Abstract
This paper seeks to analyze the self-reinforcing coevolutionary process of innovation on the basis of the framework of evolutionary ecology and population genetics. Particularly central to this analysis is “Fisher’s runaway process,” which explains the coevolution of product quality and consumer preference in the supply–demand context. This paper puts forward the following main points. First, we can conclude from a matching model of supply and demand that when a consumer who prefers high-quality products discovers such a product in the market, he/she will certainly purchase that product. Second, taking into account both the high survival rate of a firm that supplies a high-quality product and the cost incurred by the firm in improving product quality, we arrive at an evolutionarily stable Fisher’s process. The third point, however, considers the disutility of a consumer with an inordinately high quality preference; in this case, Fisher’s process disappears. Fourth, it is possible to recover Fisher’s process if we consider the existence of power users or the effect of the negative bias of innovation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen B. (2001) Technological change and the evolution of corporate innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Anderson E. S. (1994) Evolutionary economics: Post-Schumpeterian contributions. Pinter Publishers, London
Brock D. C. (eds) (2006) Understanding Moore’s law: Four decades of innovation. Chemical Heritage Press, Philadelphia
Bulmer M. G. (1985) The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Christensen C. M., Bower J. L. (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal 17: 197–218
Christensen C. M., Verlinden M., Westerman G. (2002) Disruption, disintegration and the dissipation of differentiability. Industrial Corporate Change 11: 955–993
Dosi G. (2000) Innovation, organization and economic dynamics. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Falconer D. S. (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, London
Fisher R. A. (1915) The evolution of sexual preferences. Eugenics Review 7: 184–192
Hodgson G. M. (1994) Economics and evolution: Bringing life back into economics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Iwasa Y., Pomiankowski A., Nee S. (1991) The evolution of costly mate preference II. Evolution 45: 1431–1442
Lande R. (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of Natural Academic Science of the U.S.A. 78: 3721–3725
Mayr E. (1976) Evolution and the diversity of life: Selected essays. Harvard University Press, Boston
Metcalfe J. S. (1998) Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. Routledge, New York
Nelson R., Winter S. (1984) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Boston
Pomiankowski A., Iwasa Y., Nee S. (1991) The evolution of costly mate preference I. Evolution 45: 1422–1430
Rohlfs J. H. (2001) Bandwagon effects in high-technology industries. The MIT Press, Boston
Sundbo J. (1998) The theory of innovation: Entrepreneurs, technology and strategy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Wadman W. M. (2000) Variable quality in consumer theory: Toward a dynamic microeconomic theory of the consume. M.E. Sharpe Inc, New York
Witt U. (1993) Evolutionary economics. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ida, T. Coevolution of product quality and consumer preferences. J Bioecon 12, 101–117 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-010-9083-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-010-9083-8