pauly D. (eds) Reconstruction of marine fisheries catches for key countries and regions (1950–2005). Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, pp 105–120Google Scholar
- Grainger, R. J. (1999). Global trends in fisheries and aquaculture. In National Ocean Service, NOAA, Center for the Study of Marine Policy at the University of Delaware, The Ocean Governance Group. Trends and future challenges for US National Ocean and Coastal Policy: Workshop materials. Washington, DC, pp. 21–25.Google Scholar
- Grainger, R. J., & Garcia, S. M. (1996). Chronicles of marine fishery landings (1950–1994): Trend analysis and fisheries potential. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 359. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- Gulland J. A. (1971). The fish resources of the ocean. Fishing News (Books), West Byfleet.Google Scholar
- Hilborn R., Walters C. J. (1992) Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: Choice, dynamics and uncertainty. Chapman & Hall, New York, p 570Google Scholar
- Kelleher, K. (2005). Discards in the World’s marine fisheries: An update. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 470, FAO, Rome. 131 p.Google Scholar
- Klyashtorin, L. B. (2001). Climate change and long-term fluctuations of commercial catches. The possibility of forecasting. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 410, FAO, Rome. 86 p.Google Scholar
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA): (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: Current state and trends: Findings of the condition and trends working group. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Pramod, G., Pitcher, T. J., Pearce, J., & Agnew, D. (2008). Sources of information supporting estimates of unreported fishery catches (IUU) for 59 Countries and the high seas. Fisheries Centre Research Reports 16 No. 4.Google Scholar
- Srinivasan U. T., Carey S. P., Hallstein E., Higgins P. A., Kerr A. C., Koteen L. E., Smith A. B., Watson R., Harte J., Norgaard R. B. (2008) The debt of nations and the distribution of ecological impacts from human activities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 1768–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sumaila, U. R., & Hannesson, R. (in press). Is MSY=MEY? Fish and Fisheries.Google Scholar
- Sumaila, U. R., & Suatoni, L. (2006). Economic benefits of Rebuilding U.S. ocean fish populations. Fisheries Centre Working Paper #2006-04, Vancouver, BC: The University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
- Sumaila, U. R., Khan, A. S., Dyck, A. J., Watson, R., Munro, G., Tydemers, P., & Pauly, D. (in press). A bottom-up re-estimation of global fisheries subsidies. Journal of Bioeconomics.Google Scholar
- United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2002). Integrated assessment of trade liberalization and trade-related policies: A country study on the fisheries sector in Senegal. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC). (2010). Status of Fishery Resources off the Northeastern United States. http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/sos/.
- Walters C., Maguire J.-J. (1996) Lessons for stock assessment from the Northern Cod collapse. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 6: 125–137Google Scholar
- World Bank & FAO. (2009). Sunken billions: The economic justification for fisheries reform: Case study summaries. Permanent URL:http://go.worldbank.org/MGUTHSY7U0. Accessed April 15, 2009.
- Worm B., Hilborn R., Baum J.K., Branch T.A., Collie J.S., Costello C., Fogarty M.J., Fulton E.A., Hutchings J.A., Jennings S., Jensen O.P., Lotze H.K., Mace P.M., McClanahan T.R., Minto C., Palumbi S.R., Parma A.M., Ricard D., Rosenberg A.A., Watson R., Zeller D. (2009) Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 325: 578–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar