Skip to main content
Log in

High Dynamic Range Imaging for Archaeological Recording

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper notes the adoption of digital photography as a primary recording means within archaeology, and reviews some issues and problems that this presents. Particular attention is given to the problems of recording high-contrast scenes in archaeology and high dynamic range imaging using multiple exposures is suggested as a means of providing an archive of high-contrast scenes that can later be tone-mapped to provide a variety of visualisations. Exposure fusion is also considered, although it is noted that this has some disadvantages. Three case studies are then presented: (1) a very high-contrast photograph taken from within a rock-cut tomb at Cala Morell, Menorca, (2) an archaeological test pitting exercise requiring rapid acquisition of photographic records in challenging circumstances and (3) legacy material consisting of three differently exposed colour positive (slide) photographs of the same scene. In each case, high dynamic range (HDR) methods are shown to significantly aid the generation of a high-quality illustrative record photograph, and it is concluded that HDR imaging could serve an effective role in archaeological photographic recording, although there remain problems of archiving and distributing HDR radiance map data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, A. (1970). Basic photo (1st ed.). Hastings-on-Hudson: Morgan & Morgan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P., Butler, Y., & Farace, J. (2006). Raw workflow from capture to archives: a complete digital photographer’s guide to raw imaging. Oxford: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BAJR (2006). Short Guide to Digital Photography in Archaeology. BAJR Guide. British Archaeological Jobs Resource. Traprain House, East Lothian, UK.

  • Brown, D. H. (2007). Archaeological archives: A guide to best practice in creation, compilation, transfer and curation. London: Institute of Field Archaeologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. N. (2010) Digital camera sensor performance summary. Available at: (http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/digital.sensor.performance.summary/). Accessed 15 October 2010.

  • Conlon, V. M. (1973). Camera techniques in archaeology. London: J. Baker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cookson, M. B. (1954). Photography for archaeologists. London: Parrish.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debevec, P., & Malik, J. (2008). Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs. SIGGRAPH ’08: ACM SIGGRAPH, classes (pp. 1–10). Los Angeles: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digital preservation coalition (2010) Digital preservation coalition web site. Available at: (http://www.dpconline.org/). Accessed 15 October 2010.

  • Dorrell, P. G. (1989). Photography in archaeology and conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorrell, P. G. (1994). Photography in archaeology and conservation (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, G., Beale, G., Martinez, K., & Pagi, H. (2010). Polynomial texture mapping and related imaging technologies for the recording, analysis and presentation of archaeological materials (pp. 218–223). Newcastle Upon Tyne: Commission V Symposium. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, G., Martinez, K., & Malzbender, T. (2010). Archaeological applications of polynomial texture mapping: analysis, conservation and representation. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 2040–2050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ester, M. (1996). Digital image collections: Issues and practice. Washington, DC: Commission on Preservation and Access.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, L. J. (2009a). Photography for archaeologists. Part I: Site specific. BAJR Practical Guides. Traprain House, East Lothian, UK

  • Fischer, L. J. (2009b). Photography for archaeologists. Part II Artefact recording. BAJR Practical Guides. Traprain House, East Lothian, UK

  • HDR (2010) HDR Photomatix website. Available at: (http://www.hdrsoft.com/). Accessed 15 October 2010.

  • Howell, C. L., & Blanc, W. (1992). A practical guide to archaeological photography. Los Angeles: Institute of Archaeology, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, G. S. (2000). Preserving digital information: A how-to-do-it manual. New York: Neal-Schuman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, S. (2001). A simple technique for visualising three dimensional models in landscape contexts. Internet Archaeology 10. Available at: (http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue10/jeffrey_index.html). Accessed June 2010.

  • JISC (2010). JISC digital media website. Available at: (http://www.jiscdigitalmedia.ac.uk/). Accessed 15 October 2010.

  • Kenney, A. R., & Rieger, O. Y. (2000). Moving theory into practice: Digital imaging for libraries and archives. Mountain View: Research Libraries Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, T., & Reinhard, E. (2010). A reassessment of the simultaneous dynamic range of the human visual system. Los Angeles: ACM symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, P. F. (2009). Digital convergence - libraries, archives, and museums in the information age. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, T., Kautz, J., & Van Reeth, F. (2009). Exposure fusion: a simple and practical alternative to high dynamic range photography. Computer Graphics Forum, 28(1), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsunaga, T., & Nayar, S. K. (1999). Radiometric self calibration (pp. 374–380). Fort Collins: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’99).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, D. (1998). Virtually new: creating the digital collection; a review of digitisation projects in local authority libraries and archives. London: Library and Information Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, J. (2008). Archaeological excavation in the World Heritage Site. In S. Simmonds (Ed.), Avebury World Heritage Site: Values and voices (pp. 10–12). Devizes: Kennet District Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard, E., Ward, G., Pattanaik, S., Debevec, P., Heidrich, W., & Myszkowski, K. (2010). High dynamic range imaging: Acquisition, display, and image-based lighting (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. D., & Robinson, D. (2000). Digital archives from excavation and fieldwork: a guide to good practice (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlitz, M. (2007). Archaeological photography. In M. R. Peres (Ed.), The focal encyclopedia of photography: digital imaging, theory and applications history and science (4th ed.). Oxford: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seetzen, H., Whitehead, L., Ward, G. (2003). A high dynamic range display using low and high resolution modulators. In: Society for Information Display Symposium, Baltimore Convention Center, Baltimore, Maryland. pp. 1450–1453

  • Topping, A. (2009). Mama, they’ve taken away my nice bright Kodachrome colours: Kodak ends production of film loved by photographers and remembered in Paul Simon song. Manchester: The Guardian (Newspaper article).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, G. (2008). Imaging the invisible using modified digital still cameras for straightforward and low-cost archaeological near-infrared photography. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(12), 3087–3100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, G. (2010). It’s all about the format - unleashing the power of RAW aerial photography. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31(8), 2009–2042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolliscroft, D. (2010). Thoughts on the suitability of digital photography for archaeological recording. IFA Website. Available at: (www.archaeologistsnet/modules/icontent/). Institute for Archaeologists. Accessed 15 October 2010.

Download references

Acknowledgements

A number of colleagues have commented on this manuscript, and I am particularly grateful to Graeme Earl and Tom Goskar for their useful input. Thanks are also due to Geraldine Joffre of the Photomatix Engineering team and to the Southampton University students and supervisors for their interest in and help with HDR recording experiments during the Itchen Abbas excavation project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Wheatley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wheatley, D. High Dynamic Range Imaging for Archaeological Recording. J Archaeol Method Theory 18, 256–271 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-010-9100-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-010-9100-1

Keywords

Navigation