References
Kawwass JF, Kulkarni AD, Hipp HS, Crawford S, Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ. Extremities of body mass index and their association with pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2016 Dec;106(7):1742–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.028.
Kim J, Patounakis G, Juneau C, Morin S, Neal S, Bergh P, et al. The Appraisal of Body Content (ABC) trial: increased male or female adiposity does not significantly impact in vitro fertilization laboratory or clinical outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2021;10:S0015-0282(21)00026-1.
Zheng D, Zeng L, Yang R, Lian Y, Zhu YM, Liang X, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) versus conventional in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in couples with non-severe male infertility (NSMI-ICSI): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):e030366. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030366.
Abbas AM, Hussein RS, Elsenity MA, Samaha II, El Etriby KA, Abd El-Ghany MF, et al. Higher clinical pregnancy rate with in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in treatment of non-male factor infertility: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020;49(6):101706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101706.
Funding
NOM is the recipient of the NHMRC Peter Doherty Early Career Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
KT and LPI declare that they are paid employees of Monash IVF Group Ltd.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tremellen, K., Vincent, A.D., Pacella-Ince, L. et al. Comparison of in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection on live birth rates in couples with non-male factor infertility and advanced maternal age: overlooked details—response from authors. J Assist Reprod Genet 38, 1889–1890 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02193-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02193-2