Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gene expression and demographic analyses in women with the poor ovarian response: a computational approach

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Poor response to ovarian stimulation (POR) typically is reflected as decreased follicular response and low estradiol (E2) levels following ovarian stimulation by FSH/HMG. Many genes are involved in oocyte maturation, and demographic features and lifestyle can affect the oocyte maturity and developmental competence. The present study was conducted to investigate the magnitude of gene expression and lifestyle habits in POR women as compared to healthy women, using different statistical and computational methods.

Methods

Fifty women in the two groups were studied. The study groups included POR women (n = 25) with 1–9 released oocytes, and the control group (normal women, n = 25) with 9–15 released oocytes. Quantitative PCR was used to estimate the expression of FIGLA, ZAR1, WNT4, LHX8, APC, H1FOO, MOS, and DMC1 genes in granulosa cells.

Results

The results showed no significant difference in the magnitude of the studied genes’ expression and linear discriminant analysis did not differentiate the studied groups based on all the genes together. Redundancy analysis (RDA) and latent factor mixed model (LFMM) results produce no significant association between the genes’ expression magnitude and the geographical variables of the patients’ local habitat. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of the demographic features differentiated the two groups of women.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that demographic features may have an effect on sample gene expression levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The current study is not publicly available due to personal document confidentiality. Data are available from the corresponding author on request.

Abbreviations

POR:

Poor response to ovarian stimulation

OS:

Ovarian stimulation

ART:

Assisted reproductive technology

ICSI:

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection

AMH:

Anti-mullerian hormone

AFC:

Antral follicle count

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

References

  1. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, et al. ESHRE consensus on the definition of “poor response” to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nagels HE, Rishworth JR, Siristatidis CS, Kroon B. Androgens (dehydroepiandrosterone or testosterone) for women undergoing assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009749.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pandian Z, McTavish AR, Aucott L, Hamilton MP, Bhattacharya S. Interventions for ‘poor responders’ to controlled ovarian hyper stimulation (COH) in in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004379.pub3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Patrizio P, Vaiarelli A, Levi Setti PE, et al. How to define, diagnose and treat poor responders? Responses from a worldwide survey of IVF clinics. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.03.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Humaidan P, Alviggi C, Fischer R, Esteves SC. The novel POSEIDON stratification of ‘Low prognosis patients in Assisted Reproductive Technology’ and its proposed marker of successful outcome. F1000Res. 2016. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10382.

  6. Rodrigues P, Limback D, McGinnis L, Marques M, Aibar J, Plancha CE. Germ-somatic cell interactions are involved in establishing the follicle reserve in mammals. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.674137.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sang Q, Zhou Z, Mu J, Wang L. Genetic factors as potential molecular markers of human oocyte and embryo quality. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(5):993–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02196-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fei CF, Zhou LQ. Gene mutations impede oocyte maturation, fertilization, and early embryonic development. BioEssays. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202200007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Havelock JC, Rainey WE, Carr BR. Ovarian granulosa cell lines. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2004.04.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Meczekalski B. Oocyte-specific genes: role in fertility and infertility. J Endocrinol Invest. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03346489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rong Y, Ji SY, Zhu YZ, Wu YW, Shen L, Fan HY. ZAR1 and ZAR2 are required for oocyte meiotic maturation by regulating the maternal transcriptome and mRNA translational activation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz863.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanaka M, Kihara M, Hennebold JD, et al. H1FOO is coupled to the initiation of oocytic growth. Biol Reprod. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.104.032474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ren Y, Suzuki H, Jagarlamudi K, et al. Lhx8 regulates primordial follicle activation and postnatal folliculogenesis. BMC Biol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-015-0151-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernard P, Harley VR. Wnt4 action in gonadal development and sex determination. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2006.06.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ayala-Calvillo E, Mojica-Vázquez LH, García-Carrancá A, González-Maya L. Wnt/β catenin pathway activation and silencing of the APC gene in HPV positive human cervical cancer derived cells. Mol Med Rep. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.7853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. He W-B, Tu C-F, Liu Q, et al. DMC1 mutation that causes human non-obstructive azoospermia and premature ovarian insufficiency identified by whole-exome sequencing. J Med Genet. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt A, Rauh NR, Nigg EA, Mayer TU. Cytostatic factor: an activity that puts the cell cycle on hold. J Cell Sci. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fu L, Zhang M, Mastrantoni K, Perfetto M, Wei S, Yao J. Bovine Lhx8, a germ cell-specific nuclear factor, interacts with FIGLA. PLoS One. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164671.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Maged AM, Fahmy RM, Rashwan H, et al. Effect of body mass index on the outcome of IVF cycles among patients with poor ovarian response. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aftabsavad S, Noormohammadi Z, Moini A, Karimipoor M. Effect of bisphenol A on alterations of ICAM-1 and HLA-G genes expression and DNA methylation profiles in cumulus cells of infertile women with poor response to ovarian stimulation. Sci Rep. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87175-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Safarinejad MR. Infertility among couples in a population-based study in Iran: prevalence and associated risk factors. Int J Androl. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2007.00764.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Badawy A, Wageah A, El Gharib M, Osman EE. Prediction and diagnosis of poor ovarian response: the dilemma. J Reprod Infertil. 2011;12(4):241–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Nazni P. Association of western diet & lifestyle with decreased fertility. Indian J Med Res. 2014;140 Suppl(Suppl 1):S78–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Agca C, Yakan A, Agca Y. Estrus synchronization and ovarian hyper-stimulation treatments have negligible effects on cumulus oocyte complex gene expression whereas induction of ovulation causes major expression changes. Mol Reprod Dev. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bragança GM, Batista RITP, Souza-Fabjan JMG, et al. Dose and administration protocol for FSH used for ovarian stimulation affects gene expression in sheep cumulus-oocyte complexes. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD17337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bogacki M, Wasielak M, Kitewska A, Bogacka I, Jalali BM. The effect of hormonal estrus induction on maternal effect and apoptosis-related genes expression in porcine cumulus-oocyte complexes. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bayne RA, Martins da Silva SJ, Anderson RA. Increased expression of the FIGLA transcription factor is associated with primordial follicle formation in the human fetal ovary. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gah056.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Z, Liu CY, Zhao Y, Dean J. FIGLA, LHX8, and SOHLH1 transcription factor networks regulate mouse oocyte growth and differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Shen C, Sheng Q, Zhang X, Fu Y, Zhu K. Hypermethylated APC in serous carcinoma based on a meta-analysis of ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-016-0271-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Snider AP, Wood JR. Obesity induces ovarian inflammation and reduces oocyte quality. Reproduction. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-18-0583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Silvestris E, de Pergola G, Rosania R, Loverro G. Obesity as disruptor of the female fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0336-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Vural F, Vural B, Çakıroğlu Y. The role of overweight and obesity in in vitro fertilization outcomes of poor ovarian responders. Biomed Res Int. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/781543.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Park JC, Kim SM, Rhee JH, Kim JI. Emotional stress and associated factors in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fert Steri Supplement (E261). 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.889

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients for their help. We also acknowledge the Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University for providing a laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZN and AM had conventionalization of the project, ZN and SA wrote the main manuscript test, ZN did data analyses, NB, AN and, ZA collected samples and performed laboratory work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahra Noormohammadi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The project proposal was reviewed by the Ethics Committee of the Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, and was approved with the ID number No. IR.IAU.SRB.REC.1400.296. Informed consent was obtained from individuals.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bahrami, N., Nazari, A., Afshari, Z. et al. Gene expression and demographic analyses in women with the poor ovarian response: a computational approach. J Assist Reprod Genet 40, 2627–2638 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02919-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02919-4

Keywords

Navigation