Skip to main content
Log in

Agents in Inter-Action: Bruno Latour and Agency

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to describe Bruno Latour's contributions to the theory and methodology of agency in the Philosophy of Science and to apply them to the study of agency in archaeology. These contributions include an understanding of how artifacts or representations of the world emerge, what the best conditions to study them under are and how to understand the process of change they undergo. A case study using the Hopewell burial mounds of the Lower Illinois Valley will serve to demonstrate the application of this methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barclay, G. (2002). Introduction, in special section. Antiquity 76: 777–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (1977). The past and the present in the present. Man (N.S.) 13: 278–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdillon, M. (1978). Knowing the world or hiding it: A response to Maurice Bloch. Man (N.S.) 13: 291–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. (1993). Altering the Earth: The origins of monuments in Britain and Continental Europe, Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buikstra, J. E. (1976). Hopewell in the Lower Illinois Valley: A regional study of human biological variability and prehistoric mortuary behavior, Northwestern Archaeological Program Scientific Papers, Evanston.

  • Buikstra, J. E., Charles, D. K., and Rakita, G. (1998). Staging Ritual: Hopewell Ceremonialism at the Mound House Site, Greene County, Illinois, Center for American Archaeology, Kampsville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buikstra, J. E., and Charles, D. K. (1999). Centering the ancestors: Cemeteries, mounds, and sacred landscapes of the ancient North American midcontinent. In Ashmore, W., and Knapp, A. (eds.), Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary perspectives, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 201–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullington, J. (1988). Middle Woodland mound structure: Social implications and regional context. In Charles, D. K., Leigh, S.R., and Buikstra, J. E. (eds.), The Archaic and Woodland Cemeteries at the Elizabeth Site in the Lower Illinois Valley, Center for American Archaeology, Kampsville, pp. 218–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, D. K. (1985). Corporate Symbols: An Interpretive Prehistory Indian Burial Mounds in West-Central Illinois, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Chicago.

  • Charles, D. K. (1992). Woodland demographic and social dynamics in the American Midwest: Analysis of a burial mound survey. World Archaeology 24: 175–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, D. K., Buikstra, J. E., and Konigsberg, L. W. (1986). Behavioral implications of terminal Archaic and Early Woodland mortuary practices in the Lower Illinois Valley. In Farnsworth, K., and Emerson, T. (eds.), Early Woodland Archaeology, Center for American Archaeology Press, Kampsville, pp. 458–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, G. (2001). Bringing contemporary baggage to Neolithic landscapes. In Bender, B., and Winer, M. (eds.), Contested Landscapes: Movement, Exile and Place, Berg, Oxford, pp. 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (1977). Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context, (2nd ed.), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, (1st ed.), John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, L. (1985). On the possibility of social class in societies based on extractive subsistence. In Thompson, M., and Garcia, F. (eds.), Status, Structure and Stratification: Current Archaeological Reconstructions, University of Calgary Archaeological Association, Calgary, pp. 237–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagles, B., and Field, D. (2004). William Cunnington and the long barrows of the River Wylye. In Cleal, R. M. J., and Pollard, J. (eds.), Monuments and Material Culture, Hobnob Press, Salisbury, pp. 47–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. (1988). Mixing humans and nonhumans together: the sociology of a door-closer. Social Problems 35: 298–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2002). Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice, University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2001a). Progress or Entanglement? Two models for the long term evolution of human civilization. In Tien, H., and Lo, C. (eds.), Challenges of Civilization in the 21st Century, Institute for National Policy Research, Taiwan, pp. 311–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2001b). Gabriel Tarde and the end of the social. In Joyce, P. (ed.), The Social and its Problem, Routledge, London.

  • Latour, B. (2004). A prologue in form of a dialog between a Student and his (somewhat) Socratic Professor, Bruno Latour's official website, http://www.ensmp.fr/%7Elatour/articles/article/090.html.

  • Leigh, S. R., Charles, D. K., and Albertson, D. G. (1988). Middle Woodland component. In Charles, D. K., Leigh, S. R., and Buikstra, J. E. (eds.), The Archaic and Woodland Cemeteries at the Elizabeth Site in the Lower Illinois Valley, Center for American Archaeology, Kampsville, pp. 41–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. M. (2002). Rethinking the Illinois Hopewell: A Constructive Comparison with Approaches from British Archaeology and Bruno Latour. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

  • Perino, G. H. (1966). Unpublished excavation report of the Montezuma Mounds site in west-central Illinois, manuscript on file, Center for American Archaeology, Kampsville.

  • Perino, G. H. (1968). The Pete Klunk Mound Group, Calhoun County, Illinois: The archaic and hopewell occupations. In Illinois Archaeological Survey Bulletin 6, Hopewell and Woodland Site Archaeology in Illinois, University of Illinois, Urbana, pp. 9–124.

  • Perino, G. H. (1970). Unpublished excavation report of the Gibson and Bedford Mounds site in west-central Illinois, manuscript on file, Center for American Archaeology, Kampsville.

  • Stafford, B. (1985). Summary. In Stafford, B., and Sant, M. (eds.), Smiling Dan: structure and function at a Middle Woodland settlement in the Illinois Valley, Center for American Archaeology, Kampsville, pp. 447–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strum, S., and Latour, B. (1987). Redefining the social link: from baboons to humans. Social Science Information 26: 783–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tainter, J. A. (1978). Mortuary practices and the study of prehistoric social systems. In Schiffer, M. (ed.), Advances in archaeological method and theory (Vol. 1), Academic Press, New York, pp. 105–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tainter, J. A. (1980). Behavior and Status in a Middle Woodland Mortuary Population from the Illinois Valley. American Antiquity 45: 308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarde, G. (1999 re-edition). Les Lois Sociales, Les empêcheurs de penser en rond, Paris.

  • Turner, V. (1969). The Ritual Process: structure and anti-structure, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Nest, J., Charles, D. K., Buikstra, J. E., and Asch, D. L. (2001). Sod blocks in Illinois Hopewell Mounds. American Antiquity 66: 633–650.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Martin Dr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, A. Agents in Inter-Action: Bruno Latour and Agency. J Archaeol Method Theory 12, 283–311 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-005-8450-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-005-8450-6

Keywords

Navigation