Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Archaeological Visualization: Towards an Archaeological Information Science (AISc)

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews and evaluates the potential use of modern visualization techniques in archaeology. It suggests the need to apply and develop such techniques as a central part of any modern archaeological investigation. The use of these methods is associated with wider questions about data representations, in particular, their integration with archaeological theory and their role in facilitating analysis and shaping interpretation. Concern for these questions and with the overall potential that information systems provide to capture, represent, analyze, and model archaeological information suggests the need for a new interdisciplinary focus, Archaeological Information Science. For such a focus to prosper, archaeologists need to develop additional skills that go beyond mere technical ones. They need to become more active in the design and creation of future information archaeological systems. To this end, archaeologists are urged to view this task as a way to extend archaeology in new directions and to recognize that the digital representation and treatment of archaeological information can generate new forms of doing archaeology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., Jankowski, P., Keim, D., Kraak, M.-J., & MacEachren, A. (2007). Visual analytics for spatial decision support: Setting the research agenda. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21(8), 839–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, G. (2007). Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26, 198–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barceló, J. A., & Vicente, O. (2004). Some problems in archaeological excavation 3D modeling. In K. F. Ausserer, W. Börner, M. Goriany, & L. Karlhuber-Vöckl (Eds.), Enter the past: The e-vay into the four dimensions of cultural heritage CAA 2003, Computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology. BAR international series 1227 (pp. 400–404). Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barceló, J. A., Forte, M., Sanders, D. (2000). Virtual Reality in archaeology. Oxford: BAR International Series 843, Archaeopress.

  • Barrett, J. C. (1987). Contextual archaeology. Antiquity, 61(233), 468–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. C. (1994). Fragments from antiquity: An archaeology of social life in Britain 2900–1200 BC. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benko, H., Ishak, E. W., & Feiner, S. (2004). Collaborative mixed reality visualization of an archaeological excavation. In 3rd IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2004), 2–5 November 2004 (pp. 132–140). Arlington: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertin, J. [1967] (1983). Semiology of graphics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

  • Boucher de Perthes, J. (1847). Antiquites celtiques et antediluvienes. Memoire sur l’industrie primitive et les arts a leur origine, vol. 10. Paris: Treuttel and Wertz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodlie, K. W., Carpenter, L. A., Earnshaw, R. A., Gallop, J. R., Hubbard, R. J., Mumford, A. M., et al. (Eds.). (1992). Scientific visualization, techniques and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1973). Method, model and matter. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (1999). Information visualization: Beyond the horizon. London: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chippindale, C. (2000). Capta and data: On the true nature of archaeological information. American Antiquity, 65, 605–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W. S. (1994). The elements of graphing data (2nd ed.). Lafayette: Hobart Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Close, A. E. (2006). Finding the people who flaked the stone at english camp (San Juan Island). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couclelis, H. (1992). People manipulate objects (but cultivate fields): Beyond the raster-vector debate in GIS. In A. U. Frank, I. Campari, & U. Formentini (Eds.), Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space. Lecture notes in computational science 639 (pp. 65–77). Pisa: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crescioli, M., Niccolucci, F., & D’Andrea, A. (2002). XML Encoding of archaeological unstructured data. In G. Burenhult (Ed.), Archaeological informatics: Pushing the envelope CAA2001. Computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology. BAR International series 1016 (pp. 267–275). Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criado Boado, F., & Villoch Vázquez, V. (2000). Monumentalizing landscape: From present perception to the past meaning of galician megalithism (NW Iberian Peninsula). European Journal of Archaeology, 3(2), 188–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, V., Jones, A., & Watson, A. (2002). Divided places: Phenomenology and asymmetry in the monuments of the Black Mountains, Southeast Wales. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 12, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMarrais, E. (1996). The Materialization of Culture. In E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden, & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Rethinking materiality: The engagement of mind with the material world (pp. 11–21). Cambridge: MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H. L., & McPherron, S. P. (1988). On the computerization of archaeological projects. Journal of Field Archaeology, 15(4), 431–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobres, M., & Robb, J. (Eds.). (2000). Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykes, J., MacEachren, A., & Kraak, M.-J. (2005). Exploring geovisualization. Oxford: Elsevier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, G. P., & Wheatley, D. W. (2002). Virtual reconstruction and the interpretative process: A case-study from Avebury. In D. W. Wheatley, G. P. Earl, & S. Poppy (Eds.), Contemporary themes in archaeological computing (pp. 5–15). Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fekete, J-D., van Wijk, J. J., Stasko, J. T., North, C. (2008). The value of information visualization. In A. Kerren, J-D. Fekete, J.T. Stasko, C. North (Eds.), Information visualization:Human centered issues and perspectives. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4950: 1–18.

  • Forte, M. (Ed.). (1997). Virtual archaeology: Great discoveries brought to life through virtual reality. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischer, B. (2008). Introduction: From digital illustration to digital heuristics. In B. Frischer & A. Dakouri-Hild (Eds.), Beyond illustration: 2d and 3d Digital Technologies as Tools for Discovery in Archaeology (para 1.44). Oxford: Archaeopress. (http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.90045).

  • Frischer, B., & Dakouri-Hild, A. (2008). Beyond illustration: 2d and 3d digital technologies as tools for discovery in archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress. (http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.90045)

  • Gaffney, C. (2008). Detecting trends in the prediction of the buried past: A review of geophysical techniques in archaeology. Archaeometry, 50(2), 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillings, M. (2004). The real, the virtually real and the hyperreal: The role of VR in archaeology. In S. Moser & S. Smiles (Eds.), Envisioning the past (pp. 223–239). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillings, M., & Goodrick, G.T. (1996). Sensuous and Reflexive GIS: Exploring Visualisation and VRML. Internet Archaeology 1.

  • Gooding, D. C. (2008). Envisioning explanation: The art in science. In B. Frischer & A. Dakouri-Hild (Eds.), Beyond illustration: 2d and 3d Digital Technologies as Tools for Discovery in Archaeology (para. 45–74). Oxford: Archaeopress. (http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.90045)

  • Goodrick, G., & Gillings, M. (2000). Constructs, simulations and hyperreal worlds: the role of virtual reality (VR) in archaeological research. In G. Lock & K. Brown (Eds.), On the theory and practice of archaeological computing (pp. 41–48). Oxford: OUCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosden, C., & Marshall, Y. (1999). The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology, 31(2), 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J., & Walford, K. (1999). One Good Site Deserves Another: Electronic Publishing in Field Archaeology. Internet Archaeology 7.

  • Grayson, D. K. (1984). Quantitative zooarchaeology: Topics in the analysis of archaeological faunas. Orlando: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S., Whitehouse, R., Brown, K., Combes, P., Herring, E., & Thomas, M. S. (2006). Phenomenology in practice: Towards a methodology for a ‘subjective’ approach. European Journal of Archaeology, 9(1), 31–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. (1989). Principles of archaeological stratigraphy. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrower, M., & Fabrikant, S. (2008). The role of map animation for geographic visualization. In D. M. Dodge, M. McDerby, & M. Turner (Eds.), Geographic visualization: Concepts, tools and applications. London: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbing, D., Keltsch, J., & Molnár, P. (1997). Modelling the evolution of human trail systems. Nature, 388, 47–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1987). The archaeology of contextual meanings. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1999). The archaeological process. An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway, S., & Wandsnider, L. (2008). Time in archaeology: Time perspectivism revisited. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, O., Feliciano Santiago, I., Kraak, M.-J., & Retsios, B. (2009). Developing a geovisual analytics environment for investigating archaeological events: Extending the space-time cube. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 36(3), 225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, L., Martinez, K., Gibbins, N. Earl, G., Keay, S., (forthcoming). Linking Archaeological Data. Proceedings Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA) 2009. Williamburg.

  • Jefferey, S., & Aitchison, K. (2008). Who works in digital archaeology?. Archaeological Data Service News, 22 (http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/newsletter/issue22/jeffery.html)

  • Johnson, B., & Shneiderman, B. (1991). Treemaps: A Space Filling Approach to the Visualization of Hierarchical Information Structures. In Proceedings., IEEE Conference on Visualization, Issue 22–25 (pp. 284 91). IEEE Press.

  • Jones, A. (2007). Memory and material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kintigh, K. W. (2006). The promise and challenge of archaeological data integration. American Antiquity, 71(3), 567–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, T. A., & Gumerman, G. J. (Eds.). (2000). Dynamics in human societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, T. A., & van der Leeuw, S. E. (2007). The model-based archaeology of socionatural systems. Santa Fe: SAR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life in things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 64–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leucci, G., & Negri, S. (2006). Use of ground penetrating radar to map subsurface archaeological features in an urban area. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 502–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1938). The conceptual representation and the measurement of psychological forces. Durnham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper and Bros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llobera, M. (2007). Reconstructing visual landscapes. World Archaeology, 39(1), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lock, G. (2003). Using computers in archaeology: towards virtual pasts. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, G., & Harris, T. (1992). Visualizing spatial data: the importance of geographic information systems. In P. Reilly & S. P. Q. Rahtz (Eds.), Archaeology and the information age: a global perspective (pp. 81–96). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losier, L.-M., Pouliot, J., & Fortin, M. (2007). 3D geometrical modeling of excavation units at the archaeological site of Tell ‘Acharneh (Syria). Journal of Archaeological Science, 34, 272–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, G. (2001). Critical approaches to fieldwork: Contemporary and historical archaeological practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, G. (2005). The archaeology of time. Themes in archaeology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., & Woolgar, S. (Eds.). (1990). Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManamon, F. P., & Kintigh, K. W. (2010). Digital antiquity: Transforming archaeological data into knowledge. SAA Archaeological Record, 10(2), 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherron, S. J. P., & Dibble, H. L. (2000). The lithic assemblages of Pech de L’Azé IV (Dordogne, France). Préhistoire Européen, 15, 9–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherron, S. J. P., Dibble, H. L., & Goldberg, P. (2005). Z. Geoarchaeology, 20(3), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (2004). Divine Things. In E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden, & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Rethinking materiality: The engagement of mind with the material world (pp. 249–260). Oxford: McDonald Institute Monographs, Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. J., & Wentz, E. A. (2003). Representation and Spatial Analysis in geographic information systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93, 574–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H. L. (1986). Space, text and gender: An anthropological study of the Marakwet of Kenya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, S., & Smiles, S. (Eds.). (2005). Envisioning the past: Archaeology and the image. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niccolucci, F. (Ed.). (2002). Virtual archaeology proceedings of the VAST Euroconference, Arezzo 24–26 November 2000. Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, C. (1982). Computer simulation experiments to assess the performance of measures of quantity of pottery. World Archaeology, 14, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orton, C. (1993). How many pots make five: An historical review of pottery quantification. Archaeometry, 35, 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, P., & Rahtz, S. (1992). Archaeology in the Information Age: A Global Perspective. One World Archaeology 21. London: Routledge.

  • Richards, J. D. (2006). Archaeology, e-publication and the Semantic Web. Antiquity, 80, 970–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (1972). Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity, 37, 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. A. (1991). Problems with the use of flake size in inferring stages of lithic reduction. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 13, 177–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. R., Gahegan, M., Giles, C. L., Hirth, K. G., Milner, G. R., Mitra, P., et al. (2006). Information science: Enhanced: Cybertools and archaeology. Science, 311(5763), 958–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J., & Cook, K.A. (Eds.), (2005). Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. IEEE CS Press.

  • Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. (1997). Visual explanations. Cheshire: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E.R. [1983] (1998). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. 2nd Ed. Cheshire: Graphics Press.

  • Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraasen, B. C. (2008). Scientific representation: Paradoxes of perspective. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterbottom, S. J., & Long, D. (2006). From abstract digital models to rich virtual environments: landscape contexts in Kilmartin Glen, Scotland. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 1356–1367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P., & Thomas, J. (2004). Visual Analytics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 24(5), 20–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1999). Rethinking unity as a “Working Hypothesis” for philosophy of science: How archaeologists exploit the disunities of science. Perspectives on Science, 7, 293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (2002). Thinking from things: Essays in the philosophy of archaeology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarrow, T. (2008). In context: Meaning, materiality and agency in the process of archaeological recording. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Material agency: towards a nonanthropocentric approach (pp.121–138). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Denny 32, Box 353100, Seattle, WA, 98195-3100, USA

    Marcos Llobera

Authors
  1. Marcos Llobera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcos Llobera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Llobera, M. Archaeological Visualization: Towards an Archaeological Information Science (AISc). J Archaeol Method Theory 18, 193–223 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-010-9098-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-010-9098-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation