Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of self-compassion-based programs for infertility (SCPI) on anxiety and depression among women pursuing fertility treatment: a three-armed, randomised controlled trial

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the effects of self-compassion training using videos (SCV) versus self-compassion training using digital stories (SC-DS) as compared to a control group (CG) on reducing anxiety and depression symptoms among women pursuing fertility treatment.

Methods

A three-armed, randomised controlled trial randomly assigned 200 eligible women to SCV(n = 65), SC-DS (n = 67), and CG (n = 68). All three randomised groups completed questionnaires immediately after randomisation (T1), after completing the interventions (T2), and 10 weeks after the interventions (T3). A generalised estimation equation was used with the intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcomes were anxiety and depression, and secondary outcomes were self-compassion, infertility self-efficacy, and pregnancy rates.

Results

SCV and SC-DS participants experienced a significant reduction in anxiety and depression from T1 to T2 and from T1 to T3 (p < 0.001; d > 0.8). SCV and SC-DS participants experienced a significant increase in self-compassion and infertility self-efficacy from T1 to T2 and from T1 to T3 (p < 0.001; d > 0.8). SC-DS seemed to be superior to SCV and CG. No significant differences were found among the three groups in pregnancy rates. SCV and SC-DS participants rated self-compassion training programs positively and said they would highly recommend them to others.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that SCV and SC-DS were effective in reducing anxiety and depression and increasing self-compassion and infertility self-efficacy. Online flexible self-compassion interventions could make psychological support more accessible for women undergoing fertility treatment in resource-poor settings.

Trial registration

(ChiCTR2100046065) [12/04/2021].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Vander Borght M, Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem. 2018;62:2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cousineau TM, Domar AD. Psychological impact of infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21(2):293–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pasch LA, Holley SR, Bleil ME, Shehab D, Katz PP, Adler NE. Addressing the needs of fertility treatment patients and their partners: are they informed of and do they receive mental health services? Fertil Steril. 2016;106(1):209-215.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clifton J, Parent J, Seehuus M, Worrall G, Forehand R, Domar A. An internet-based mind/body intervention to mitigate distress in women experiencing infertility: a randomized pilot trial. Matsuoka YJ, editor. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0229379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kjaer TK, Jensen A, Dalton SO, Johansen C, Schmiedel S, Küjaer SK. Suicide in Danish women evaluated for fertility problems. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(9):2401–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Domar AD, Rooney K, Hacker MR, Sakkas D, Dodge LE. Burden of care is the primary reason why insured women terminate in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(6):1121–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Malina A, Pooley JA. Psychological consequences of ivf fertilization—review of research. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017;24(4):554–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Galhardo A, Cunha M, Pinto-Gouveia J, Matos M. The mediator role of emotion regulation processes on infertility-related stress. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2013;20(4):497–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Raque-Bogdan TL, Hoffman MA. The relationship among infertility, self-compassion, and well-being for women with primary or secondary infertility. Psychol Women Q. 2015;39(4):484–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim WS, Langer S, Todd M, et al. Feasibility of a Digital Storytelling Intervention for Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients. J Cancer Educ. 2022;37(5):1275–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01948-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Afshani SA, Abooei A, Fahadan AMA. Self-compassion training and psychological well-being of infertile female. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2019;17(10):757–62.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neff K. Self-compassion: an alternative conceptualization of a healthyattitudetoward oneself. Self Identity. 2003;2:85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang S, Zhan H. Enhancing teaching and learning with digital storytelling. Int J Inf Commun Technol Educ. 2010;6(2):76–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Laing CM, Moules NJ, Estefan A, Lang M. “Stories take your role away from you”: understanding the impact on health care professionals of viewing digital stories of pediatric and adolescent/young adult oncology patients. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2017;34(4):261–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. D’Cruz K, Douglas J, Serry T. Narrative storytelling as both an advocacy tool and a therapeutic process: perspectives of adult storytellers with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020;30(8):1409–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Laing CM, Moules NJ, Sinclair S, Estefan A. Digital storytelling as a psychosocial tool for adult cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019;46(2):147–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Boivin J, Scanlan LC, Walker SM. Why are infertile patients not using psychosocial counselling? Hum Reprod. 1999;14(5):1384–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meyers AJ, Domar AD. Research-supported mobile applications and internet-based technologies to mediate the psychological effects of infertility: a review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;42(3):679–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Dongen AJCM, Nelen WLDM, Inthout J, Kremer JAM, Verhaak CM. e-Therapy to reduce emotional distress in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART): a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(5):1046–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haemmerli K, Znoj H, Berger T. Internet-based support for infertile patients: a randomized controlled study. J Behav Med. 2010;33(2):135–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Folkman S. Stress: Appraisal and coping. In: Gellman MD, Turner JR, editors. Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. New York, NY: Springer; 2013. p. 1913–1915. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215

  22. Zurlo MC, Cattaneo Della Volta MF, Vallone F. Infertility-related stress and psychological health outcomes in infertile couples undergoing medical treatments: testing a multi-dimensional model. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2020;27(4):662–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Swanson A, Braverman AM. Psychological components of infertility. Fam Court Rev. 2021;59(1):67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Terry DJ, Hynes GJ. Adjustment to a low-control situation: reexamining the role of coping responses. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(4):1078–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gross JJ. Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(1):224–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Galhardo A, Pinto-Gouveia J, Cunha M, Matos M. The impact of shame and self-judgment on psychopathology in infertile patients. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(9):2408–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cwikel J, Gidron Y, Sheiner E. Psychological interactions with infertility among women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;117(2):126–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.05.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lang M, Laing C, Moules N, Estefan A. Words, Camera, Music, Action: A Methodology of digital storytelling in a health care setting. Int J Qual Methods. 2019;18:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Neff KD, Germer CK. A pilot study and randomized controlled trial of the mindful self-compassion program. J Clin Psychol. 2013;69(1):28–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Mitchie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337(7676):979–83.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dunstan DA, Scott N. Norms for Zung’s Self-rating Anxiety Scale. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics. 1971;12(6):371–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182(71)71479-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zung WWK. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965;12:63–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dunstan DA, Scott N. Clarification of the cut-off score for Zung’s self-rating depression scale. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Neff KD. The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. J Couns Psychol. 2003;2:85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cousineau TM, Green TC, Corsini EA, Barnard T, Seibring AR, Domar AD, et al. Development and validation of the Infertility Self-Efficacy scale. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(6):1684–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Arslan-Özkan İ, Okumuş H, Lash AA, Firat MZ. Cultural Validation of the Turkish Version of the Infertility Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (TISE-SF). J TranscultNurs. 2014;25(3):232–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659613508784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Frederiksen Y, Farver-Vestergaard I, Skovgård NG, Ingerslev HJ, Zachariae R. Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for psychological and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2015;5(1):e006592. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006592

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Vol. 2, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. New York; 1977. 1–41 p.

  42. Finlay-Jones A, Kane R, Rees C. Self-compassion online: a pilot study of an internet-based self-compassion cultivation program for psychology trainees. J Clin Psychol. 2017;73(7):797–816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Galhardo A, Cunha M, Pinto-Gouveia J. Mindfulness-based program for infertility: efficacy study. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(4):1059–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Neff KD, Germer C. Self-compassion and psychological well-being. In: Seppälä EM, Simon-Thomas E, Brown SL, Worline MC, Cameron CD, Doty JR, editors. The Oxford handbook of compassion science. Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 371–85.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gilbert P. Training our minds in, with and for compassion: An introduction to concepts and compassion-focused exercises. Interactions; 2010. p.1–82. https://www.getselfhelp.co.uk/docs/Gilbert-compassion-handout.pdf

  46. Smeets E, Neff K, Alberts H, Peters M. Meeting suffering with kindness: effects of a brief self-compassion intervention for female college students. J Clin Psychol. 2014;70(9):794–807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ferrari M, Hunt C, Harrysunker A, Abbott MJ, Beath AP, Einstein DA. Self-compassion interventions and psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis of RCTs. Mindfulness (N Y). 2019;10(8):1455–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pasha H, Faramarzi M, Esmailzadeh S, Kheirkhah F, Salmalian H. Comparison of pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment strategies in promotion of infertility self-efficacy scale in infertile women: a randomized controlled trial. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013;11(6):495–502.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Cousineau TM, Green TC, Corsini E, Seibring A, Showstack MT, Applegarth L, et al. Online psychoeducational support for infertile women : a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(3):554–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bai CF, Cui NX, Xu X, Mi GL, Sun JW, Shao D, et al. Effectiveness of two guided self-administered interventions for psychological distress among women with infertility: a three-armed, randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(7):1235–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Matthiesen S, Klonoff-Cohen H, Zachariae R, Jensen-Johansen MB, Nielsen BK, Frederiksen Y, et al. The effect of an expressive writing intervention (EWI) on stress in infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment: a randomized controlled pilot study. Br J Health Psychol. 2012;17(2):362–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ockhuijsen H, Van Den Hoogen A, Eijkemans M, Macklon N, Boivin J. The impact of a self-administered coping intervention on emotional well-being in women awaiting the outcome of IVF treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(7):1459–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Boivin J. A review of psychosocial interventions in infertility. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(12):2325–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00138-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Domar AD, Rooney KL, Wiegand B, Orav EJ, Alper MM, Berger BM, et al. Impact of a group mind/body intervention on pregnancy rates in IVF patients. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2269–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhou R, Cao YM, Liu D, Xiao JS. Pregnancy or psychological outcomes of psychotherapy interventions for infertility: a meta-analysis. Front Psychol. 2021;12(March):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sormunen T, Karlgren K, Aanesen A, Fossum B, Westerbotn M. The role of social media for persons affected by infertility. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Perone HR, Herweck AM, Stump HM, Levine HM, Wong AJ, Carugno J. The virtual infertility community: a qualitative analysis of patient experiences shared on Instagram. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(3):613–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Sexton MB, Byrd MR, O’Donohue WT, Jacobs NN. Web-based treatment for infertility-related psychological distress. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2010;13(4):347–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-009-0142-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the women who participated in this study. We also want to thank the three hospitals’ obstetrics and gynaecology outpatient clinics’ medical staff for their cooperation and support.

Funding

The first author provided funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AN, FK, and YL designed and conceptualised the study. JN, EB, AM, and FK assessed, collected, and conducted data analysis. AN, JN, EB, and FK drafted the manuscript, and LY and AM supervised the research process. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Luo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Njogu, A., Kaburu, F., Njogu, J. et al. The effect of self-compassion-based programs for infertility (SCPI) on anxiety and depression among women pursuing fertility treatment: a three-armed, randomised controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet 40, 911–927 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02771-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02771-6

Keywords

Navigation