Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The importance of on-site genetic counseling for prospective assisted reproductive technology patients

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the value of having an onsite genetic counseling service integrated into an assisted reproductive technology (ART) center.

Methods

Since January 2021, we have offered genetic counseling at our ART center for couples whose medical history suggests risk of transmission of a genetic disorder. The percentage of couples referred for genetic counseling, the distribution of couples according to reasons for consultation, the mode of transmission in cases of Mendelian disorders, and the frequency of mutations for those with identified genetic disorders were determined.

Results

In an 18-month period, 150 of 1340 couples (11.2%) enrolled for ART treatment were referred to the genetic counseling unit. Two-thirds (99/150, 66.0%) were referred for a known genetic risk, a family history of a genetic disorder or chromosomal abnormality, a serious condition of unknown cause, or consanguinity. The remaining couples had a putative genetic risk (diminished ovarian reserve, high incidence of oocyte immaturity, recurrent abortion, or severe male infertility). Of the 99 with known genetic risk, 62 (62.7%), were approved for ART treatment, 23 (23.2%) were recommended prenatal or preimplantation testing, and 14 (14.1%) were referred for further testing before undergoing ART.

Conclusions

Our findings reveal great value in having an on-site genetic counseling unit for referral of ART patients. Such a unit makes the ART process smoother and safer for couples, and it lightens the burden of ART staff by removing responsibilities for which they are neither trained, nor should they have to assume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Law No. 94–654 of July 29, 1994 relating to the donation and use of elements and products of the human body, medically assisted procreation and prenatal diagnosis. https://www.legifrance-gouv-fr.

  2. Nance MA. Genetic counseling and testing for Huntington’s disease: a historical review. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2017;174(1):75–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perera CN, O’Sullivan S, Pachter N, Tan JJ, Cohen PA. Patient satisfaction with private genetic counselling for familial cancer in Western Australia: a prospective audit. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021;22(10):3253–9. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.10.3253.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Elliott AM. Genetic counseling and genome sequencing in pediatric rare disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020;10(3):a036632. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a036632.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lilienthal D, Cahr M. Genetic counseling and assisted reproductive technologies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020;10(11):a036566. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a036566.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Yarnall RS, Elango S, Manoharan A, Rodriguez SA, Bristow SL, Kumar N, Niknazar M, Hoffman D, Ghadir S, Vassena R, Chen SH, Hershlag A, Grifo J, Puig O. Evaluating genetic ancestry and self-reported ethnicity in the context of carrier screening. BMC Genet. 2017;18(1):99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-017-0570-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. De Rycke M, Berckmoes V. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(8):871. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11080871.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bunnell ME, Dobson LJ, Lanes A, Ginsburg ES. Use of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders and subsequent prenatal care and diagnostic testing. Prenat Diagn. 2022;42(8):1022–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sciorio R, Tramontano L, Catt J. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): status and future challenges. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020;36(1):6–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2019.1641194.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee Opinion. minimum standards for practices offering assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 2021;115:578–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion: carrier screening for genetic conditions. Committee Opinion No. 691. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(3):e41–e55. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001952.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Foch Hospital, 40 Rue Worth, 92151, Suresnes, France

    Achraf Benammar, Arnold Munnich, Marine Poulain, Fanny Magnan, Catherine Racowsky & Jean-Marc Ayoubi

  2. INSERM, Paris, Île-de-France, France

    Arnold Munnich

  3. Université Paris-Saclay, University of Versailles, INRAE, ENVA, Jouy-en-Josas, BREED, France

    Marine Poulain & Jean-Marc Ayoubi

Authors
  1. Achraf Benammar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arnold Munnich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marine Poulain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fanny Magnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Catherine Racowsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jean-Marc Ayoubi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Achraf Benammar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benammar, A., Munnich, A., Poulain, M. et al. The importance of on-site genetic counseling for prospective assisted reproductive technology patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 40, 1341–1347 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02802-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02802-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation