Evaluation of zooarchaeology’s quantitative units known as NISP (number of identified specimens) and MNI (minimum number of individuals) during the last three decades of the twentieth century suggested neither provided ratio scale measures of taxonomic abundances. Many researchers at that time began to use NISP as often as MNI to measure taxonomic abundances. In part because of a desire to determine the composition of human diet more precisely, and in light of the fact that different taxa have different numbers of identifiable bones, four zooarchaeologists have, since 1990, used assemblages with known ANI (actual number of individuals) to evaluate whether NISP or MNI provides the most accurate measure of ANI. ANI data from ethnoarchaeological and historical contexts suggest taxonomic abundance data quantified as NISP or MNI are ordinal scale at best, something previously shown to be highly probable. Experimental data used to evaluate the accuracy of NISP and MNI as measures of ANI are either inappropriate or not designed to assess which quantitative unit produces the most accurate measure. A new quantitative unit proposed as an alternative to MNE (minimum number of [skeletal] elements)—the NDE (number of distinct elements)—is said to provide proportional abundances of taxa but demonstrably undercounts skeletal parts and fails to provide ratio scale abundance data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Adams, W. R. (1949). Faunal remains from the Angel Site. Master of Arts thesis. Bloomington: Indiana University.
Adams, B. J., & Konigsberg, L. W. (2008). How many people? Determining the number of individuals represented by commingled human remains. In B. J. Adams & J. E. Byrd (Eds.), Recovery, analysis, and identification of commingled human remains (pp. 241–255). Totowa: Humana Press.
Allen, J., & Guy, J. B. M. (1984). Optimal estimations of individuals in archaeological faunal assemblages: how minimal is the MNI? Archaeology in Oceania, 19, 41–47.
Allen, M. S., & Nagaoka, L. A. (2004). “In the footsteps of von Haast. . . the discoveries something grand”: the emergence of zooarchaeology in New Zealand. In L. Furey & S. Holdaway (Eds.), Change through time: 50 years of New Zealand archaeology (pp. 193–214). Auckland: New Zealand Archaeological Association Monograph 26.
Audouze, F., & Enloe, J. G. (1997). High resolution archaeology at Verberie: limits and interpretations. World Archaeology, 29, 195–207.
Badgley, C. (1986). Counting individuals in mammalian fossil assemblages from fluvial environments. PALAIOS, 1, 328–338.
Bailey, G. (2007). Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26, 198–223.
Bennington, J. B., & Aronson, M. F. J. (2012). Reconciling scale in paleontological and neontological data: dimensions of time, space, and taxonomy. In J. Louys (Ed.), Paleontology in ecology and conservation (pp. 39–67). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Binford, L. R. (1978). Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology. New York: Academic Press.
Binford, L. R. (1981). Bones: ancient men and modern myths. Orlando: Academic Press.
Binford, L. R. (1984). Faunal remains from Klasies River mouth. Orlando: Academic Press.
Bobrowsky, P. T. (1982). An examination of Casteel’s MNI behavior analysis: a reductionist approach. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology, 7, 173–184.
Brain, C. K. (1969). The contribution of the Namib Desert Hottentots to an understanding of australopithecine bone accumulations. Scientific Papers of the Namib Desert Research Station, 39, 13–22.
Brain, C. K. (1981). The hunters or the hunted? An introduction to African cave taphonomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Breitburg, E. (1991). Verification and reliability of NISP and MNI methods of quantifying taxonomic abundance: a view from historic site zooarchaeology. In J. R. Purdue, W. E. Klippel, & B. W. Styles (Eds.), Beamers, bobwhites, and blue-points: tributes to the career of Paul W. Parmalee (pp. 153–162). Springfield: Illinois State Museum Scientific Papers 23.
Bunn, H. T. (1982). Meat-eating and human evolution: atudies on the diet and subsistence patterns of Plio-Pleistocene hominids in east Africa. Doctoral dissertation. Berkeley: University of California.
Cannon, M. D. (2013). NISP, bone fragmentation, and the measurement of taxonomic abundance. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 20, 397–419.
Carlson, C. C. (1999). History of zooarchaeology in New England. In M. A. Levine, K. E. Sassaman, & M. S. Nassaney (Eds.), The archaeological Northeast (pp. 171–181). Westport: Bergin & Garvey.
Casteel, R. W. (1977a). Characterization of faunal assemblages and the minimum number of individuals determined from paired elements: continuing problems in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science, 4, 125–134.
Casteel, R. W. (1977b). A consideration of the behaviour of the minimum number of individuals index: a problem in faunal characterization. OSSA, 3(4), 141–151.
Chaplin, R. E. (1971). The study of animal bones from archaeological sites. London: Seminar Press.
Clason, A. T. (1972). Some remarks on the use and presentation of archaeozoological data. Helenium, 12, 139–153.
Crabtree, P. J. (2018). The value in studying large faunal collections using traditional zooarchaeological methods: a case study from Anglo-Saxon England. In C. M. Giovas & M. J. LeFebvre (Eds.), Zooarchaeology in practice: case studies in methodology and interpretation in archaeofaunal analysis (pp. 173–188). Cham: Springer.
Dobney, K., & Rielly, K. (1988). A method for recording archaeological animal bones: the use of diagnostic zones. Circa, 5, 79–96.
Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. (2012). Critical review of the MNI (minimum number of individuals) as a zooarchaeological unit of quantification. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 4, 47–59.
Driver, J. C. (1992). Identification, classification and zooarchaeology. Circa, 9(1), 35–47.
Dunnell, R. C., & Dancey, W. S. (1983). The siteless survey: a regional scale data collection strategy. In M. B. Schiffer (Ed.), Advances in archaeological method and theory (Vol. 6, pp. 267–287). New York: Academic Press.
Eck, G. G. (2007). The effects of collection strategy and effort on faunal recovery: a case study of the American and French collections from the Shungura Formation, Ethiopia. In R. Bobé, Z. Alemseged, & A. K. Behrensmeyer (Eds.), Hominin environments in the East African Pliocene: an assessment of the faunal evidence (pp. 183–215). Dordrecht: Springer.
Enloe, J. G. (2003). Acquisition and processing of reindeer in the Paris basin. In S. Costamagno & V. Laroulandie (Eds.), Zooarchaeological insights into Magdalenian lifeways (pp. 23–31). Oxford: BAR International Series 1144.
Enloe, J. G., & David, F. (1992). Food sharing in the Paleolithic: carcass refitting at Pincevent. In J. L. Hofman & J. G. Enloe (Eds.), Piecing together the past: applications of refitting studies in archaeology (pp. 296–315). Oxford: BAR International Series 578.
Fieller, N. R. J., & Turner, A. (1982). Number estimation in vertebrate samples. Journal of Archaeological Science, 9, 49–62.
Foley, R. (1981). Off-site archaeology: an alternative approach for the short-sited. In I. Hodder, G. Isaac, & N. Hammond (Eds.), Pattern of the past: studies in honour of David Clarke (pp. 157–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ford, J. A. (1962). A quantitative method for deriving cultural chronology. Technical Manual no. 1. Washington, DC: Pan American Union.
Gautier, A. (1984). How do I count you, let me count the ways? Problems in archaeozoological quantification. In C. Grigson & J. Clutton-Brock (Eds.), Animals and archaeology 4: husbandry in Europe (pp. 237–251). Oxford: BAR International Series 227.
Gifford, D. P. (1981). In M. B. Schiffer (Ed.), Taphonomy and paleoecology: a critical review of archaeology’s sister disciplines (Vol. 4, pp. 365–438). New York: Academic Press.
Gifford-Gonzalez, D., & Hildebrandt, W. R. (2012). If mussels weighed a ton: problems with quantifying Santa Barbara Channel archaeofaunas. In M. A. Glassow & T. L. Joslin (Eds.), Exploring methods of faunal analysis: insights from California archaeology (pp. 97–107). Perspectives in California Archaeology Vol. 9. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California.
Gilinsky, N. L., & Bennington, J. B. (1994). Estimating numbers of whole individuals from collections of body parts: a taphonomic limitation of the paleontological record. Paleobiology, 20, 245–258.
Giovas, C. M. (2009). The shell game: analytic problems in archaeological mollusc quantification. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 1557–1564.
Giovas, C. M. (2018). Impact of analytic protocols on archaeofish abundance, richness, and similarity: a Caribbean-Pacific crossover study. In C. M. Giovas & M. J. LeFebvre (Eds.), Zooarchaeology in practice: case studies in methodology and interpretation in archaeofaunal analysis (pp. 59–89). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Gobalet, K. W. (2001). A critique of faunal analysis: inconsistency among experts in blind tests. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28, 377–386.
Grayson, D. K. (1973). On the methodology of faunal analysis. American Antiquity, 38, 432–439.
Grayson, D. K. (1978). Minimum numbers and sample size in vertebrate faunal analysis. American Antiquity, 43, 53–65.
Grayson, D. K. (1979). On the quantification of vertebrate archaeofaunas. In M. B. Schiffer (Ed.), Advances in archaeological method and theory (Vol. vol. 2, pp. 199–237). New York: Academic Press.
Grayson, D. K. (1984). Quantitative zooarchaeology: topics in the analysis of archaeological faunas. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Grayson, D. K., & Frey, C. J. (2004). Measuring skeletal part representation in archaeological faunas. Journal of Taphonomy, 2, 27–42.
Guthrie, R. D. (1984). Alaskan megabucks, megabulls, and megagrams: the issue of Pleistocene gigantism. In H. H. Genoways & M. R. Dawson (Eds.), Contributions in Quaternary vertebrate paleontology: a volume in memorial to John E. Guilday (pp. 482–510). Special Publication no. 8, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Museum of Natural History.
Harris, M., Weisler, M., & Faulkner, P. (2015). A refined protocol for calculating MNI in archaeological molluscan shell assemblages: a Marshall Island case study. Journal of Archaeological Science, 57, 168–179.
Hesse, B. (1982). Bias in the zooarchaeological record: suggestions for interpretation of bone counts in faunal samples from the Plains. In D. H. Ubelaker & H. J. Viola (Eds.), Plains Indian studies: a collection of essays in honor of John C. Ewers and Waldo R. Wedel (pp. 157–172). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology no. 30.
Hesse, B., & Wapnish, P. (1985). Animal bone archeology: from objectives to analysis. Manuals in archeology 5. Washington, DC: Taraxacum.
Holdaway, S., & Wandsnider, L. (Eds.). (2008). Time in archaeology: time perspectivism revisited. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Holtzman, R. C. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of fossil assemblage composition. Paleobiology, 5, 77–90.
Horwitz, L. K. (2002). The development of archaeozoological research in Israel and the West Bank. Archaeofauna, 11, 131–145.
Hudson, J. L. (1990). Advancing methods in zooarchaeology: an ethnoarchaeological study among the Aka. Doctoral dissertation. Santa Barbara: Department of Anthropology, University of California.
Hudson, J. L. (1993). The impacts of domestic dogs on bone in forager camps; or, the dog-gone bones. In J. [L.] Hudson (Ed.), From bones to behavior: ethnoarchaeological and experimental contributions to the interpretation of faunal remains (pp. 301–323). Occasional Paper no. 21. Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University.
Jamniczky, H. A., Brinkman, D. B., & Russell, A. P. (2008). How much is enough? A repeatable, efficient, and controlled sampling protocol for assessing taxonomic diversity and abundance in vertebrate microfossil assemblages. In J. T. Sankey & S. Baszio (Eds.), Vertebrate microfossil assemblages: their role in paleoecology and paleobiogeography (pp. 9–16). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Jochim, M. A. (1976). Hunter-gatherer subsistence and settlement: a predictive model. New York: Academic Press.
Joslin, T. L. (2012). Analytical sampling strategies for marine fish remains: measuring taxonomic diversity and abundance in central California middens. In M. A. Glassow & T. L. Joslin (Eds.), Exploring methods of faunal analysis: insights from California archaeology (pp. 135–147). Perspectives in California Archaeology Vol. 9. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California.
Klein, R. G., & Cruz-Uribe, K. (1984). The analysis of animal bones from archeological sites. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Knüsel, C. J., & Outram, A. K. (2004). Fragmentation: the zonation method applied to fragmented human remains from archaeological and forensic contexts. Environmental Archaeology, 9(1), 85–97.
Lambacher, N., Gerdau-Rodnic, K., Bonthorne, E., & de Tarazaga Montero, F. J. V. (2016). Evaluating three methods to estimate the number of individuals from commingled context. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 10, 674–683.
Lyman, R. L. (1984). Bone density and differential survivorship of fossil classes. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 3, 259–299.
Lyman, R. L. (1985). Bone frequencies: differential transport, in situ destruction, and the MGUI. Journal of Archaeological Science, 12, 221–236.
Lyman, R. L. (1994a). Quantitative units and terminology in zooarchaeology. American Antiquity, 59, 36–71.
Lyman, R. L. (1994b). Relative abundances of skeletal specimens and taphonomic analysis of vertebrate remains. PALAIOS, 9, 288–298.
Lyman, R. L. (1994c). Vertebrate taphonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyman, R. L. (2006). Identifying bilateral pairs of deer (Odocoileus sp.) bones: how symmetrical is symmetrical enough? Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 1256–1265.
Lyman, R. L. (2008). Quantitative paleozoology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyman, R. L. (2015a). The history of “laundry lists” in North American zooarchaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 39, 42–50.
Lyman, R. L. (2015b). On the variable relationship between NISP and NTAXA in bird remains and in mammal remains. Journal of Archaeological Science, 53, 291–296.
Lyman, R. L. (2016). Theodore E. White and the development of zooarchaeology in North America. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Lyman, R. L. (2017). Paleoenvironmental reconstruction from faunal remains: ecological basics and analytical assumptions. Journal of Archaeological Research, 25, 315–371.
Lyman, R. L. (2018a). The history of MNI in North American zooarchaeology. In C. M. Giovas & M. LeFebvre (Eds.), Zooarchaeology in practice: case studies in methodology and interpretation in archaeofaunal analysis (pp. 13–33). New York: Springer.
Lyman, R. L. (2018b). Observations on the history of zooarchaeological quantitative units: why NISP, then MNI, then NISP again? Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 18, 43–50.
Lyman, R. L., & Ames, K. M. (2007). On the use of species-area curves to detect the effects of sample size. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34, 1985–1990.
Lyman, R. L., & VanPool, T. (2009). Metric data in archaeology: a study of intra-analyst and inter-analyst variation. American Antiquity, 74, 485–504.
Marean, C. W., & Frey, C. J. (1997). Animal bones from caves to cities: reverse utility curves as methodological artifacts. American Antiquity, 62, 698–711.
Medlock, R. C. (1976). Determining the minimum number of individuals in archeological faunal analysis. Master of Arts thesis. Fayetteville: Department of Anthropology, University of Arkansas.
Moore, J. R., Norman, D. B., & Upchurch, P. (2007). Assessing relative abundances in fossil assemblages. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 253, 317–322.
Morin, E., Ready, E., Boileau, A., Beauval, C., & Coumont, M.-P. (2017a). Problems of identification and quantification in archaeozoological analysis, part I: insights from a blind test. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24, 886–937.
Morin, E., Ready, E., Boileau, A., Beauval, C., & Coumont, M.-P. (2017b). Problems of identification and quantification in archaeozoological analysis, part II: presentation of an alternative counting method. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24, 938–973.
Morlan, R. E. (1994). Bison bone fragmentation and survivorship: a comparative method. Journal of Archaeological Science, 21, 797–807.
Münzel, S. C. (1986). Coding system for bone fragments. In L. H. Van Wijngaarden-Bakker (Ed.), Database management and zooarchaeology (pp. 193–195). PACT 14. Strasbourg.
Münzel, S. C. (1988). Quantitative analysis and archaeological site interpretation. ArchaeoZoologia, 2(1, 2), 93–110.
Nichol, R. K., & Creak, G. A. (1979). Matching paired elements among archaeological bone remains: a computer procedure and some practical limitations. Newsletter of Computer Archaeology, 14, 6–17.
Parmalee, P. W. (1985). Identification and interpretation of archaeologically derived animal remains. In R. I. Gilbert & J. H. Mielke (Eds.), The analysis of prehistoric diets (pp. 61–95). New York: Academic Press.
Payne, S. (1975). Partial recovery and sample bias. In A. T. Clason (Ed.), Archaeozoological studies (pp. 7–17). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Perkins Jr., D. (1973). A critique on the methods of quantifying faunal remains from archaeological sites. In J. Matolcsi (Ed.), Domestikationsforschung und geschichte der haustiere (pp. 367–370). Budapest: Academiai Kiado.
Plog, F. T. (1973). Diachronic anthropology. In C. L. Redman (Ed.), Research and theory in current archeology (pp. 181–198). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Plog, F. T. (1974). The study of prehistoric change. New York: Academic Press.
Plug, C., & Plug, I. (1990). MNI counts as estimates of species abundance. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 45, 53–57.
Pollock, H. E. D., & Ray, C. E. (1957). Notes on vertebrate animal remains from Mayapan. Department of Archaeology, Carnegie Institution of Washington. Current Reports, 41, 633–656.
Rackham, D. J. (1986). Assessing the relative frequency of species by the application of a stochastic model to a zooarchaeological database. In L. H. van Wijngaarden-Bakker (Ed.), Database management and zooarchaeology (pp. 185–192). Strasbourg: PACT 14.
Reitz, E. J. (1993). Zooarchaeology. In J. K. Johnson (Ed.), The development of Southeastern archaeology (pp. 109–131). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Reitz, E. J., & Wing, E. S. (2008). Zooarchaeology (second ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ringrose, T. J. (1993). Bone counts and statistics. Journal of Archaeological Science, 20, 121–157.
Robb, J. (2016). What can we really say about skeletal part representation, MNI and funerary ritual? A simulation approach. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 10, 684–692.
Robison, N. D. (1987). Zooarchaeology: its history and development. In A. E. Bogan & N. D. Robison (Eds.), The zooarchaeology of eastern North America: history, method and theory, and bibliography (pp. 1–26). Miscellaneous Paper no. 12. Knoxville: Tennessee Anthropological Association.
Rogers, R. R., Carrano, M. T., Rogers, K. A. C., Perez, M., & Reagan, A. K. (2017). Isotaphonomy in concept and practice: an exploration of vertebrate microfossil bonebeds in the upper cretaceous (Campanian) Judith River Formation, north-central Montana. Paleobiology, 43, 248–273.
Rosell, J., Blasco, R., Fernández-Laso, M. C., Vaquero, M., & Carbonell, E. (2012). Connecting areas: faunal refits as a diagnostic element to identify synchronicity in the Abric Romaní archaeological assemblages. Quaternary International, 252, 56–67.
Schiffer, M. B. (1987). Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Smith, B. D. (1975). Middle Mississippi exploitation of animal populations. Anthropological Papers no. 57. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.
Staff, G., Powell, E. N., Stanton, R. J., & Cummins, H. (1985). Biomass: is it a useful tool in paleocommunity reconstruction? Lethaia, 18, 209–232.
Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677–680.
Stewart, K. M. (2002). Past and present zooarchaeology in Canada. Archaeofauna, 11, 147–157.
Thomas, D. H. (1975). Nonsite sampling in archaeology: up the creek without a site? In J. W. Mueller (Ed.), Sampling in archaeology (pp. 61–81). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Thomas, K. D., & Mannino, M. A. (2017). Making numbers count: beyond minimum numbers of individuals (MNI) for the quantification of mollusc assemblages from shell matrix sites. Quaternary International, 427, 47–58.
Todd, L. C. (1987). Taphonomy of the Horner II bone bed. In G. C. Frison & L. C. Todd (Eds.), The Horner Site: the type site of the Cody Cultural Complex (pp. 107–198). Orlando: Academic Press.
Todd, L. C., & Frison, G. C. (1992). Reassembly of bison skeletons from the Horner Site: a study in anatomical refitting. In J. L. Hofman & J. G. Enloe (Eds.), Piecing together the past: applications of refitting studies in archaeology (pp. 63–82). Oxford: BAR International Series 578.
Todd, L. C., & Stanford, D. J. (1992). Application of conjoined bone data to site structural studies. In J. L. Hofman & J. G. Enloe (Eds.), Piecing together the past: applications of refitting studies in archaeology (pp. 21–35). Oxford: BAR International Series 578.
Travouillon, K. J., Archer, M., Legendre, S., & Hand, S. J. (2007). Finding the minimum sample richness (MSR) for multivariate analyses: implications for palaeoecology. Historical Biology, 19, 315–320.
Trusler, A. K. (2014). The impact of recovery methods on taxonomic richness in Roman faunal assemblages. Archaeometry, 56, 1075–1084.
Vermeij, G. J., & Herbert, G. S. (2004). Measuring relative abundance in fossil and living assemblages. Paleobiology, 30, 1–4.
Voorhies, M. R. (1969). Taphonomy and population dynamics of an early Pliocene vertebrate fauna, Knox County, Nebraska. Contributions to Geology, Special Paper no. 1. Laramie: University of Wyoming.
Watson, J. P. N. (1979). The estimation of the relative frequencies of mammalian species: Khirokitia 1972. Journal of Archaeological Science, 6, 127–137.
White, T. E. (1953). A method of calculating the dietary percentage of various food animals utilized by aboriginal peoples. American Antiquity, 19, 396–398.
Wild, C. J., & Nichol, R. K. (1983). Estimation of the original number of individuals from paired bone counts using estimators of the Krantz type. Journal of Field Archaeology, 10, 1337–1344.
Zar, J. H. (1996). Biostatistical analysis (third ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Helpful comments by five anonymous reviewers, particularly the two with very sharp eyes and pencils, helped me polish the text.
About this article
Cite this article
Lyman, R.L. A Critical Review of Four Efforts to Resurrect MNI in Zooarchaeology. J Archaeol Method Theory 26, 52–87 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-018-9365-3
- Experimental zooarchaeology
- Minimum number of individuals
- Number of identified specimens
- Quantitative units
- Taxonomic abundances