Skip to main content
Log in

Coevolution of product quality and consumer preferences

  • Published:
Journal of Bioeconomics Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper seeks to analyze the self-reinforcing coevolutionary process of innovation on the basis of the framework of evolutionary ecology and population genetics. Particularly central to this analysis is “Fisher’s runaway process,” which explains the coevolution of product quality and consumer preference in the supply–demand context. This paper puts forward the following main points. First, we can conclude from a matching model of supply and demand that when a consumer who prefers high-quality products discovers such a product in the market, he/she will certainly purchase that product. Second, taking into account both the high survival rate of a firm that supplies a high-quality product and the cost incurred by the firm in improving product quality, we arrive at an evolutionarily stable Fisher’s process. The third point, however, considers the disutility of a consumer with an inordinately high quality preference; in this case, Fisher’s process disappears. Fourth, it is possible to recover Fisher’s process if we consider the existence of power users or the effect of the negative bias of innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen B. (2001) Technological change and the evolution of corporate innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E. S. (1994) Evolutionary economics: Post-Schumpeterian contributions. Pinter Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock D. C. (eds) (2006) Understanding Moore’s law: Four decades of innovation. Chemical Heritage Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer M. G. (1985) The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen C. M., Bower J. L. (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal 17: 197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen C. M., Verlinden M., Westerman G. (2002) Disruption, disintegration and the dissipation of differentiability. Industrial Corporate Change 11: 955–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G. (2000) Innovation, organization and economic dynamics. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer D. S. (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R. A. (1915) The evolution of sexual preferences. Eugenics Review 7: 184–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson G. M. (1994) Economics and evolution: Bringing life back into economics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa Y., Pomiankowski A., Nee S. (1991) The evolution of costly mate preference II. Evolution 45: 1431–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R. (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of Natural Academic Science of the U.S.A. 78: 3721–3725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E. (1976) Evolution and the diversity of life: Selected essays. Harvard University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe J. S. (1998) Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R., Winter S. (1984) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomiankowski A., Iwasa Y., Nee S. (1991) The evolution of costly mate preference I. Evolution 45: 1422–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlfs J. H. (2001) Bandwagon effects in high-technology industries. The MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundbo J. (1998) The theory of innovation: Entrepreneurs, technology and strategy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadman W. M. (2000) Variable quality in consumer theory: Toward a dynamic microeconomic theory of the consume. M.E. Sharpe Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt U. (1993) Evolutionary economics. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takanori Ida.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ida, T. Coevolution of product quality and consumer preferences. J Bioecon 12, 101–117 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-010-9083-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-010-9083-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation