Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosomal segregation analysis and HOST-based sperm selection in a complex reciprocal translocation carrier

  • Genetics
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) involve two or more chromosomes and at least three breakpoints. Due to their complexity, they are associated with a high number of unbalanced gametes, whose fertilization is often incompatible with viable fetal development. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is usually offered to those patients and typically shows modest results considering the high number of unbalanced embryos. We previously showed that a sperm selection process using the hypo-osmotic swelling test (HOST) allows for an 83% reduction in the proportion of unbalanced spermatozoa (US) in male rearrangements carriers. This is the first report of the use of this procedure in a CCR carrier.

Case description

We report on the case of a 36-year-old male t(4;7;14)(q12;p21;q11.2) carrier who presented to our center for infertility. Sperm fluorescent in situ hybridization showed an 88% proportion of unbalanced spermatozoa. After hypo-osmotic incubation and selection of spermatozoa with a specific flagellar conformation, the proportion of unbalanced spermatozoa dropped to 15%.

Discussion

In the present case, we show that it is possible to select chromosomally balanced prior to in vitro fertilization in male CCR carriers. This technique has the potential of increasing the proportion of euploid embryos and therefore the chances of healthy pregnancy and birth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, Alexandre ROUEN.

References

  1. Gardner RJMK, Sutherland GR, Shaffer LG. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. Oxford University Press, USA; 2011.

  2. Patsalis PC. Complex chromosomal rearrangements. Genet Couns. 2007;18:57–69.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Madan K. Balanced complex chromosome rearrangements: reproductive aspects. A review. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A:947–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu L, Wei Y, Luo K, Xie P, Gong F, Xiong B, et al. Clinical outcomes in carriers of complex chromosomal rearrangements: a retrospective analysis of comprehensive chromosome screening results in seven cases. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:486–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pellestor F, Anahory T, Lefort G, Puechberty J, Liehr T, Hédon B, et al. Complex chromosomal rearrangements: origin and meiotic behavior. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:476–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rouen A, Carlier L, Heide S, Egloff M, Marzin P, Ader F, et al. Potential selection of genetically balanced spermatozoa based on the hypo-osmotic swelling test in chromosomal rearrangement carriers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35:372–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pierron L, Irrmann A, de Chalus A, Bloch A, Heide S, Rogers E, et al. Double chromosomal translocation in an infertile man: one-step FISH meiotic segregation analysis and reproductive prognosis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:973–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Olszewska M, Stokowy T, Pollock N, Huleyuk N, Georgiadis A, Yatsenko S, et al. Familial infertility (azoospermia and cryptozoospermia) in two brothers-carriers of t(1;7) complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR): molecular cytogenetic analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:E4559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Salahshourifar I, Shahrokhshahi N, Tavakolzadeh T, Beheshti Z, Gourabi H. Complex chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosomes 1, 4 and 22 in an infertile male: case report and literature review. J Appl Genet. 2009;50:69–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cretu Stancu M, van Roosmalen MJ, Renkens I, Nieboer MM, Middelkamp S, de Ligt J, et al. Mapping and phasing of structural variation in patient genomes using nanopore sequencing. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fukami M, Shima H, Suzuki E, Ogata T, Matsubara K, Kamimaki T. Catastrophic cellular events leading to complex chromosomal rearrangements in the germline. Clin Genet. 2017;91:653–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cifuentes P, Navarro J, Míguez L, Egozcue J, Benet J. Sperm segregation analysis of a complex chromosome rearrangement, 2;22;11, by whole chromosome painting. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1998;82:204–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Loup V, Bernicot I, Janssens P, Hedon B, Hamamah S, Pellestor F, et al. Combined FISH and PRINS sperm analysis of complex chromosome rearrangement t(1;19;13): an approach facilitating PGD. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:111–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rouen A, Balet R, Dorna M, Hyon C, Pollet-Villard X, Chantot-Bastaraud S, et al. Discontinuous gradient centrifugation (DGC) decreases the proportion of chromosomally unbalanced spermatozoa in chromosomal rearrangement carriers. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2003–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeyendran RS, Van der Ven HH, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo BG, Zaneveld LJ. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fertil. 1984;70:219–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Boitrelle F, Shah R, Saleh R, Henkel R, Kandil H, Chung E, et al. The sixth edition of the WHO manual for human semen analysis: a critical review and SWOT analysis. Life (Basel). 2021;11:1368.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. F B, M T, Ah S, S M, Mh N-E. Is there an association between HOST grades and sperm quality? Human reproduction (Oxford, England) [Internet]. Hum Reprod. 2012 [cited 2022 Jul 6];27. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22595979/

  18. Stanger JD, Vo L, Yovich JL, Almahbobi G. Hypo-osmotic swelling test identifies individual spermatozoa with minimal DNA fragmentation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:474–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bloch A, Rogers EJ, Nicolas C, Martin-Denavit T, Monteiro M, Thomas D, et al. Detailed cell-level analysis of sperm nuclear quality among the different hypo-osmotic swelling test (HOST) classes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:2491–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Charehjooy N, Najafi MH, Tavalaee M, Deemeh MR, Azadi L, Shiravi AH, et al. Selection of sperm based on hypo-osmotic swelling may improve ICSI outcome: a preliminary prospective clinical trial. Int J Fertil Steril. 2014;8:21–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pang M-G, You Y-A, Park Y-J, Oh S-A, Kim D-S, Kim Y-J. Numerical chromosome abnormalities are associated with sperm tail swelling patterns. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1012–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mebrek ML, Clède S, de Chalus A, Heide S, Ruoso L, Rogers E, et al. Simple FISH-based evaluation of spermatic nuclear architecture shows an abnormal chromosomal organization in balanced chromosomal rearrangement carriers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37:803–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rouen A, Lavillaureix A, Hyon C, Heide S, Clède S, Balet R, et al. Nuclear volume differences between balanced and unbalanced spermatozoa in chromosomal translocation carriers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30:290–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Frumkin T, Peleg S, Gold V, Reches A, Asaf S, Azem F, et al. Complex chromosomal rearrangement-a lesson learned from PGS. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34:1095–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre Rouen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rossi, C., Siffroi, JP., Ruosso, L. et al. Chromosomal segregation analysis and HOST-based sperm selection in a complex reciprocal translocation carrier. J Assist Reprod Genet 40, 33–40 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02665-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02665-z

Keywords

Navigation