Skip to main content
Log in

Angel Ethnogenesis and the Cahokian Diaspora

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rise of Cahokia, the largest precontact Native American city north of Mexico, was precipitated by centripetal and centrifugal mobilizations of peoples, ideas, objects, and practices. To interrogate outward Cahokian movements as diasporic, I reassess relationships between Cahokia and the Angel polity on the northeastern Mississippian frontier. I approach Mississippian communities through a relational framework as ever-emerging assemblages constituted by both human and non-human actors. This framework emphasizes ethnogenesis as a process of diaspora whereby dispersed groups are in a perpetual state of community-making outside of, but in reference to, a homeland. I focus on an analysis of the Angel assemblage of Ramey Incised pottery, a power-laden Cahokian object, and determine that Angel Ramey exhibits local paste signatures in what are otherwise primarily Cahokian-style pots. Further, I contextualize artifactual connections with socio-spatial practices of Angel communities and demonstrate that aligning residential structures and communal features to a Cahokian cosmography was a principal part of community-identity-making throughout the Angel polity. Ultimately, I argue that relationships with Cahokia motivated ethnogenesis in Angel communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberti, B., & Bray, T. L. (2009). Animating archaeology: of subjects, objects and alternative ontologies. A Special Section for Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 19(3), 337–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, B., & Marshall, Y. (2009). Conceptually open-ended methodologies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 19(3), 344–356.

  • Alt, S. M. (2002). Identities, traditions, and diversity in Cahokia’s uplands. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology, 27, 217–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, S. M. (2006). The power of diversity: the roles of migration and hybridity in culture change. In B. M. Butler, & P. D. Welch (Eds.), Leadership and polity in Mississippian society (pp. 289–308). Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations, occasional paper no. 33. Southern Illinois University.

  • Alt, S. M. (2017). Building Cahokia: transformation through tradition. In C. T. Halperin & L. Schwartz (Eds.), Vernacular architecture in the Americas (pp. 141–157). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, S. M. (2018). Cahokia’s diverse farmers. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, S. M. (2019). From weeping hills to lost caves: a search for vibrant matter in greater Cahokia. In S. M. Alt & T. R. Pauketat (Eds.), New materialisms ancient urbanisms. London: Routledge.

  • Alt, S. M., & Pauketat, T. R. (2007). Sex and the southern cult. In A. King (Ed.), The southeastern ceremonial complex (pp. 232–250). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, S. M., & Pauketat, T. R. (2011). Why wall trenches? Southeastern Archaeology, 30(1), 108–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthias, F. (1998). Evaluating ‘diaspora’: deyond ethnicity? Sociology, 32(3), 557–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. V. (1999). Archaeology and ethnohistory of the Caribbean plantation. In T. A. Singleton (Ed.), I, too, Am America: studies in African-American archaeology, 173–192. University of Virginia Press.

  • Ashley, K., & Thunen, R. L. (2020). St. Johns river fisher-hunter-gatherers: Florida’s connection to Cahokia. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 27(1), 1–21.

  • Baires, S. E. (2017). Land of water, city of the dead: religion and Cahokia’s emergence. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltus, M. R. (2014). Transforming material relationships: 13th century revitalization of Cahokian religious-politics. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

  • Baltus, M. R. (2015). Unraveling entanglements: Reverberations of Cahokia’s big bang. In M. E. Buchanan & B. Jacob Skousen (Eds.), Tracing the relational: the archaeology of worlds, spirits, and temporalities (pp. 146–160). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltus, M. R. (2018). Vessels of change: everyday relationality in the rise and fall of Cahokia. In Relational engagements of the indigenous Americas: alterity, ontology, and shifting paradigms.

  • Baltus, M. R., & Baires, S. E. (2012). Elements of ancient power in the Cahokian world. Journal of Social Archaeology, 12(2), 167–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltus, M. R., & Baires, S. E. (2020). Defining diaspora: A view from the Cahokia homeland. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 27(1).

  • Ball, S. (1996). The ray site: Angel phase mortuary behavior at an outlying site. Paper presented at the Midwest Archaeological Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

  • Bardolph, D. N. (2014). Evaluating Cahokian contact and Mississippian identity politics in the late prehistoric central Illinois River valley. American Antiquity, 79, 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baries, C. J., & Porter, J. W. (Eds.). (1984). American bottom archaeology: a summary of the FAI-270 project contribution to the culture history of the Mississippi River valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, F. (Ed.). (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. (2002). Emulation and empowerment: material, social, and economic dynamics in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Virginia. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 6(4), 253–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.

  • Betzenhauser, A. M. (2011). Creating the Cahokian community: the power of place in early Mississippian sociopolitical dynamics. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation University of Illinois, Urbana.

  • Betzenhauser, A. M. (2017). Cahokia’s beginnings: mobility, urbanization, and the Cahokian political landscape. In G. D. Wilson (Ed.), Mississippian beginnings. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.

  • Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird-David, N. (1999). Animism” revisited: personhood, environment, and relational epistemology. Current Anthropology, 40(S1), S67–S91.

  • Black, G. A. (1967). The angel site: an archaeological, historical, and ethnological study. Indianapolis: Indiana Historical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boszhardt, R. F., & Stoltman, J. B. (2016). Petrographic analysis of late woodland and middle Mississippian ceramics at the Iva site (47Lc42). Onalaska, Wisconsin, Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology, 41(2), 93–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. K. (2014). Mississippian community-making through everyday items at Kincaid mounds. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

  • Brennan, T. K. (Ed.). (2016). Main street mound: a ridgetop monument at the East St. Louis Mound Complex (Illinois state archaeological survey, research report 36). Urbana-Champaign: Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois.

  • Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2008). Diaspora identity and the potential for violence: toward an identity-mobilization framework. Identity, 8(1), 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. (2005). The ‘diaspora’ diaspora. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. (2017). Revisiting “the ‘diaspora’ diaspora”. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(9), 1556–1561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, M. E., & Wernette, M. (2016). Angel mounds feature 37 preliminary faunal results. Unpublished report for Indiana University Office of Vice Provost for Research on file at the Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology.

  • Buchanan, M. E. (2020). Diasporic longings? Cahokia, common field, and nostalgic orientations. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 27(1).

  • Butler, A. M. (2017). The Mission should you accept it: the built space of a Mississippian Mission. Indianapolis: Paper presented at the Midwest Archaeological Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipolla, C. N. (2017). Native American diaspora and ethnogenesis. Oxford Handbooks Online.

  • Cipolla, C. N. (2018). Earth flows and lively stone. What differences does ‘vibrant’matter make? Archaeological Dialogues, 25(1), 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. (1994). Diasporas. Cultural Anthropology, 9(3), 302–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, C. R. (1989). An appraisal of the role of Mill Creek chert hoes in Mississippian exchange systems. Southeastern Archaeology, 79–92.

  • Cobb, C. (2000). From quarry to cornfield: the political economy of Mississippian hoe production. Tuscalossa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (1997). Global diasporas, an introduction. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (2015). Foreword. In Sigona N., Gamblen A., Liberatore G., Neveu Kringelbach H. (Eds.) Diasporas re-imagined: spaces, Practices and Belonging, Oxford: University of Oxford.

  • Cole, F. C., Bell, R., Bennett, J., Caldwell, J., Emerson, N., MacNeish, R., Orr, K., & Willis, R. (1951). Kincaid: a prehistoric Illinois Metropolis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Collins, J. M. (1990). The archaeology of the Cahokia mounds ICT-II: Site structure, Illinois cultural resources study no. 10. Springfield: Illinois Historic Preservation Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. M. (1997). Cahokia settlement and social structures as viewed from the ICT-II. In T. R. Pauketat & T. E. Emerson (Eds.), Cahokia: domination and ideology in the Mississippian world (pp. 124–140). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. A. (2008). SunWatch: fort ancient development in the Mississippian world. The University of Alabama Press.

  • Crown, P. L., Emerson, T. E., Gu, J., Hurst, W. J., Pauketat, T. R., & Ward, T. (2012). Ritual black drink consumption at Cahokia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(35), 13944–13949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalan, R. A. (1997). The construction of Mississippian Cahokia. Cahokia: domination and ideology in the Mississippian world, 89–102.

  • Dalan, R. A., Holley, G. R., Woods, W. I., Watters, H. W., & Koepke, J. A. (2003). Envisioning Cahokia: a landscape perspective. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, W. R. (1993). Like a rolling stone: The chunkey game and political organization in eastern North America. Southeastern Archaeology, 83–92.

  • DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney-Rivera, C. (2000). Mississippian and late woodland cultural interaction and regional dynamics: a view from the lower Illinois River valley. Ph.D. Dissertation: Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, T. E. (1989). Water, serpents, and the underworld: an exploration into Cahokia symbolism. In (Ed.) Galloway, P. The Southeastern Ceremonial Complex: Artifacts and Analysis (pp. 45-92). University of Nebraska Press: Lincoln.

  • Emerson, T. E. (1991). The Apple River Mississippian culture of northwestern Illinois. In T. E. Emerson & R. Barry Lewis (Eds.), Cahokia and the hinterlands: Middle Mississippian cultures of the Midwest (pp. 164–182). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, T. E. (1997). Cahokia and the archaeology of power. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, T. E., Hedman, K. M., Brennan, T. K., Betzenhauser, A. M., Alt, S. M., & Pauketat, T. R. (2020). Interrogating diaspora and movement in the greater Cahokian world. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 27(1).

  • Ferguson, L. (1992). Uncommon ground: archaeology and early America, 1650–1800. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.

  • Fine, B., & Leopold, E. (1990). Consumerism and the industrial revolution. Social History, 12(2), 151–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, M. L., & Hall, R. L. (1975). Archaeological phases at Cahokia. In Perspectives in Cahokia Archaeology, Illinois archaeological survey, bulletin 10 (pp. 1–14). Urbana: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowles, S. (2009). The enshrined pueblo: villagescape and cosmos in the northern Rio Grande. American Antiquity, 74(3), 448–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friberg, C. M. (2017). Cosmic negotiations: Cahokian religion and Ramey incised pottery in the northern hinterland. Southeastern Archaeology, 37(1), 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, P. (1997). Where have all the menstrual huts gone? The invisibility of menstrual seclusion in the late prehistoric Southeast. In (Eds.) Claassen, C. & Joyce, R. Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica (pp. 47-62). University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Green, T. J. (1977). Economic relationships underlying Mississippian settlement patterns in Southwestern Indiana and North-Central Kentucky. Unpubublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington.

  • Green, T., & Munson, C. (1978). Mississippian settlement patterns in southwestern Indiana. In B. D. Smith (Ed.), Mississippian settlement patterns (pp. 293–330). New York: Academic Press.

  • Greenan, M., & Garniewicz, R. (2010). Investigations at the Yankeetown site (12W1). Indiana Archaeology, 5(1), 28–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, R. J. (1981). Ramey incised pottery, Circular No. 5. Urbana: Illinois Archaeological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. L. (1962). The archaeology of Carcajou Point. Two volumes: University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. L. (1991). Cahokia identity and interaction models of Cahokian Mississippian. In T. E. Emerson & R. Barry Lewis (Eds.), Cahokia and the hinterlands: Middle Mississippian cultures of the Midwest (pp. 3–34). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. L. (1997). An archaeology of the soul: North American Indian belief and ritual. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, G. (2006). Animism: respecting the living world. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstedt, S. (2005). Mississippian status in Western Kentucky: evidence from the Annis Mound. Southeastern Archaeology, 24(1), 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilakis, Y., & Jones, A. M. (2017). Archaeology and assemblage. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 27(1), 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O. J. T. (2013). Relational communities in prehistoric Britain. In C. Watts (Ed.), Relational archaeologies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O. J. T. (2014). (re) assembling communities. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 21(1), 76–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, E. (2013). Pre-Mississippian projectile points in Mississippian context at Angel Mounds. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology, 38(2), 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgeman, S. L. (2000). Pottery and chronology at angel. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgeman, S. L. & Schurr, M. R. (1987). The 1986 IU/GBL excavations at the Stephan-Steinkamp site (12Po33). Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 102nd Annual Meeting 96: 83-90.

  • Hodder, I. (2011). Human-thing entanglement: Towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17(1), 154–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holley, G. (1989). The archaeology of the Cahokia mounds ICT-II: Ceramics, Illinois cultural resources study no. 11. Springfield: Illinois Historic Preservation Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honerkamp, M. W. (1975). The Angel phase: an analysis of a middle Mississippian occupation in southwestern Indiana. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington.

  • Howey, M. (2011). Colonial encounters, European kettles, and the magic of mimesis in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth century indigenous northeast and Great Lakes. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 15(3), 329–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, C. M. (1979). Black drink: A native American tea. University of Georgia Press.

  • Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge.

  • Insoll, T. (Ed.). (2007). The archaeology of identities: A reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (2010). English houses 1300–1800: Vernacular architecture, social life. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (1997). The archaeology of ethnicity: Constructing identities in the past and the present. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justice, N. D. (1987). Stone age spear and arrow points of the midcontinental and eastern United States: a modern survey and reference. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Kelly, J. E. (1991). Cahokia and its role as a gateway center in interregional exchange. In T. E. Emerson & R. Barry Lewis (Eds.), Cahokia and the hinterlands: Middle Mississippian cultures of the Midwest (pp. 3–34). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudson, R. A. (1967). Cambria Village Ceramics. Plains Anthropologist, 12(37), 247–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krus, A. M. (2016). The timing of Precolumbian militarization in the US Midwest and southeast. American Antiquity, 81(2), 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilley, I. (2004). Diaspora and identity in archaeology: Moving beyond the Black Atlantic. In L. Meskell & R. Preucel (Eds.), A companion to social archaeology (pp. 287–312). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, D. E. (2013). Social organization and pottery production at the angel mounds archaeological site. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington.

  • Mehrer, M. W., & Collins, J. M. (1995). Household archaeology at Cahokia and its hinterlands. In J. Daniel Rogers & B. D. Smith (Eds.), Mississippian communities and households (pp. 32–57). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, J. M., & Connaway, J. M. (2020). Mississippian culture and Cahokian identities as considered through household archaeology at Carson, a monumental center in North Mississippi. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 27(1).

  • Miller, J. R. (2015). Interior carbonization patterns as evidence of ritual drink preparation in Powell plain and Ramey incised vessels. American Antiquity, 80(1), 170–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millhouse, P. G. (2012). The John chapman site and Creolization on the northern frontier of the Mississippian world. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

  • Mollerud, K. J. (2016). The Cambria connection: Identifying ceramic production and community interaction in late prehistoric Minnesota, AD 1050–1300. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

  • Monaghan, G. W., & Peebles, C. S. (2010). The construction, use, and abandonment of angel site mound a: Tracing the history of a middle Mississippian town through its earthworks. American Antiquity, 84(323), 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, G. W., Schilling, T., Krus, A. M., & Peebles, C. S. (2013). Mound construction chronology at angel mounds episodic mound construction and ceremonial events. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology, 38(2), 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munson, C. A. (1994). Archaeological investigations at the Southwind site, a Mississippian Community in Posey County, Indiana. Indianapolis: Manuscript on file at the Indiana Department of Natural Resources - Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, C. A., Strezewski, M., & Stafford, C. R. (2006). Archaeological investigations at the Prather site, Clark County, Indiana: The 2005 survey and excavations, IPFW archaeological survey reports of investigations 602. Fort Wayne: Indiana University-Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, D. (2017). Vernacular versus state housing in the Wari empire: Cosmological clashes and compromises. Halperin, Christina, and Lauren Schwartz, eds. Vernacular Architecture in the Pre-Columbian Americas. Taylor & Francis.

  • Niquette, C. M., Kreisa, P. P, Clay, R. B., & Crites, G. D. (1991). Excavations at the Andalex Village (15Hk22) Hopkins County, Kentucky. Cultural resource analysts, Inc. contract publication series 91-03.

  • O’Brien, P. J. (1972). A Formal Analysis of Cahokia Ceramics from the Powell Tract. Illinois archaeological survey monograph no. 3, Urbana, Illinois.

  • Orser Jr., C. E. (1998). The archaeology of the African diaspora. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27(1), 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, B. (2005). Distant colonies and explosive collapse: The two stages of the Tiwanaku diaspora in the Osmore drainage. Latin American Antiquity, 16(1), 45–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. R. (1998a). The archaeology of downtown Cahokia: the Tract 15A and Dunham Tract excavations. (Illinois transportation archaeological research program studies in archaeology 1). Urbana: University of Illinois.

  • Pauketat, T. R. (1998b). Refiguring the archaeology of greater Cahokia. Journal of Archaeological Research, 6(1), 45–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. R. (2001). The archaeology of traditions: Agency and history before and after Columbus. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. R. (2003). Resettled farmers and the making of a Mississippian polity. American Antiquity, 68, 39–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. R. (2004). Ancient Cahokia and the Mississippians. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. R. (2008). The grounds for Agency in Southwestern Archaeology. In M. D. Varien & J. M. Potter (Eds.), The social construction of communities (pp. 233–250). Lanham, Maryland: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. R. (2013). An archaeology of the Cosmos: Rethinking agency and religion in ancient America. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. R. (2019). Introducing new materialisms, rethinking ancient urbanisms. In S. M. Alt & T. R. Pauketat (Eds.), New materialisms ancient urbanisms (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. R., & Alt, S. M. (2003). Mounds, memory, and contested Mississippian history. Archaeologies of memory, 151-179.

  • Pauketat, T. R., & Alt, S. M. (2005). Agency in a postmold? Physicality and the archaeology of culture making. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 12(3), 213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. R., & Alt, S. M. (2018). Water and shells in bodies and pots: Mississippian rhizome, Cahokian Poiesis. In E. Harrison-Buck & J. Hendon (Eds.), Personhood & other-than-human agency in archaeology (pp. 72–99). Boulder: University of Colorado Press.

  • Pauketat, T. R., Alt, S. M., & Kruchten, J. D. (2017). The emerald acropolis: Elevating the moon and water in the rise of Cahokia. Antiquity, 91(355), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. R., & Emerson, T. E. (1991). The ideology of authority and the power of the pot. American Anthropologist, 93, 919–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. R., & Emerson, T. E. (1997). Conclusion: Cahokia and the four winds (pp. 269–278). Cahokia: Domination and Ideology in the Mississippian World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. R. & Emerson, T. E. (1999). Representation of hegemony as Community at Cahokia." in Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, edited by John E. Robb, 302–317. Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University.

  • Pauketat, T. R., Boszhardt, R. F., & Benden, D. M. (2015). Trempealeau entanglements: An ancient colony's causes and effects. American Antiquity, 80(2), 260–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, S. A. (2010). Townscape archaeology at Angel Mounds. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington.

  • Porter, J. W. (1964). Thin section description of some Shel[l] tempered prehistoric ceramics from the American bottoms. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Museum lithic laboratory, research report 7.

  • Redmond, B. G. (1990). The Yankeetown phase: Emergent Mississippian cultural adaptation in the lower Ohio River valley. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington.

  • Richards, J. D. (1992). Ceramics and culture at Aztalan: A late prehistoric village in Southeast Wisconsin. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthopology, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

  • Richards, J. D., & Zych, T. J. (2018). A landscape of mounds: Community Ehtnogenesis at Aztalan. In T. R. Pauketat & B. H. Koldehoff (Eds.), Archaeology and ancient religion in the American midcontinent (pp. 304–342). Tuscaloosa: University Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romain, W. F. (2014). Ancient astronomers of the eastern woodlands: Watson brake to Cahokia. Paper presented at the Midwest archaeological conference. Illinois: Champaign-Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romain, W. F. (2015). Moonwatchers of Cahokia. In (Eds.) Pauketat, T. R., & Alt, S. M. Medieval Mississippians: The Cahokian World. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research press.

  • Romain, W. F. (2018). Ancient Skywatchers of the eastern woodlands. In T. R. Pauketat & B. H. Koldehoff (Eds.), Archaeology and ancient religion in the American midcontinent (pp. 304–342). Tuscaloosa: University Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romain, W. F. (2019). Ancient Skywatchers of the Mississippi Valley. Lecture presented at the the Maya exploration center. Ohio: Chillicothe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran, W. (1991). Diasporas in modern societies: Myths of homeland and return. Disapora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 1(1), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skousen, B. J. (2018). Rethinking archaeologies of pilgrimage. Journal of Social Archaeology, 18(3), 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P. A., Hedman, K. M., & Emerson, T. E. (2014). Immigrants at the Mississippian polity of Cahokia: strontium isotope evidence for population movement. Journal of Archaeological Science, 44, 117–127.

  • Stoltman, J. B. (1991). Ceramic petrography as a technique for documenting cultural interaction: An example from the upper Mississippi Valley. American Antiquity, 56, 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltman, J. B., Benden, M. D., & Boszhardt, R. F. (2008). New evidence in the upper Mississippi Valley for Premississippian cultural interaction with the American bottom. American Antiquity, 73, 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Striker, M. A. (2009). Archaeological investigations at the Southwind site (12PO265), Posey County, Indiana. Project No. 07–55101. Report on file at the Indiana Department of Natural Resources-Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology, Indianapolis.

  • Tölölyan, K. (1996). Rethinking diaspora(s): Stateless power in the transnational moment. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 5(1), 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, J. O. (1975). Trends in Cahokia ceramics: Preliminary study of the collections from tracts 15A and 15B. In Perspectives in Cahokia archaeology: Illinois archaeological survey bulletin 10, edited by James A. Brown, pp. 32–71. Urbana: University of Illinois.

  • Voss, B. L. (2008). The archaeology of Ethnogenesis: Race and sexuality in colonial San Francisco. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, B. L. (2015). What's new? Rethinking ethnogenesis in the archaeology of colonialism. American Antiquity, 80(4), 655–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts Malouchos, E. (2016). Connecting to Cahokia: Reconsidering material connections between angel and the American bottom. In Paper presented at the 73rdannual southeastern archaeological conference. Athens: GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weik, T. M. (2014). The Archaeology of Ethnogenesis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43(1), 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesler, K. (2001). Excavations at Wickliffe mounds. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. D., Bardolph, D. N., Esarey, D., & Wilson, J. J. (2020). Early Mississippian diasporas of the north American midcontinent. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 27(1).

  • Wolforth, T. (1994). An examination of alignments between prehistoric constructions and solar alignments, In (Ed.) Munson, C. a. Archaeological Investigations at the Southwind Site, A Mississippian Community in Posey County Indiana. Indianapolis: Manuscript on file at the Indiana Department of Natural Resources - Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedeño, M. N. (2008). Bundled worlds: The roles and interactions of complex objects from the north American Plains. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 15(4), 362–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zych, T. J. (2013). The construction of a mound and a new community: an analysis of the ceramic and feature assemblages from the northeast Mound at the Aztalan site. Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee.

  • Zych, T. J. (2015). The chunkey game. In T. R. Pauketat & S. M. Alt (Eds.), The Medieval Mississippians (pp. 71–73). Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research at the Stephan-Steinkamp site was supported by the Indiana University Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology, Indiana University Department of Anthropology David C. Skomp Fund, and the generosity of Kenneth Burgdorf and family. Many thanks to my fellow co-organizers and contributors to the original session at the 2017 Southeastern Archaeological Conference and this special issue. Thank you to Dr. Susan Alt for the thoughtful comments on the conference draft of this paper and thanks to all the original session discussants (Dr. Vincas Steponaitis, Dr. Lynne Sullivan, Dr. Susan Alt, and Dr. Peter Peregrine) for your lively discussion of archaeologies of diaspora and the Mississippian world. Three anonymous reviewers provided thoughtful comments and suggestions that supported the transformation of this work from conference musings to article. Special thanks to my dear husband, Giannis Malouchos, for sharing his expertise in Ancient Greek language.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Watts Malouchos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watts Malouchos, E. Angel Ethnogenesis and the Cahokian Diaspora. J Archaeol Method Theory 27, 128–156 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-020-09443-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-020-09443-0

Keywords

Navigation