Abstract
Purpose
To provide the clinicians with the most comprehensive medical information about sperm acquisition peri/postmortem.
Methods
The review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched up to January 2021. All studies reporting post or perimortem harvesting of sperm with any indication of an outcome, recognition and viability of sperm, and its utilization and treatment outcome were included. Studies that recorded cases but discussed only the ethical or legal issues without any information about the medical details were excluded.
Results
Twenty-four studies were included in this review. One hundred forty-eight cases were described; in 113 of them, sperm was retrieved. A variety of techniques for sperm acquisition were used. The data collected are limited and comparing the efficacy of the different approaches is not feasible. The longest time interval described between the death and viable sperm acquisition was 3 days. The sperm quality varies between the studies. One hundred thirty-six mature oocytes were injected with the retrieved sperm; the fertilization rate was 41%. Transfer cycles of 25 embryos and 8 live births are reported in the medical literature.
Conclusion
The overall low quality and high heterogeneity of the available data impair the ability to draw definitive conclusions. However, it can be stated that sperm acquisition up to at least 3 days postmortem can result in the live birth of healthy offspring. Further studies are needed to clarify the medical questions regarding the best techniques, success rates, and wellbeing of the parties involved.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Clarke GN. A.R.T. and history, 1678–1978. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1645–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del067.
Kerr S, Kerr S. Post-mortem sperm procurement : is it legal ? 1999;3.
Rothman CM. A method for obtaining viable sperm in the postmortem state. Fertil Steril. 1980. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45147-2.
Rothman CM. Live sperm, dead bodies. J Androl. 1999;20:456–7.
Batzer FR, Hurwitz JM, Caplan A. Postmortem parenthood and the need for a protocol with posthumous sperm procurement. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1263–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00384-4.
Winston R. Widow’s fight for husband’s sperm. Bmj. 1996;313:1477. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1477.
Katz KD. Parenthood from the grave: protocols for retrieving and utilizing gametes from the dead or dying. SSRN Electron J 2012;2006. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1639045.
A birth spurs debate on using sperm after death - The New York Times n.d. https://www.nytimes.com/1999/03/27/us/a-birth-spurs-debate-on-using-sperm-after-death.html (accessed December 30, 2019).
First live birth from dead man’s sperm - BioNews n.d. https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_87803 (accessed December 30, 2019).
Swinn M, Emberton M, Ralph D, Smith M, Serhal P, Bewley S, et al. Retrieving semen from a dead patient. BMJ. 1998;317:1583. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7172.1583.
Belker AM, Swanson ML, Cook CL, Carrillo AJ, Yoffe SC. Live birth after sperm retrieval from a moribund man. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:841–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02013-1.
Ohl DA, Park J, Cohen C, Goodman K, Menge AC. Procreation after death or mental incompetence: medical advance or technology gone awry? Fertil Steril. 1996;66:889–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58680-4.
Raziel A, Friedler S, Strassburger D, Kaufman S, Umansky A, Ron-El R. Using sperm posthumously: national guidelines versus practice. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1154–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.035.
Tumram NK, Bardale RV, Ambade VN. Sperm motility and viability extracted from penile tract of corpses: a preliminary study. Med Leg J. 2016;84:132–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025817216633358.
Shefi S, Raviv G, Eisenberg ML, Weissenberg R, Jalalian L, Levron J, et al. Posthumous sperm retrieval: analysis of time interval to harvest sperm. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2890–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del232.
Jequier AM, Zhang M. Practical problems in the posthumous retrieval of sperm. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2615–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu185.
Orr RD, Siegler M. Is posthumous semen retrieval ethically permissible? J Med Ethics. 2002;28:299–303. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.5.299.
Dostal J, Utrata R, Loyka S, Brezinova J, Svobodova M, Shenfield F. Post-mortem sperm retrieval in new European Union countries: case report. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2359–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei026.
Land S, Ross LS. Posthumous reproduction: current and future status. Urol Clin North Am. 2002;29:863–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(02)00082-4.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
Townsend MF, Richard JR, Witt MA. Artificially stimulated ejaculation in the brain-dead patient: a case report. Urology. 1996;47:760–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00021-0.
Brahams D. A unique case of frozen sperm export? Lancet. 1997;349:448. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)61180-4.
Kerr SM, Caplan A, Polin G, Smugar S, O’Neill K, Urowitz S. Postmortem sperm procurement. J Urol. 1997;157:2154–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64700-1.
Whitney S, Mian P. Life after death? Ethical questions raised after a request for postmortem sperm retrieval in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs. 1998;24:492–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1767(98)70034-0.
Summers-Chase D, Check JH, Choe J, Nazari A, Check M. Sperm extracted and cryopreserved from testes several hours after death results in pregnancy following frozen embryo transfer: case report. Arch Androl. 1999;43:235–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/014850199262553.
Check ML, Check JH, Summers-Chase D, Choe JK, Check DJ, Nazari A. Live birth after posthumous testicular sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection with cryopreserved sperm: case report. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2002.
Tash JA, Applegarth LD, Kerr SM, Fins JJ, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel PN. Postmortem sperm retrieval: the effect of instituting guidelines. J Urol. 2003;170:1922–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000092832.37190.94.
Fischbach RL, Loike JD. Postmortem fatherhood: life after life. Lancet. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60942-3.
Raziel A, Friedler S, Strassburger D, Kaufman S, Umansky A, Ron-El R. Nationwide use of postmortem retrieved sperm in Israel: a follow-up report. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2693–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.066.
Robson SJ, Campbell S, McDonald J, Tremellen K, Carlin E, Maybury G. Pregnancy and childhood health and developmental outcomes with the use of posthumous human sperm. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2259–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev191.
Filho EA, Fácio CL, Velani LA, Barbosa RN, Machado-Paula LA, Previato LF. Postmortem sperm retrieval for in vitro fertilization treatment: care to be taken-a Brazilian case report. J Bras Reprod Assist. 2014;18:85–7. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20140013.
Roscoe LA, Schenck DP. Case 5—is there life after death? A case of post-mortem sperm retrieval. Commun Bioeth End Life. 2017:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70920-8_5.
Zinkel A, Ankel F, Milbank A, Casey C, Sundheim J. Postmortem sperm retrieval in the emergency department: a case report and review of available guidelines. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2019;3:405–8. https://doi.org/10.5811/cpcem.2019.9.44472.
Tremellen K, Savulescu J. Posthumous conception by presumed consent. A pragmatic position for a rare but ethically challenging dilemma. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2016;3:26–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2016.11.001.
Ram-Tiktin E, Gilbar R, Fruchter RB, Ben-Ami I, Friedler S, Shalom-Paz E. Expanding the use of posthumous assisted reproduction technique: should the deceased’s parents be allowed to use his sperm? Clin Ethics. 2019;14:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477750918820648.
Gilbar R, Ram-Tiktin E. It takes a village to raise a child: solidarity in the courts-judicial justification for posthumous use of sperm by bereaved parents. Med Law Rev. 2020;28:317–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwz033.
Daar J, Benward J, Collins L, Davis J, Davis O, Francis L, et al. Posthumous retrieval and use of gametes or embryos: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:45–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.002.
Kroon B, Kroon F, Holt S, Wong B, Yazdani A. Post-mortem sperm retrieval in Australasia. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52:487–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01469.x.
Pennings G, de Wert G, Shenfield F, Cohen J, Devroey P, Tarlatzis B. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 11: posthumous assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:3050–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del287.
Richie C. Post-mortem sperm retrieval and posthumous grandparenthood in the United States and internationally. Glob Bioeth Enq J 2020;8:13. https://doi.org/10.38020/gbe.8.1.2020.13-22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ronit Beck Fruchter had the idea for the article; Ronit Beck Fruchter and Stav Oved Ovics performed the literature search and data analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ronit Beck Fruchter and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Ethical approval was not required as the study involved only the review of published research.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ovics, S.O., Baram, S., Nothman, S. et al. Perimortem and postmortem sperm acquisition: review of clinical data. J Assist Reprod Genet 39, 977–986 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02427-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02427-x