Advertisement

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 563–588 | Cite as

Accurate Measurements of Low Z Elements in Sediments and Archaeological Ceramics Using Portable X-ray Fluorescence (PXRF)

  • Jack Johnson
Article

Abstract

This study seeks to demonstrate the ability of portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) to estimate concentrations of K, Ca, and Fe in sediments and archaeological ceramics under controlled conditions. After a discussion of the potential confounding factors in PXRF use, a protocol which attempts to address these issues through repeated measurement, calibration, and re-sampling is detailed. Data generated using this protocol are then tested for accuracy and repeatability. PXRF is argued to be able to produce accurate estimates of K provided the suggested protocol is used, and able to produce repeatable estimates of K and Ca under these same conditions. Other experimental conditions tested failed to produce accurate and repeatable results. Fe results are found to be problematic given the calibration standards used here.

Keywords

PXRF Geochemistry Sediments Ceramics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Significant assistance in statistics, calibration, and R software was provided by UW statisticians Soyoung Ryu, Paul Sampson, and Jonathan Gruhl. Sediment samples used for this study were collected during fieldwork supported by National Science Foundation DDIG #0731529. PXRF units and equipment used for this study were purchased with funds awarded by University of Washington STF Award #2008-068-1. Access to field sites in Peru was graciously given by Dr. Santiago Uceda (Universidad Nacional de Trujillo) and by Mr. Francisco Burga (Agroindustrias San Simon S.A.). Ceramic samples and ICP-MS data were made available by Dr. James Feathers (University of Washington). Jim also deserves thanks along with Dr. Donald Grayson (UW) and two anonymous reviewers for providing insightful comments on drafts.

References

  1. Abrahams, P. W., Entwistle, J. A., & Dodgshon, R. A. (2010). The Ben Lawers historic landscape project: simultaneous multi-element analysis of former settlement and arable soils by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 17(3), 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aitken, M. J. (1985). Thermoluminescence dating. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  3. Buhrke, V. E., Jenkins, R., & Smith, D. K. (Eds.). (1998). A practical guide for the preparation of specimens for X-ray fluorescence and X-ray diffraction analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Burley, D. V., Sheppard, P. J., & Simonin, M. (2011). Tongan and Samoan volcanic glass: pXRF analysis and implications for constructs of ancestral Polynesian society. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(10), 2625–2632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Craig, N., Speakman, R. J., Popelka-Filcoff, R. S., Glascock, M. D., Robertson, J. D., Shackley, S. M., & Aldenderfer, M. S. (2007). Comparison of XRF and PXRF for analysis of archaeological obsidian from southern Perú. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34(12), 2012–2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, L. G. (2011). Return to Cooper’s ferry site: studying cultural chronology, geoecology, and foragers in context. Idaho Archaeologist, 34, 1–4.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, L. G., Macfarlan, S. J., & Henrickson, C. N. (2012). A PXRF-based chemostratigraphy and provenience system for the Cooper’s Ferry site, Idaho. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(3), 663–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forster, N., & Grave, P. (2012). Non-destructive PXRF analysis of museum-curated obsidian from the Near East. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(3), 728–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frankel, D., & Webb, J. M. (2012). Pottery production and distribution in prehistoric Bronze Age Cyprus. An application of pXRF analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(5), 1380–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goodale, N., Bailey, D. G., Jones, G. T., Prescott, C., Scholz, E., Stagliano, N., & Lewis, C. (2012). pXRF: a study of inter-instrument performance. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(4), 875–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goren, Y., Mommsen, H., & Klinger, J. (2011). Non-destructive provenance study of cuneiform tablets using portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF). Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(3), 684–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lachance, G. R., & Claisse, F. (1995). Quantitative X-ray fluorescence analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Liritzis, I., & Zacharias, N. (2010). Portable XRF of archaeological artifacts: Current research, potentials and limitations. In M. S. Shackley (Ed.), X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) in geoarchaeology (pp. 109–142). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Millhauser, J. K., Rodriguez-Alegria, E., & Glascock, M. D. (2011). Testing the accuracy of portable X-ray fluorescence to study Aztec and Colonial obsidian supply at Xaltocan, Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(11), 3141–3152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Murphy, K. E., Long, S. E., Rearick, M. S., & Ertas, O. S. (2002). The accurate determination of potassium and calcium using isotope dilution inductively coupled “cold” plasma mass spectrometry. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 17(5), 469–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nazaroff, A. J., Prufer, K. M., & Drake, B. L. (2009). Assessing the applicability of portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for obsidian provenance research in the Maya lowlands. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(4), 885–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Phillips, S. C., & Speakman, R. J. (2009). Initial source evaluation of archaeological obsidian from the Kuril Islands of the Russian Far East using portable XRF. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36(6), 1256–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Polikreti, K., Murphy, J. M. A., Kantarelou, V., & Germanos Karydas, A. (2011). XRF analysis of glass beads from the Mycenaean palace of Nestor at Pylos, Peloponnesus, Greece: new insight into the LBA glass trade. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(11), 2889–2896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Potts, P. J., & West, M. (2008). Portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry: capabilities for in situ analysis. Cambridge, UK: The Royal Society of Chemistry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schuenemeyer, J. H., & Drew, L. J. (2011). Statistics for earth and environmental scientists. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Seber, G. A. F., & Lee, A. J. (2003). Linear regression analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shackley, M. S. (2010). Is there reliability and validity in portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (PXRF)? The SAA Archaeological Record, 10(5), 17–20.Google Scholar
  23. Sheppard, P. J., Irwin, G. J., Lin, S. C., & McCaffrey, C. P. (2011). Characterization of New Zealand obsidian using PXRF. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(1), 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Speakman, R. J., Little, N. C., Creel, D., Miller, M. R., & Iñañez, J. G. (2011). Sourcing ceramics with portable XRF spectrometers? A comparison with INAA using Mimbres pottery from the American Southwest. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(12), 3483–3496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations