Abstract
Nucleolus precursor bodies (NPB) are aggregations of intrapronuclear material observed in the pronuclei of fertilized human eggs. They derive from and evolve into nucleoli of the growing oocyte and the early embryo, respectively. Decades-old observations suggest that the patterns of their distribution represent a morphological marker of embryo developmental competence. Recent time-lapse microscopy (TLM) data now indicate that the vectorial characteristics of NPB movement can predict blastocyst formation, euploidy, and implantation. Since distributions of NPB and chromatin coincide, chromatin rearrangement in preparation for the first mitotic cleavage is emerging as a crucial process of early development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Inoue T, Taguchi S, Uemura M, Tsujimoto Y, Miyazaki K, Yamashita Y. Migration speed of nucleolus precursor bodies in human male pronuclei: a novel parameter for predicting live birth. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02172.
Fulka H, Aoki F. Nucleolus precursor bodies and ribosome biogenesis in early mammalian embryos: old theories and new discoveries. Biol Reprod. 2016;94(6):143.
Kyogoku H, Kitajima TS, Miyano T. Nucleolus precursor body (NPB): a distinct structure in mammalian oocytes and zygotes. Nucleus. 2014;5(6):493–8.
Tesarik J, Greco E. The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(5):1318–23.
Salumets A, Hydén-Granskog C, Suikkari AM, Tiitinen A, Tuuri T. The predictive value of pronuclear morphology of zygotes in the assessment of human embryo quality. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(10):2177–81.
Scott L. Pronuclear scoring as a predictor of embryo development. Reprod BioMed Online. 2003;6(2):201–14.
Coskun S, Hellani A, Jaroudi K, Al-Mayman H, Al-Kabra M, Qeba M. Nucleolar precursor body distribution in pronuclei is correlated to chromosomal abnormalities in embryos. Reprod BioMed Online. 2003;7(1):86–90.
Coticchio G, Mignini Renzini M, Novara PV, Lain M, De Ponti E, Turchi D, et al. Focused time-lapse analysis reveals novel aspects of human fertilization and suggests new parameters of embryo viability. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(1):23–31.
Zhan Q, Ye Z, Clarke R, Rosenwaks Z, Zaninovic N. Direct unequal cleavages: embryo developmental competence, genetic constitution and clinical outcome. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0166398.
Lagalla C, Tarozzi N, Sciajno R, Wells D, Di Santo M, Nadalini M, et al. Embryos with morphokinetic abnormalities may develop into euploid blastocysts. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;34(2):137–46.
Coticchio G, Ezoe K, Lagalla C, Shimazaki K, Ohata K, Ninomiya M, et al. Perturbations of morphogenesis at the compaction stage affect blastocyst implantation and live birth rates. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(4):918–28.
Marcos J, Pérez-Albalá S, Mifsud A, Molla M, Landeras J, Meseguer M. Collapse of blastocysts is strongly related to lower implantation success: a time-lapse study. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(11):2501–8.
Cavazza T, Takeda Y, Politi AZ, Aushev M, Aldag P, Baker C, et al. Parental genome unification is highly error-prone in mammalian embryos. Cell. 2021;184:1–18.
Kahraman S, Kumtepe Y, Sertyel S, Dönmez E, Benkhalifa M, Findikli N, et al. Pronuclear morphology scoring and chromosomal status of embryos in severe male infertility. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(12):3193–200.
Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Lappi M, Borghi E, Ermini B. Oocyte euploidy, pronuclear zygote morphology and embryo chromosomal complement. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):241–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coticchio, G., Borini, A. & Albertini, D.F. The slippery slope antedating syngamy: pronuclear activity in preparation for the first cleavage. J Assist Reprod Genet 38, 1721–1723 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02238-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02238-6