Advertisement

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 236–255 | Cite as

After the Deep Freeze: Confronting “Magdalenian” Realities in Cantabrian Spain And Beyond

  • Lawrence Guy Straus
Article

Abstract

The Magdalenian culture-stratigraphic unit in Western Europe, despite being a construct of nineteenth-century prehistoric archeologists, does have reality as a continuous network of human inter-relationships, whose ecologically transcendent range expanded through the course of the Late Last Glacial, in many ways reminiscent of Braudel’s histoire de la longue durée—in this case lasting some 9,000 calendar years. At the scale of the moyenne durée, the Magdalenian underwent several reorganizations [represented by its Initial, Lower, Middle, Upper, Final, and Epi-Magdalenian (i.e., Azilian, Federmesser) stages]—with distinctly regional manifestations and inter-regional connections—that in part can be understood in light of environmental/resource changes and variations at the scales of millennia and natural regions. At the scale of the courte durée, we are dealing with the adaptations of local and regional hunter-gatherer bands and the peculiarities and vicissitudes of their circumstances measured by forager group territories and centuries. Numerous, diverse concrete archaeological manifestations of territories and inter-group contacts support the growing consensus about the social reality of the Magdalenian phenomenon and the changes and variations that characterized it within a range that ultimately stretched from Portugal to Poland during the last millennia of the Pleistocene. Here, the focus is on Cantabrian Spain as one of the core or source areas of the Magdalenian cultural tradition that arose out of the Solutrean experience some 20,000 calendar years ago (about a millennium later than in France) and that was intimately linked to the process of human recolonization of upland and northerly regions of western and ultimately central Europe during the course of Greenland Stadial 2 and early Greenland Interstadial 1. Finally, archaeological and paleobiological indicators clearly point to major breaks in human adaptations and ways of understanding the human place in the universe a few centuries after the onset of Holocene conditions in Vasco-Cantabria, i.e., the development of Mesolithic cultures about 11,000 calendar years ago.

Keywords

Magdalenian Cantabrian Spain Western Europe Late Last Glacial Upper Paleolithic adaptations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

My sincere thanks to Valentine Roux and Marie-Agnès Courty for their invitation to and hospitality at the very stimulating Arkeotek Workshop in Nanterre in January 2011 and for their comments on several drafts of this paper. The paper also profited greatly for the suggestions of Françoise Audouze and two anonymous reviewers. While I may not have agreed with or followed all of their diverse recommendations, the paper has evolved greatly as a result.

References

  1. Akoshima, K. (1995). Analyse des structures d’habitat de la couche 4. In L. G. Straus (Ed.), Les Derniers Chasseurs de Rennes du Monde Pyrénéen. L’Abri Dufaure (pp. 165–180). Paris: Société Préhistorique Française. Mémoire 22.Google Scholar
  2. Alday, A., Ed. (2006). El Mesolítico de Muescas y Denticulados en la Cuenca del Ebro y el Litoral Mediterráneo Peninsular. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Memorias de Yacimientos Alaveses 11.Google Scholar
  3. Altuna, J. (1995). Fauna de mamíferos y cambios ambientales durante el Tardiglaciar cantábrico. In A.Moure & C.González Sainz (Eds.), El Final del Paleolítico Cantábrico (pp.77–177). Santander: Universidad de Cantabria.Google Scholar
  4. Altuna, J. (2010). Cueva de Ekain. Arkeoikuska, 2009, 345–348.Google Scholar
  5. Alvarez, E. (2001). L’axe Rhin-Rhône au Paléolithique supérieur récent: l’exemple des mollusques utilisés comme objets de parure. L'Anthropologie, 105, 547–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alvarez, E. (2002). Perforated Homalopoma sanguineum from Tito Bustillo (Asturias): mobility of Magdalenian groups in northern Spain. Antiquity, 76, 641–646.Google Scholar
  7. Alvarez, E. (2005). ‘Eloignés mas pas isolés’: la parure hors de la ‘frontière française’ pendant le Magdalénien. In V.Dujardin (Ed.), Industrie Osseuse et Parures du Solutréen au Magdalénien en Europe. Mémoire 39 (pp. 25–38). Paris: Société Préhistorique Française.Google Scholar
  8. Andersen, K., Svennson, A., Johnsen, A., Rasmussen, S., Bigler, M., Röthlisberger, R., et al. (2006). The Greenland ice core chronology, 2005, 15–42 ka. Part 1: constructing the time scale. Quaternary Science Reviews, 25, 3246–3257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arambourou, R. (1978). Le Gisement Préhistorique de Duruthy à Sorde-l’Abbaye (Landes). Mémoire 13. Société Préhistorique Française: Paris.Google Scholar
  10. Arias, P., Ontañón, R., Alvarez, E., Aparicio, M.T., Chauvin, A., Clemente, I., Cueto, M., González, J.E., Ibañez, J.J., Tapia, J., Teira, L. (2005). La estructura magdaleniense de La Garma. Aproximación a la organización espacial de un hábitat paleolítico. In N.Bicho (Ed.), O Paleolítico: Actas do IV Congresso de Arqueologia Peninsular (pp. 123–141). Faro: Promontoria Monografica 2.Google Scholar
  11. Aura, J.E., Jordà, J., Pérez, M., Rodrigo, M.J. (2001) Sobre dunas, playas y calas. Los pescadores prehistóricos de la Cueva de Nerja (Màlaga) y su expresión arqueológica en el trànsito Pleistoceno-Holoceno. Archivo de Prehistoria Levantina, 24, 9–39.Google Scholar
  12. Bahn, P. (1983). Pyrenean prehistory. Warminster: Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar
  13. Bahn, P., Pettitt, P., & Ripoll, S. (2003). Discover of Palaeolithic cave art in Britain. Antiquity, 77, 227–231.Google Scholar
  14. Banks, W., Aubry, T., D’Errico, F., Zilhão, J., Lira-Noriega, A., & Peterson, A. T. (2011). Eco-cultural niches of the Badegoulian: unraveling links between cultural adaptation and ecology during the Last Glacial Maximum in France. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 30, 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Barandiarán, I., Freeman, L. G., González Echegaray, J., & Klein, R. (1985). Excavaciones en la Cueva del Juyo. Monografía 14. Madrid: Centro de Investigación y Museo de Altamira.Google Scholar
  16. Bintliff, J. (1991). The contribution of an Annaliste/structural history approach to archaeology. In J. Bintliff (Ed.), The Annales School and Archaeology (pp. 1–33). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bleed, P. (1986). The optimal design of hunting weapons: maintainability and reliability. American Antiquity, 51, 737–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bosinski, G. (2007). Gönnersdorf und Andernach. Koblenz: Archäologie an Mittelrhein und Mosel 19.Google Scholar
  19. Bosinski, G., & Schiller, P. (1998). Représentations féminines dans la Grotte du Planchard et les figures féminines du type Gönnersdorf dans l’art pariétal. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique de l’Ariège, 53, 99–140.Google Scholar
  20. Bosselin, B., & Djindjian, F. (1999). Une révision de la séquence de la Riera (Asturies) et la question du Badegoulien cantabrique. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, 96, 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Braudel, F. (1972). The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the age of Phillip II. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  22. Cabrera, V. (1984). El Yacimiento Prehisórico de la Cueva de El Castillo. Bibliotheca Praehistorical Hispana 22. Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
  23. Cazals, N., & Bracco, J.-P. (2007). Quelles relations de part et d’autre des Pyrénées durant le Magdalénien? In N. Cazals, J. González Urquijo, & X. Terradas (Eds.), Frontières naturelles et frontières culturelles dans les pyrénées préhistoriques (pp. 125–142). Santander: PUblican-Ediciones.Google Scholar
  24. Conkey, M. (1980). The identification of prehistoric hunter-gatherer aggregation sites: the case of Altamira. Current Anthropology, 21, 609–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Corchón, M.S. (2005a). Europa 16500–14000 a.C.: un lenguaje común. In P. Arias & R. Ontañón (Eds.) La Materia del Lenguaje Prehistórico (pp. 105–126). Santander: Gobierno de Cantabria.Google Scholar
  26. Corchón, M.S. (2005b). El Magdaleniense en la Cornisa Cantábrica: nuevas investigaciones y debates actuales. In N. Bicho (Ed.), O Paleolítico: Actas do IV Congresso de Arqueología Peninsular (pp. 15–38). Faro: Promontoria Monográfica 02.Google Scholar
  27. Corchón, M. S. (2005c). Los contornos recortados de la Cueva de Las Caldas, en el contexto del Magdaleniense medio cántabro–pirenaico. Munibe, 57(3), 113–134.Google Scholar
  28. Corchón, M.S., Rivero, O. (2008) Los rodetes del Magdaleniense medio càntabrico. Zephyrus, 61, 61–84.Google Scholar
  29. Dachary, M. (2006). Les Magdaléniens à Duruthy. Mont-de-Marsan: Conseil Général des Landes.Google Scholar
  30. de la Rasilla, M., Straus, L.G. (2007). El poblamiento de la región cantábrica en torno al Ultimo Máximo Glacial: Gravetiense y Solutrense. In M.A. Fano (Ed.), Las Sociedades del Paleolítico en la Región Cantábrica (pp. 209–242). Bilbao: Kobie, Anejo 8.Google Scholar
  31. Eriksen, B., & Bratlund, B. (Eds.). (2002). Recent studies in the Final Palaeolithic of the European Plain. Højbjerg: Jutland Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
  32. Féblot-Augustins, J. (1997). La Circulation des Matières Premières au Paléolithique. Liège: ERAUL 75 (2 tomes).Google Scholar
  33. Fernández Tresguerres, J. (2007). El final del Paleolítico en los espacios cantábricos: el Aziliense. In M. A. Fano (Ed.), Las Sociedades el Paleolítico en la Región Cantábrica (pp. 309–335). Bilbao: Kobie. Anejo 8.Google Scholar
  34. Floss, H. (1991). Sur l’approvisionnement des matières premières au Magdalénien et Paléolithique supérieur: environnement, habitat et système d’échange. ERAUL, 43, 104–113.Google Scholar
  35. Fontes, L., Straus, L.G., González Morales, M. (2012). Living “floors” and living space. Lower Cantabrian Magdalenian activity areas in the outer vestibule of El Mirón Cave. Paper presented in the Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
  36. Fortea, J. (1981). Investigaciones en la cuenca média del Nalón. Zephyrus, 32–33, 4–16.Google Scholar
  37. Freeman, L. G., & González, E. (1984). In H. Berke, J. Hahn, & C.-J. Kind (Eds.), Upper Palaeolithic settlement patterns in Europe (pp. 39–49). Tübingen: Institut für Urgeschichte, Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
  38. Freeman, L. G., & González Echegaray, J. (2001). La Grotte d’Altamira. Paris: La Maison des Roches.Google Scholar
  39. Galanidou, N. (1997). Home is where the hearth is. The spatial organization of Upper Palaeolithic rockshelter occupations at Klithi and Kastritsa in Northwest Greece. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports S-687.Google Scholar
  40. González Morales, M. (1991). From hunter-gatherers to food producers in northern Spain: smooth adaptive shifts or revolutionary change in the Mesolithic? In G. A. Clark (Ed.), Perspectives on the past (pp. 204–216). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  41. González Morales, M., & Straus, L. G. (2009). Extraordinary early Magdalenian finds from El Mirón Cave, Cantabria, Spain. Antiquity, 83, 267–281.Google Scholar
  42. González Morales, M., Straus, L.G., Marín, A.B. (2007). Los omóplatos decorados magdalenienses de la Cueva del Mirón y su relación con las cuevas del Castillo, Altamira y El Juyo. In J.M. Maíllo & E. Baquedano (Eds.), Miscelánea en Homenaje a Victoria Cabrera. Zona Arqueológica 7 (pp. 482–495). Alcalá de Henares: Museo Arqueológico Regional.Google Scholar
  43. González Sainz, C. (2005). Actividad gráfica magdaleniense en la región cantábrica. Datación y modificaciones iconográficas. In N. Bicho (Ed.), O Paleolítico. Actas do IV Congresso de Arqueologia Peninsular (pp. 157–181). Faro: Promontoria Monográfica 02.Google Scholar
  44. González Sainz, C. (2007). Arte parietal en la región cantábrica. In M.A. Fano (Ed.), Las Sociedades del Paleolítico en la Región Cantábrica (pp. 403–424). Bilbao: Kobie, Anejo 8.Google Scholar
  45. González Sainz, C., Utrilla, P. (2005). Problemas actuales en la organización y datación del Magdaleniense en la región cantábrica. In N. Bicho (Ed.), O Paleolítico. Actas do IV Congresso de Arqueologia Peninsular (pp. 39–47). Faro: Promontoria Monográfica 02.Google Scholar
  46. Housley, R., Gamble, C., Street, M., & Pettitt, P. (1997). Radiocarbon evidence for the late glacial human recolonisation of Northern Europe. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 63, 25–54.Google Scholar
  47. Jochim, M., Herhahn, C., & Starr, H. (1999). The Magdalenian colonization of Southern Germany. American Anthropologist, 101, 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Keeley, L. (1988). Lithic economy, style and use: a comparison of three late (sic) Magdalenian sites. Lithic Technology, 17, 19–25.Google Scholar
  49. Langlais, M. (2011). Processes of change in Magdalenian Societies in the Pyrenean isthmus (20–16 ky cal BP). Antiquity, 85, 715–728.Google Scholar
  50. Lasheras, J. A., Montes, R., Muñoz, E., Rasines, P., De Las Heras, C., & Fatas, P. (2005/06). El proyecto científico Los Tiempos de Altamira: primeros resultados. Munibe, 57(3), 143–159.Google Scholar
  51. LeBrun-Ricalens, F., Bracco, J.-P., & Brou, L. (2006). Burins carénés, grattoirs carénés et formes associées: un retournement. In M. de Araujo, J.-P. Bracco, & F. LeBrun-Ricalens (Eds.), Burins Préhistoriques (pp. 345–356). Luxembourg: Musée National d’Histoire et d’Art.Google Scholar
  52. Leesch, D., Cattin, M-I., Müller, W. (2004). Témoins dImplantations Magdaléniennes et Aziliennes sur la Rive Nord du Lac de Neuchâtel. Neuchâtel: Archéologie Neuchâteloise 31.Google Scholar
  53. Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1983). Le Fil du Temps. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  54. Marín, A. B. (2010). Arqueozoología en el Cantábrico Oriental durante la Transición Pleistoceno/Holoceno. Santander: Universidad de Cantabria.Google Scholar
  55. Nakazawa, Y., Straus, L., González Morales, M., Cuenca, D., & Caro, J. (2009). On stone-boiling technology in the Upper Paleolithic: behavioral implications from an Early Magdalenian hearth in El Mirón Cave, Cantabria, Spain. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 684–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Olive, M., Valentin, B. (Eds.) (2005). Variabilité des Habitats Tardiglaciaires dans le Bassin Parisien et ses Alentours: Quelles Significations? Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 103 (pp. 667–702). Paris.Google Scholar
  57. Otte, M., Straus, L.G. (1997). La Grotte du Bois Laiterie. Liège: ERAUL 80.Google Scholar
  58. Peebles, C. (1991). Annalistes, hermeneutics and positivists: squaring circles or dissolving problems. In J. Bintliff (Ed.), The Annales School and Archaeology (pp. 108–124). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rensink, E. (1993). Moving into the North: Magdalenian occupation and exploitation of the loess landscapes of Northwestern Europe. Leiden: Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden.Google Scholar
  60. Scheer, A. (1993). The organization of lithic resource use during the Gravettian in Germany. In H. Knecht, A. Pike-Tay, & R. White (Eds.), Before Lascaux (pp. 193–210). Boca Raton: CRC.Google Scholar
  61. Schild, R. (1996). The North European Plain and eastern Sub-Balticum between 12,700 and 8,000 BP. In L. Straus, B. Eriksens, J. Erlandson, & D. Yesner (Eds.), Humans at the end of the ice age (pp. 129–158). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schwendler, R. (2005). Magdalenian perforated bone disks in geographic and social contexts. In V. Dujardin (Ed.), Industrie Osseuse et Parures du Solutréen au Magdalénien en Europe. Mémoire 39 (pp. 73–84). Paris: Société Préhistorique Française.Google Scholar
  63. Straus, L. G. (1979). Caves: a paleoanthropological resource. World Archaeology, 10, 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Straus, L.G. (1983). El Solutrense Vasco-Cantábrico. Monografía 10. Madrid: Centro de Investigación y Museo de Altamira.Google Scholar
  65. Straus, L. G. (1986). Late Würm adaptive systems in Cantabrian Spain. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 5, 330–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Straus, L. G. (1987). Upper Paleolithic ibex hunting in SW Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science, 14, 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Straus, L. G. (1990). Underground archaeology. In M. Schiffer (Ed.), Archaeological method and theory (vol. 2, pp. 255–304). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  68. Straus, L. G. (1991). Southwestern Europe at the Last Glacial Maximum. Current Anthropology, 32, 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Straus, L. G. (1992). Iberia before the Iberians. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  70. Straus, L. G. (1995). Les Derniers Chasseurs de Rennes du Monde Pyrénéen: L’Abri Dufaure, un Gisement Tardiglaciaire en Gascogne. Mémoire 22. Paris: Société Préhistorique Française.Google Scholar
  71. Straus, L. G. (1996). In L. Straus, B. Eriksen, J. Erlandson, & D. Yesner (Eds.), The archaeology of the Pleistocene–Holocene transition in Southwest Europe (pp. 83–99). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  72. Straus, L. G. (1997). Convenient cavities: some human uses of caves and rockshelters. In C. Bonsall & C. Tolan-Smith (Eds.), The human use of caves (pp. S-667–S-668). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
  73. Straus, L. G. (2000). A quarter-century of research on the Solutrean of Vasco-Cantabria, Iberia and beyond. Journal of Anthropological Research, 56, 39–58.Google Scholar
  74. Straus, L. G. (2010). The Mesolithic of Atlantic Iberia. In G. Bailey & P. Spikins (Eds.), Mesolithic Europe (2nd ed., pp. 302–331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Straus, L. G. (2011). Were there human response to Younger Dryas in Cantabrian Spain? Quaternary International, 242, 328–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Straus, L.G., Clark, G.A. (1986). La Riera Cave. Tempe: Anthropological Research Papers 36.Google Scholar
  77. Straus, L. G., & Clark, G. A. (2000). La grotte de la Riera (Asturies) et la question du Solutréen cantabrique (et ibérique). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, 97, 129–132.Google Scholar
  78. Straus, L. G., & Goebel, T. (2011). Human responses to Younger Dryas in the Northern Hemisphere. Oxford: Quaternary International, 242(2).Google Scholar
  79. Straus, L. G., & González Morales, M. (2003). El Mirón Cave and the 14C chronology of Cantabrian Spain. Radiocarbon, 45, 41–58.Google Scholar
  80. Straus, L. G., & González Morales, M. (2007a). Further radiocarbon dates for the Upper Paleolithic of El Mirón Cave. Radiocarbon, 49, 1205–1214.Google Scholar
  81. Straus, L.G., González Morales, M. (2007b). Early Tardiglacial human uses of El Mirón Cave. In M. Kornfeld, S. Vasil’ev, L. Miotti (Eds.), pp. 83–93. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (XV UISPP Congress Proceedings, vol. 14).Google Scholar
  82. Straus, L. G., & González Morales, M. (2008). Addendum and correction to ‘Early Magalenian variability’. Journal of Field Archaeology, 33, 367–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Straus, L. G., & González Morales, M. (2010). The radiocarbon chronology of El Mirón Cave: new dates for the Initial Magdalenian occupations. Radiocarbon, 52, 33–39.Google Scholar
  84. Straus, L. G., & González Morales, M. (2012). El Mirón cave: the site and its Holocene archaeological record. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  85. Straus, L. G., Bicho, N., & Winegardner, A. (2000a). The upper Paleolithic settlement of Iberia: first-generation maps. Antiquity, 74, 553–566.Google Scholar
  86. Straus, L. G., Bicho, N., & Winegardner, A. (2000b). Mapping the upper Paleolithic regions of Iberia. Journal of Iberian Archaeology, 2, 7–42.Google Scholar
  87. Straus, L. G., González Morales, M., Farrand, W., & Hubbard, W. (2001). Sedimentological and stratigraphic observations in El Mirón, a late Quaternary cave site in the Cantabrian Cordillera, northern Spain. Geoarchaeology, 16, 603–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Straus, L. G., González Morales, M., & Stewart, E. (2008). Early Magdalenian variability: new evidence from El Mirón Cave, Cantabria, Spain. Journal of Field Archaeology, 33, 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Svensson, A., Andersen, K., Bigler, M., Clausen, H., Dahl-Jensen, D., Davies, S., et al. (2006). The Greenland ice core chronology 205, 15–42 ka. Part 2: comparison to other records. Quaternary Science Reviews, 25, 3258–3267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Taborin, Y. (Ed.)(1994). Environnements et Habitats Magdaléniens dans le Centre du Bassin Parisien. Paris: Documents d’Archéologie Française 43.Google Scholar
  91. Utrilla, P. (1984). ¿Es un útil el raspador nucleiforme? In Primeras Jornadas de Metodología de Investigación Prehistórica (pp. 169–174). Soria.Google Scholar
  92. Utrilla, P. (1996). La sistematización del Magdaleniense cantábrico: una revisión histórica de los datos. In A. Moure (Ed.), ‘El Hombre Fósil’ 80 Años Después (pp. 211–247). Santander: Universidad de Cantabria.Google Scholar
  93. Utrilla, P. (1997). Le couloir de l’Ebre après le Pléniglaciaire: influences méditerranéennes et atlantiques. In J. M. Fullola & N. Soler (Eds.), El Món Mediterrani després del Pleniglacial (pp. 431–443). Girona: Museu d’Arqueologia de Catalunya.Google Scholar
  94. Utrilla, P. (2007). Evolución histórica de las sociedades cantábricas durante el Tardiglacial: el Magdaleniense inicial, inferior y medio. In M.A. Fano (Ed.), Las Sociedades del Paleolítico en la Región Cantábrica, pp. 243–274. Bilbao: Kobie, Anejo 8.Google Scholar
  95. Utrilla, P., López, P., Mazo, C. (1986). Interpretación microespacial de una ocupación magdaleniense a través de análisis polínicos y huellas de uso. In Arqueología Espacial. Coloquio sobre el Microespacio II, vol. 8, pp. 41–60. Teruel.Google Scholar
  96. Zubrow, E., Audouze, F., & Enloe, J. (2010). The Magdalenian household. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anthropology, MSC01 1040University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations