Skip to main content
Log in

The widening gap between perceptions of gamete and embryo quality and reality

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Coticchio G, Sereni E, Serrao L, Mazzone S, Iadarola I, Borini A. What criteria for the definition of oocyte quality? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1034:132–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Telfer EE, Grosbois J, Odey YL, Rosario R, Anderson RA. Making a good egg: human oocyte health, aging, and in vitro development. Physiol Rev. 2023;103(4):2623–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Inge GB, Brinsden PR, Elder KT. Oocyte number per live birth in IVF: were Steptoe and Edwards less wasteful? Hum Reprod. 2005;20(3):588–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Patrizio P, Sakkas D. From oocyte to baby: a clinical evaluation of the biological efficiency of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(4):1061–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David F. Albertini.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

NA

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albertini, D.F. The widening gap between perceptions of gamete and embryo quality and reality. J Assist Reprod Genet 40, 2281–2282 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02929-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02929-2

Navigation