Identifying Female in the Halaf: Prehistoric Agency and Modern Interpretations
- 469 Downloads
This article considers ways that representations of anthropomorphic imagery in the form of figurines from prehistoric village communities have been interpreted and provides a new framework for analyzing figurines. It has been long suggested that prehistoric figurines should be interpreted as representations of female gendered qualities related to ritual, fertility, and motherhood combined into a concept called “mother goddess.” The impetus for the adoption of this interpretation and evidential association with prehistoric figurine assemblages and bound to binary gender is briefly critiqued. The methodology for studying figurine assemblages presented here utilizes typological, archaeological, and comparative analysis and is cognizant of inherent ambiguities in the object biographies of the full assemblage. This study applies this methodology to a corpus of figurines excavated from sixth millennium settlements associated with the Halaf material culture. This approach is then operationalized with case studies of figurines excavated from Domuztepe (Turkey) and Chagar Bazar (Syria) as examples of engagement with those who conceived, made, used, and discarded them. The Halaf figurine corpus is shown as nuanced, displaying sexual difference and humanness on a spectrum from overt to ambiguous. Considered as a whole, the Halaf corpus is shown to have had mundane and mutable use lives related to embodied identities entangled with culture and community, unconnected to gender binaries, ritual, fertility, or motherhood.
KeywordsMesopotamia Halaf culture Prehistoric figurines Prehistoric art Ambiguity Object biography Typology (archaeology) Gender identity
I am grateful to three anonymous reviewers whose comments and suggestions have improved this paper considerably. Thanks also go to the organizers of the original conference session in September 2014, who became careful, patient, and steadfast editors of this special issue. Appreciation goes also to Brian Boyd, the Columbia University Center for Archaeology, Karina Croucher, Bradford University, and Philipp Rassmann for their support as well as their comments and critiques on earlier versions of this paper. This article is much better as a result of this feedback; I take full responsibility for all remaining problems and errors in this paper. I am grateful also to the many museum curators and excavations directors who allowed me to study the Halaf figurine assemblages under their care. Travel to Istanbul both to present this paper at the European Archaeologists Association in 2014 and to conduct the research presented here was supported by John Jay College and The Research Foundation, City University of New York.
- Bahrani, Z. (2001). The women of Babylon: gender and representation in Mesopotamia. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Belcher, E. (2011). Halaf bead and seal ‘workshops’ at Domuztepe: technological and reductive strategies. In E. Healy, S. Campbell, & O. Maeda (Eds.), The state of the stone: terminologies, continuities and contacts in Near Eastern Lithics. SENEPSE 13, (pp. 135–143). Berlin: ex-Orient. URL: http://academicworks.cuny.edu/jj_pubs/72/.
- Belcher, E. (2014). Embodiment of the Halaf: Late Neolithic figurines from Northern Mesopotamia. Unpublished PhD thesis, Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Belcher, E, & Croucher, K. (2016). Exchanges of identity in prehistoric Anatolian figurines. In R. A. Stucky, O. Kaelin, & H. P. Mathys (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East (9th ICAANE) (, Vol. I, pp. 43–56). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. URL: http://academicworks.cuny.edu/jj_pubs/57.
- Brilliant, R. (1991). Portraiture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, B. (2001). Thing theory. Critical Inquiry, 28(1), 1–22. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1344258.
- Cauvin, J. (2000). The birth of the Gods and the origins of agriculture. Translated by T. Watkins Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Campbell, S. (2004). Domuztepe 2004 excavation season. Anatolian Archaeology, 10, 4–5.Google Scholar
- Chapman, J. (2000). Fragmentation in archaeology. London.Google Scholar
- Chapman, J., & Gayarska, B. (2006). Parts and wholes: fragmentation in prehistoric context. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
- Cobb, H., & Croucher, K. (2016). Personal, political, pedagogic: challenging the binary bind in archaeological teaching, learning and fieldwork. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23(3). doi: 10.1007/s10816-016-9292-0.
- Conkey, M. W., & Tringham, R. E. (1995). Archaeology and the goddess: exploring the contours of feminist archaeology. In D. C. Stanton & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Feminisms in the academy (pp. 199–247). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Croucher, K. (2008). Ambiguous genders, altered identities: alternative interpretations of figurine and mortuary evidence from the ‘PPNB’—‘Halaf’ periods. In D. Bolger (Ed.), Gender through time in the ancient near east (pp. 21–52). Lanham, MD: Alta-Mira Press.Google Scholar
- Croucher, K., & Belcher, E. (2016). Prehistoric Anatolian Figurines. Chapter 20. In T. Insoll (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of prehistoric figurines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dames, A. (2008). Evaluating patterns of gender through Mesopotamian and Iranian figurines: a reassessment of the Neolithic and Chalcolithic period industries. In D. Bolger (Ed.), Gender through time in the ancient near east (pp. 77–117). Lanham, MD: Alta-Mira Press.Google Scholar
- Davidson, T., & Watkins, T. (1981). Two seasons of excavation at Tell Aqab in the Jezirah, N. E. Syria. Iraq, 43, 1–18. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4200130.
- Denham, S. (2013). The meanings of late Neolithic Stamp Seals in North Mesopotamia. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
- Eller, C. (2000). The myth of matriarchal prehistory. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Ferrer, M. (2016). Feeding the community: women’s participation in communal celebrations, western Sicily (8th–6th centuries B.C.). Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23(3). doi: 10.1007/s10816-016-9293-z.
- Fowler, C. (2004). The archaeology of personhood: an anthropological approach. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gaydarska, B., Chapman, J., Raduncheva, A., & Koleva, B. (2007). The châine opératoire approach to prehistoric figurines: an example from Dolnoslav, Bulgaria. In C. Renfrew & I. Morley (Eds.), Image and imagination, a global prehistory of figurative representation (pp. 171–184). Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute.Google Scholar
- Gimbutas, M. (1982). The goddesses and gods of old Europe: 7000 to 3500 BC: myths, legends and cult images. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
- Gimbutas, M. (1989). The language of the goddess: unearthing the hidden symbols of western civilization. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
- Goodison, L., & Morris, Y. (1999). Ancient goddesses: the myths and the evidence. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
- Gosden, C. and Marshall, Y. (1999). The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology, 31(2), 169–178. URL:.http://www.jstor.org/stable/125055
- Hamilton, S., Whitehouse, R., & Wright, C. (Eds.) (2007). Archaeology and women, ancient and modern issues. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
- Hill, J. D. (1995). Ritual and rubbish in the iron age of Wessex: a study of formation of a specific archaeological record. Oxford: BAR British Series 42.Google Scholar
- Hodder, I. (2003). Archaeological reflexivity and the “local” voice. Anthropological Quarterly, 76(1), 55–69. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3318361.
- Ingold, T. (2013). Making: anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Irving, A., & Heywood, C. (2004). The ceramics from the ‘death pit’ at Domuztepe: conservation and analysis. Anatolian Archaeology, 10, 6.Google Scholar
- Joyce, R. (2008). Ancient bodies, ancient lives: sex, gender and archaeology. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
- Joyce, R., & Gillespie, S. (2015). Making things out of objects that move. In R. Joyce & S. Gillespie (Eds.), Things in motion: object itineraries in anthropological practice (pp. 3–20). Santa Fe: S.A.R. Press.Google Scholar
- Kingery, D. (Ed.) (1996). Learning from things: method and theory of material culture studies. Washington, DC: Smithsonian.Google Scholar
- Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things: commoditization as a process. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 64–91). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kuijt, I., & Cheson, M. (2005). Lumps of clay and pieces of stone: ambiguity, bodies and identity as portrayed in Neolithic figurines. In Pollack & R. Bernbeck (Eds.), Archaeologies of the Middle East (pp. 52–183). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lemonnier, P. (2012). Critical cultural heritage series: mundane objects: materiality and non-verbal communication. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
- Mallowan, M. E. L. (1936). The excavations at Tall Chagar Bazar, and an archaeological survey of the Habur Region, 1934–5. Iraq, 3(1), 1–85. URL: www.jstor.org/stable/4241586.
- Mallowan, M. E. L., & Cruikshank Rose, J. (1935). Excavations at Tall Arpachiyah, 1933. Iraq, 2(1), i–178. URL: www.jstor.org/stable/4241576.
- Mauss, M. (1950). The gift: the form and reason for exchange in archaic societies, trans. W D. Halls [New York, 1990].Google Scholar
- Meskell, L. M. (1998a). Twin peaks: the archaeologies of Çatalhöyük. In L. Goddison & C. Morris (Eds.), Ancient goddesses: the myths and the evidence (pp. 46–62). London: British Museum.Google Scholar
- Meskell, L. M. (2007). Refiguring the corpus at Çatalhöyük. In C. Renfrew & I. Morley (Eds.), Material beginnings: a global prehistory of figurative representation (pp. 143–156). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Miller, M. A. (2002). The function of the anthropomorphic figurines: a preliminary analysis. In Y. Garfinkle & M. A. Miller (Eds.), Sha‘ar Hagolan volume 1: Neolithic art in context (pp. 221–233). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
- Mina, M. (2007). Figurines without sex; people without gender? In S. Hamilton, R. Whitehouse, & K. Wright (Eds.), Women in archaeology, women in antiquity (pp. 263–282). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press..Google Scholar
- Mina, M. (2008). Anthropomorphic figurines from the Neolithic and early bronze age Aegean: gender dynamics and implications for the understanding of Aegean Prehistory (BAR International Series 1894). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
- Morsch, M. (2002). Magic figurines? A view from Nevalı Çori. In H. G. K. Gebel, B. D. Hermansen, & C. H. Jensen (Eds.), Magic practices and ritual in the near Eastern Neolithic (pp. 145–162). SENEPSE 8. Ex-Orient: Berlin.Google Scholar
- Morales, V. B. (1990). Figurines and other clay objects from Sarab and Çayönü. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago/O.I.C. 25.Google Scholar
- Renda, G. E. (Ed.). (1993). Woman in Anatolia: 9000 years of the Anatolian woman. Istanbul.Google Scholar
- Shanks, M. (2012). Archaeological imagination. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
- Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. (1992). Re-constructing archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Tobler, A. (1950). Excavations at Tepe Gawra II: the earlier levels. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
- Voigt, M. (2000). Çatalhöyük in context: ritual in early Neolithic sites in central and eastern Turkey. In I. Kuijt (Ed.), Life in Neolithic farming communities: social organization, identity and differentiation (pp. 253–293). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
- Voigt, M. (1983). Hajji Firuz Tepe, Iran: the Neolithic settlement. Philadelphia: University Museum, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Von Oppenheim, M., & Schmidt, H. (1943). Tell Halaf I: Die Prähistorischen Funde. Berlin: De Gruyter & Co..Google Scholar
- Ucko, P. (1963). The interpretation of prehistoric figurines. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 92, 38–54.Google Scholar
- Ucko, P. (1968). Anthropomorphic figurines of predynastic Egypt and Neolithic Crete with comparative material from the prehistoric Near East and mainland Greece. Royal Anthropological Institute Occasional Paper 24, London: Szmidla.Google Scholar
- Ucko, P. (1996). Mother, are you there? Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 6(2), 300–304.Google Scholar
- Watson, P., & LeBlanc, S. (1971). Explanation in archaeology: an explicitly scientific approach. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Wendrich, W. (Ed.) (2013). Archaeology and apprenticeship: body knowledge, identity, and Communities of Practice. Tucson, AZ, USA: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
- Wylie, A. (2002). Thinking from things: essays in the philosophy of archaeology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar