Skip to main content
Log in

Making Rock Art: Correspondences, Rhythms, and Temporalities

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-representational approaches (to rock art) have highlighted the relevance of making processes. Rhythm, temporality, and taskscapes emerge from every act of making, and are deeply engaged with the affective properties of these practices. In this paper, we outline a rhythm-analysis perspective to rock art discussing how it can shed light on the affective properties of this materiality, the emergence of landscapes, and the impact this practice had on the lived temporalities of the peoples that carried them out. We apply our approach to three case studies related to hunter-gatherer, agrarian, and Incaized communities in different areas of the Southern Andes. As a result, we discuss the relevance of approaching the relationship between making, rhythm, correspondences, and taskscapes to better understand rock art and avoid the pitfalls of an ahistorical relational perspective in archaeology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, F. (2010). Deconstruyendo el arte rupestre del sitio Tuququre 10: Lógicas simétricas y cambio socio-cultural en el Valle de Putaendo (Región de Valparíso, Chile). Werken, 12(1), 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, F., Troncoso, A., & Moya, F. (2018). Rock art assemblages in North Central Chile: Materials and practices through history. In A. Troncoso, F. Armstrong, & G. Nash (Eds.), Archaeologies of rock art: South American perspectives (pp. 242–263). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. (2018). Making textiles into persons: Gestural sequences and relationality in communities of weaving practices of the South-Central Andes. Journal of Material Culture, 23(2), 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aschero, C. (1998). De como interactúan emplazamientos, conjuntos y temas. Revista Del Museo De Historia Natural De San Rafael, 16, 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahn, P., & Lorblanchet, M. (1993). Rock art studies: The post-stylistic era or where do we go from here. Oxbows.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednarik, R. (1994). A taphonomy of paleoart. Antiquity, 68(258), 68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berenguer, J. (2004). Cinco milenios de arte rupestre en los andes atacameños: Imágenes para lo humano, imágenes para lo divino. Boletín Del Museo Chileno De Arte Precolombino, 9, 75–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenguer, J., & Martínez, J. L. (1986). El río Loa, el arte rupestre de Taira y el mito de Yakana. Boletín Del Museo Chileno De Arte Precolombino, 1, 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. (1997). Rock art and the prehistory of Europe: Signing the land. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carden, N., & Miotti, L. (2020). Unravelling rock art palimpsests through superimpositions: The definition of painting episodes in Los Toldos (southern Patagonia) as a baseline for chronology. Journal of Archaeological Science Reports, 30, 102265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, V., & Varela, V. (1992). Así sabían contar. Oralidad, 4, 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. (2013). Walking with: A rythmanalysis of London’s East end. Culture Unbound, 5, 531–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, J. (2015). Memory landscapes of the Inka carved outcrops. Boulder: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipolla, C. (2021). In search of different pasts. In R. Crellin; C. Cipolla, L. Montgomery, O. Harris & S. Moore (comps.), Archaeological theory in dialogue: Situating relationality, ontology, posthumanism, and indigenous archaeology (pp. 151–168). Routledge

  • Crellin, R. (2020). Change and Archaeology. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Marrai, E., & Robb, J. (2013). Art makes society: An introductory visual essay. World Art, 3(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahlander, F. (2019). Petroglyphs as contraptions - Animacy and vitalist technologies in a Bronze Age archipelago. Time and Mind, 12(2), 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falabella, F., Planella, M. T., & Tykot, R. H. (2008). El maíz (Zea mays) en el mundo prehispánico de Chile central. Latin American Antiquity, 19(1), 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiore, D. (1996). El arte rupestre como producto complejo de procesos ideológicos y económicos: Una propuesta de análisis. Espacio, Tiempo y Forma, Serie i, Prehistoria y Arqueología, 9, 239–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiore, D. (2007). The economic side of rock art. Concepts on the production of visual images. Rock Art Research, 24(2), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiore, D. (2020). The art of making images: Technological affordance, design variability and labour organization in the production of engraved artefacts and body paintings in Tierra del Fuego (Southern South America). Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 27(3), 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1985). Our time, their time, world time: The transformation of temporal modes. Ethnos, 50(3–4), 168–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo, F. (2018). Estilos de arte rupestre e interacción social en el Desierto de Atacama. Mundo De Antes, 12(1), 13–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo, F., Sinclaire, C., & Silva, C. (1999). Arte rupestre, emplazamiento y paisaje en la cordillera del desierto de Atacama. In J. Berenguer & F. Gallardo (Eds.), Arte Rupestre en los Andes de Capricornio (pp. 57–96). Museo Chileno de Arte Precolombino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo, F., & Yacobaccio, H. (2005). Wild or domesticated? Camelids in Early Formative rock art of the Atacama Desert (Northern Chile). Latin American Antiquity, 16(2), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (1992a). The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology. In J. Coote & A. Shelton (Eds.), Anthropology, art and aesthetics (pp. 40–67). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (1992b). The anthropology of time: Cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, Z. and J. O’Donoughue. 2015. Introduction: The enigma of the event. . In Z. Gilmore J.and O’Donoughue (eds.), The archaeology of events: Cultural change and continuity in the pre-Columbian southeast (pp. 1–22). University of Alabama Press

  • Gosden, C. (1994). Social Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosden, C., & Malafouris, L. (2015). Process archaeology (P-Arch). World Archaeology, 47(5), 701–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O. (2021). What do we mean by relational anyway. In R. Crellin; C. Cipolla, L. Montgomery, O. Harris & S. Moore (comps.), Archaeological theory in dialogue: Situating relationality, ontology, posthumanism, and indigenous archaeology (pp. 15–33). Routledge

  • Ingold, T. (1993). The temporality of landscape. World Archaeology, 25(2), 152–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2020). An archaeology of affect: Art, ontology and the carved stone balls of Neolithic Britain. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 27(3), 545–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2021). Rock art and the ontology of images: The ecology of images in hunter-gatherer and agrarian rock art. In O. Moro-Abadía & M. Porr (Eds.), Ontologies of rock art: Images, relational approaches, and indigenous knowledges (pp. 49–66). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., & Cochrane, A. (2018). The archaeology of art: Materials, practices, affects. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laguens, A., Bonnin, M., Abalos, M., Cruz, C., Fernández, M., Ferreira, M., Freites, N., Laguens, G., Ochoa, S., Pesci, A., & Quintero, M. (2019). Ritmo, tiempo y duraciones en la vida cotidiana de las sociedades agroalfareras de la región de Villa-Soto, Córdoba (pp. 58–78). XIII: Argentina. Revista Sociedades de Paisajes Áridos y Semi-Áridos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (2013). Rythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life. London: Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Williams, J. D. (2002). A cosmos in stone. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, G. (2008). Time and archaeological event. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(1), 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, G. (2021). Making time: The archaeology of time revisited. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mariscotti, A. M. (1978). Pachamama Santa Tierra, contribución al estudio de la religión autóctona en los Andes centro-meridionales. Berlin: Mann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meddens, F. (2006). Rocks in the landscape: Managing the Inka agricultural cycle. The Antiquaries Journal, 86, 36–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez, C., & Jackson, D. (2008). La ocupación prehispánica de Combarbalá: Una propuesta sintética. Chungara, 40(2), 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. (2005). What do pictures want? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mlekuz, D. (2010). Bodies, houses and gardens: Rythmanalysis of Neolithic life-ways (pp. 193–204). XXXVII: Documenta Praeshistorica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moro-Abadía, O., & González, M. (2020). Art in the making: Recent developments in the study of Pleistocene and Holocene images. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 27(3), 439–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moya, F. (2021). Archaeological analysis of pigmenting materials, a case study on Initial Late Holocene hunter-gatherers from north-central Chile. Journal of Archaeological Science Reports, 36, 102801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moya, F., Troncoso, A., Armstrong, F., Venegas, C., Cárcamo, J., & Artigas, D. (2021). Rock paintings, soot, and the practice of marking places: A case study in north-central Chile. Journal of Archaeological Science Reports, 36, 102853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moya, F., Troncoso, A., Sepúlveda, M., Cárcamo, J., & Gutierrez, S. (2016). Pinturas rupestres en el Norte Semiárido de Chile: Primera aproximación físico-química desde a cuenca hidrográfica del río Limarí (30 Lat. S). Boletín del Museo Chileno de Arte Precolombino., 21(2), 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oubiña, C., Criado, F., & Santos, M. (1998). Rewriting landscape: Incorporating sacred landscape into cultural tradition. World Archaeology, 30(1), 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual, D., Troncoso, A., Escudero, A., López, P., La Mura, N., & Pino, M. (2018). Cazadores recolectores del Holoceno Medio y Tardío en el centro norte de Chile: Alero Roca Fértil (30° Lat. S). Intersecciones En Antropología, 19, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. (2013). An archaeology of the cosmos: Rethinking agency and religion in Ancient America. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlovic, D., Sánchez, R., & Troncoso, A. (2003). Prehistoria de Aconcagua. San Felipe: CIEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlovic, D., Troncoso, A., González, P., & Sánchez, R. (2004). Por cerros, valles y rinconadas: investigaciones arqueológicas en el valle del río Putaendo, cuenca superior del río Aconcagua. Chungará, 36 (vol. Esp. II), 847–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porr, M. (2019). Rock art as art. Time and Mind, 12(2), 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ré, A. (2016). Superimpositions and attitudes towards pre-existing rock art: A case study in Southern Patagonia. In R. Bednarik, D. Fiore, M. Basile, G. Kumar, and T. Huisheng (eds.), Paleoart and Materiality: The scientific study of rock art (pp.15–30)

  • Robb, J. (2017). “Art” in archaeology and anthropology: An overview of the concept. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 27(4), 587–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb, J., & Pauketat, T. (2013). From moments to millennia: Theorizing scale and change in Human History. In J. Robb & T. Pauketat (Eds.), Big Histories, Human Lives: Tackling problems of scale in Archaeology (pp. 3–34). SAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J., & Davidson, I. (2006). Rock art and ritual: An archaeological analysis of rock art in arid central Australia. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 13, 304–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Estevez M. and F. Criado-Boado (2000). Deconstructing rock art spatial grammar in the Galician Bronze Age. In G. Nash (ed.), Signifying place and space: World perspective on rock art and landscape (pp. 111–121). BAR International Series 902, Oxford

  • Sørensen, T. (2015). More than a feeling: Towards an archaeology of atmosphere. Emotion, Space and Society, 15, 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1998). Time, culture and identity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C. (2008). Body and Image: Explorations in landscape phenomenology. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troncoso, A. (2008). Arte rupestre en la cuenca del Aconcagua: formas, sintaxis, estilo, espacio y poder. CSIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troncoso, A. (2019). Rock art, ontology and cosmopolitics in the Southern Andes. Time and Mind, 12(3), 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troncoso, A. (2022). Arte Rupestre, Historia y Comunidades en el centro norte de Chile. Santiago: Social Ediciones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troncoso, A., & Armstrong, F. (2017). Ontologia, Historia y la Experiencia del arte rupestre en el centro norte de Chile. In J. Pellini, A. Zarankin, & M. Salerno (Eds.), Sentidos Indisciplinados: Arqueología, Sensoralidad y Narrativas alternativas (pp. 307–346). JAS Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troncoso, A., Armstrong, F., Vergara, F., Ivanovic, F., & Urzúa, P. (2020). Nurturing and balancing the world: A relational approach to rock art and technology from north-central Chile (Southern Andes). Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 30(2), 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troncoso, A., Moya, F., & Basile, M. (2016). Rock art and social networks of north-central Chile. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 42, 154–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troncoso, A., Pascual, D., & Moya, F. (2018). Making rock art under the Spanish Empire: A comparison of hunter-gatherer and agrarian contact rock art in North-Central Chile. Australian Archaeology, 84(3), 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troncoso, A., Salazar, D., Parcero-Oubiña, C., Hayashida, F., Fábregas-Alvarez, P., & Larach, P. (2019). Maquetas Inkaicas en ChiuChiu: Paisaje y ritualidad agraria en el Desierto de Atacama. Estudios Atacameños, 63, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, D. (2017). Dimensiones sociales de la tecnología de producción del arte rupestre del valle de Lluta, norte de Chile. Santiago: Ocho libro editores.

  • Van de Guchte, M. (1990). Carving the world: Inca monumental sculpture and landscape. Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

  • Van de Guchte, M. (1996). Sculpture and the concept of the double among the Inca Kings. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 29/30, 256–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kessel, J. (1989). Ritual de producción y discurso tecnológico. Chungara, 23, 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, H. (1990). La tierra no da así no más. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergara, F. (2019). The dance of the lines: On the rhythms of making petroglyphs. Journal of Material Culture, 24(3), 270–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuidema, T. (2010). El Calendario Inca: Tiempo y Espacio en la organización ritual del Cusco. Lima: Fondo Editorial del Congreso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our colleagues who have worked with us in researching in North-Central Chile, particularly to Francisca Moya-Cañoles for her support and comments to this article; also to the anonymous referees for their comments, which allowed us to improve many weak points of the first version of the manuscript; and to ANID who financed this research through grants FONDECYT 1200276, FONDECYT 1040153, and CONICYT-USA 2013/0012.

Funding

This research has been funded by the Agencia Nacional de Investigación Científica-Chile grants FONDECYT 1200276, FONDECYT 1040153, and CONICYT-USA 2013/0012.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrés Troncoso.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Troncoso, A., Armstrong, F. Making Rock Art: Correspondences, Rhythms, and Temporalities. J Archaeol Method Theory 30, 611–635 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-022-09571-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-022-09571-9

Keywords

Navigation