This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Salama M, Lambertini M, Christianson MS, et al. Installing oncofertility programs for breast cancer in limited versus optimum resource settings: empirical data from 39 surveyed centers in Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02394-3.
Ruddy KJ, Gelber SI, Tamimi RM, et al. Prospective study of fertility concerns and preservation strategies in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(11):1151–6. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.52.8877.
Oktay K, Harvey BE, Partridge AH, et al. Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(19):1994–2001. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.1914.
Lambertini M, Peccatori FA, Demeestere I, et al. Fertility preservation and post-treatment pregnancies in post-pubertal cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(12):1664–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.006.
Jones G, Hughes J, Mahmoodi N, Smith E, Skull J, Ledger W. What factors hinder the decision-making process for women with cancer and contemplating fertility preservation treatment? Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(4):433–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmx009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bedoschi, G., Navarro, P.A. Oncofertility programs still suffer from insufficient resources in limited settings. J Assist Reprod Genet 39, 953–955 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02452-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02452-w