Skip to main content

Economic impact of ocean fish populations in the global fishery

Abstract

Our goal in this paper is to estimate the total output in an economy that is currently dependent (at least partially) on current fisheries output. We therefore applied the Leontief technological coefficients at current production and then estimate total output supported throughout the economy at the current level of production. Estimates of gross revenue from capture fisheries suggest that the direct value of output for this sector is US $80–85 billion annually (Sumaila et al., Journal of Bioeconomics 9(1):39–51, 2007; Willmann et al., The Sunken Billions, World Bank, FAO, Washington DC, Rome, 2009). However, as a primary or a potential economic base industry, there are a vast number of secondary economic activities—from boat building to international transport—that are supported by world fisheries, yet these related activities are rarely considered when evaluating the economic impact of fisheries. This study applies an input–output methodology to estimate the total direct, indirect, and induced impact of marine capture fisheries on the world economy. While results suggest that there is a great deal of variation in fishing output multipliers between regions and countries, when we apply the output multipliers to the capture fisheries sector at the global level, we find that significant indirect and induced effects place the impact of this sector to world output nearly three times larger than the value of landings at first sale, at between US $225 and 240 billion per year.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Béné C., Macfadyen G., Allison E. H. (2007) Increasing the contribution of small-scale fisheries to poverty alleviation and food security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat M. G., Bhatta R. (2006) Regional economic impacts of limited entry fishery management: An application of dynamic input–output model. Environment and Development Economics 11(6): 709–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christ, C. F. (1955). A review of input–output analysis. In Input–output analysis: An appraisal (pp. 137–182). UMI. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2866.

  • de Mesnard L. (2002) Note about the concept of net multipliers. Journal of Regional Science 42(3): 545–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Mesnard L. (2006) A critical comment on Oosterhaven–Stelder net multipliers. The Annals of Regional Science 41(2): 249–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietzenbacher E. (2005) More on multipliers. Journal of Regional Science 45(2): 421–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heen K. (1989) Impact analysis of multispecies marine resource management. Marine Resource Economics 6(4): 331–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland, P., Jin, D., Thunberg, E., & Steinback, S. (2005). Economic activity associated with the northeast shelf large marine ecosystem: Application of an input–output approach. In Sustaining large marine ecosystems: The human dimension (pp. 159–181). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Jin D., Hoagland P., Dalton T. M. (2003) Linking economic and ecological models for a marine ecosystem. Ecological Economics 46(3): 367–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontief W. (1953) Domestic production and foreign trade: The American capital position re-examined. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 97(4): 332–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief W. (1966) Input–output economics. Oxford University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief W., Morgan A., Polenske K., Simpson D., Tower E. (1965) The economic impact—industrial and regional—of an arms cut. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47: 217–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung P., Pooley S. (2001) Regional economic impacts of reductions in fisheries production: A supply-driven approach. Marine Resource Economics 16(4): 251–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveridge S. (2004) A typology and assessment of multi-sector regional economic impact models. Regional Studies 38(3): 305–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhaven J. (2006) The net multiplier is a new key sector indicator: Reply to de Mesnard’s comment. The Annals of Regional Science 41(2): 273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhaven J., Stelder D. (2002) Net multipliers avoid exaggerating impacts: With a bi-regional illustration for the Dutch transportation sector. Journal of Regional Science 42(3): 533–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontecorvo G., Wilkinson M., Anderson R., Holdowsky M. (1980) Contribution of the ocean sector to the united states economy. Science 208(4447): 1000–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radtke, H. D., Carter, C. N., & Davis, S. W. (2004). Economic evaluation of the northern pikeminnow management program. Report prepared for Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission.

  • Roy N., Arnason R., Schrank W. E. (2009) The identification of economic base industries, with an application to the Newfoundland fishing industry. Land Economics 85(4): 675–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Seung C. K., Waters E. C. (2006) A review of regional economic models for fisheries management in the U.S. Marine Resource Economics 21(1): 101–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumaila U. R., Marsden A. D., Watson R., Pauly D. (2007) A global ex-vessel fish price database: Construction and applications. Journal of Bioeconomics 9(1): 39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmann, R., Kelleher, K., Arnason, R., & Franz, N. (2009). The sunken billions. Washington DC; Rome: World Bank; FAO.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Dyck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dyck, A.J., Sumaila, U.R. Economic impact of ocean fish populations in the global fishery. J Bioecon 12, 227–243 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-010-9088-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-010-9088-3

Keywords

  • Fisheries
  • Input–output
  • World economy
  • Economic impact

JEL Classification

  • Q22
  • D57
  • F01
  • L79