Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ageing and ovarian stimulation modulate the relative levels of transcript abundance of oocyte DNA repair genes during the germinal vesicle-metaphase II transition in mice

  • Reproductive Physiology and Disease
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Oocyte quality and reproductive outcome are negatively affected by advanced maternal age, ovarian stimulation and method of oocyte maturation during assisted reproduction; however, the mechanisms responsible for these associations are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of ageing, ovarian stimulation and in-vitro maturation on the relative levels of transcript abundance of genes associated with DNA repair during the transition of germinal vesicle (GV) to metaphase II (MII) stages of oocyte development.

Methods

The relative levels of transcript abundance of 90 DNA repair-associated genes was compared in GV-stage and MII-stage oocytes from unstimulated and hormone-stimulated ovaries from young (5–8-week-old) and old (42–45-week-old) C57BL6 mice. Ovarian stimulation was conducted using pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG) or anti-inhibin serum (AIS). DNA damage response was quantified by immunolabeling of the phosphorylated histone variant H2AX (γH2AX).

Results

The relative transcript abundance in DNA repair genes was significantly lower in MII oocytes compared to GV oocytes in young unstimulated and PMSG stimulated but was higher in AIS-stimulated mice. Interestingly, an increase in the relative level of transcript abundance of DNA repair genes was observed in MII oocytes from older mice in unstimulated, PMSG-stimulated and AIS-stimulated mice. Decreased γH2AX levels were found in both GV oocytes (82.9%) and MII oocytes (37.5%) during ageing in both ovarian stimulation types used (PMSG/AIS; p < 0.05).

Conclusions

In conclusion, DNA repair relative levels of transcript abundance are altered by maternal age and the method of ovarian stimulation during the GV-MII transition in oocytes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zheng P, Schramm RD, Latham KE. Developmental regulation and in vitro culture effects on expression of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint control genes in rhesus monkey oocytes and embryos. Biol Reprod. 2005;72(6):1359–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Russo G, Tosti E, El Mouatassim S, Benkhalifa M. Expression profile of genes coding for DNA repair in human oocytes using pangenomic microarrays, with a special focus on ROS linked decays. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24(11):513–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ménézo Y, Dale B, Cohen M. DNA damage and repair in human oocytes and embryos: a review. Zygote. 2010;18(4):357–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mehlmann LM. Stops and starts in mammalian oocytes: recent advances in understanding the regulation of meiotic arrest and oocyte maturation. Reproduction. 2005;130(6):791–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Titus S, Li F, Stobezki R, Akula K, Unsal E, Jeong K, et al. Impairment of BRCA1-related DNA double-strand break repair leads to ovarian aging in mice and humans. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(172):172ra21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Govindaraj V, Basavaraju RK, Rao AJ. Changes in the expression of DNA double strand break repair genes in primordial follicles from immature and aged rats. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;30(3):303–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tatone C, Amicarelli F, Carbone MC, Monteleone P, Caserta D, Marci R, et al. Cellular and molecular aspects of ovarian follicle ageing. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(2):131–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kerr JB, Brogan L, Myers M, Hutt KJ, Mladenovska T, Ricardo S, et al. The primordial follicle reserve is not renewed after chemical or γ-irradiation mediated depletion. Reproduction. 2012;143:469–76. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-11-0430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carroll J, Marangos P. The DNA damage response in mammalian oocytes. Front Genet. 2013;4:117.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Winship AL, Stringer JM, Liew SH, Hutt KJ. The importance of DNA repair for maintaining oocyte quality in response to anti-cancer treatments, environmental toxins and maternal ageing. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(2):119–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin JH, Aitken RJ, Bromfield EG, Nixon B. DNA damage and repair in the female germline: contributions to ART. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(2):180–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stringer JM, Winship A, Zerafa N, Wakefield M, Hutt K. Oocytes can efficiently repair DNA double-strand breaks to restore genetic integrity and protect offspring health. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117(21):11513–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De La Fuente R. Chromatin modifications in the germinal vesicle (GV) of mammalian oocytes. Dev Biol. 2006;292(1):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kocabas AM, Crosby J, Ross PJ, Otu HH, Beyhan Z, Can H, et al. The transcriptome of human oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103(38):14027–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jaroudi S, Kakourou G, Cawood S, Doshi A, Ranieri DM, Serhal P, et al. Expression profiling of DNA repair genes in human oocytes and blastocysts using microarrays. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(10):2649–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zeng F, Baldwin DA, Schultz RM. Transcript profiling during preimplantation mouse development. Dev Biol. 2004;272(2):483–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mjelle R, Hegre SA, Aas PA, Slupphaug G, Drabløs F, Sætrom P, et al. Cell cycle regulation of human DNA repair and chromatin remodeling genes. DNA Repair. 2015;30:53–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gasca S, Pellestor F, Assou S, Loup V, Anahory T, Dechaud H, et al. Identifying new human oocyte marker genes: a microarray approach. Reprod BioMed Online. 2007;14(2):175–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Su Y-Q, Sugiura K, Woo Y, Wigglesworth K, Kamdar S, Affourtit J, et al. Selective degradation of transcripts during meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes. Dev Biol. 2007;302(1):104–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pan H, Ma P, Zhu W, Schultz RM. Age-associated increase in aneuploidy and changes in gene expression in mouse eggs. Dev Biol. 2008;316(2):397–407.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Oktay K, Turan V, Titus S, Stobezki R, Liu L. BRCA mutations, DNA repair deficiency, and ovarian aging. Biol Reprod. 2015;93(3):67 1-10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Rzepka-Górska I, Tarnowski B, Chudecka-Głaz A, Górski B, Zielińska D, Tołoczko-Grabarek A. Premature menopause in patients with BRCA1 gene mutation. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;100(1):59–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Oktay K, Kim JY, Barad D, Babayev SN. Association of BRCA1 mutations with occult primary ovarian insufficiency: a possible explanation for the link between infertility and breast/ovarian cancer risks. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(2):240–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Paynton BV, Rempel R, Bachvarova R. Changes in state of adenylation and time course of degradation of maternal mRNAs during oocyte maturation and early embryonic development in the mouse. Dev Biol. 1988;129(2):304–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marangos P, Carroll J. Oocytes progress beyond prophase in the presence of DNA damage. Curr Biol. 2012;22(11):989–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yuen WS, Merriman JA, O'Bryan MK, Jones KT. DNA double strand breaks but not interstrand crosslinks prevent progress through meiosis in fully grown mouse oocytes. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43875.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ma J-Y, Ou-Yang Y-C, Wang Z-W, Wang Z, Jiang Z-Z, Luo S-M, et al. The effects of DNA double-strand breaks on mouse oocyte meiotic maturation. Cell Cycle. 2013;12(8):1233–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Marangos P, Stevense M, Niaka K, Lagoudaki M, Nabti I, Jessberger R, et al. DNA damage-induced metaphase I arrest is mediated by the spindle assembly checkpoint and maternal age. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8706.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Fauser BC, Devroey P. Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and luteal phase consequences. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003;14(5):236–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Collins JK, Jones KT. DNA damage responses in mammalian oocytes. Reproduction. 2016;152(1):R15–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W, Wood RD, editors. DNA repair and mutagenesis. American Society for Microbiology Press; 2005.

  32. Hasegawa A, Mochida K, Inoue H, Noda Y, Endo T, Watanabe G, et al. High-yield superovulation in adult mice by anti-inhibin serum treatment combined with estrous cycle synchronization. Biol Reprod. 2016;94(1):21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hernandez-Gonzalez I, Gonzalez-Robayna I, Shimada M, Wayne CM, Ochsner SA, White L, et al. Gene expression profiles of cumulus cell oocyte complexes during ovulation reveal cumulus cells express neuronal and immune-related genes: does this expand their role in the ovulation process? Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20(6):1300–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C T method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Metsalu T, Vilo J. ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using principal component analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(W1):W566–W70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Fauser B, Devroey P, Yen SS, Gosden R, Crowley W Jr, Baird DT, et al. Minimal ovarian stimulation for IVF: appraisal of potential benefits and drawbacks. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(11):2681–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sirard M-A, Richard F, Blondin P, Robert C. Contribution of the oocyte to embryo quality. Theriogenology. 2006;65(1):126–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ertzeid G, Storeng R. The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(2):221–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hoogenkamp H, Lewing P. Superovulation in mice in relation to their age. Vet Q. 1982;4(1):47–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Merriman JA, Jennings PC, McLaughlin EA, Jones KT. Effect of aging on superovulation efficiency, aneuploidy rates, and sister chromatid cohesion in mice aged up to 15 months. Biol Reprod. 2012;86(2):49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. van Rooij IA, Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, Habbema JDF, te Velde ER. Women older than 40 years of age and those with elevated follicle-stimulating hormone levels differ in poor response rate and embryo quality in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(3):482–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang H, Herath C, Xia G, Watanabe G, Taya K. Superovulation, fertilization and in vitro embryo development in mice after administration of an inhibin-neutralizing antiserum. Reproduction. 2001;122(5):809–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Assou S, Anahory T, Pantesco V, Le Carrour T, Pellestor F, Klein B, et al. The human cumulus–oocyte complex gene-expression profile. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(7):1705–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Hamatani T, Carter MG, Sharov AA, Ko MS. Dynamics of global gene expression changes during mouse preimplantation development. Dev Cell. 2004;6(1):117–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Horta F, Catt S, Ramachandran P, Vollenhoven B, Temple-Smith P. Female ageing affects the DNA repair capacity of oocytes in IVF using a controlled model of sperm DNA damage in mice. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:529–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. González-Marín C, Gosálvez J, Roy R. Types, causes, detection and repair of DNA fragmentation in animal and human sperm cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(11):14026–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Stringer JM, Winship A, Liew SH, Hutt K. The capacity of oocytes for DNA repair. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(15):2777–92.

  48. Govindaraj V, Krishnagiri H, Chauhan MS, Rao A. BRCA-1 gene expression and comparative proteomic profile of primordial follicles from young and adult buffalo (bubalus bubalis) ovaries. Anim Biotechnol. 2017;28(2):94–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yoon H-G, Yoon S-H, Son W-Y, Lee S-W, Park S-P, Im K-S, et al. Clinical assisted reproduction: pregnancies resulting from in vitro matured oocytes collected from women with regular menstrual cycle. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001;18(6):325–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Cha KY, Chung HM, Lee DR, Kwon H, Chung MK, Park LS, et al. Obstetric outcome of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome treated by in vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(5):1461–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Fadini R, Dal Canto M, Renzini MM, Brambillasca F, Comi R, Fumagalli D, et al. Effect of different gonadotrophin priming on IVM of oocytes from women with normal ovaries: a prospective randomized study. Reprod BioMed Online. 2009;19(3):343–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wiser A, Son W-Y, Shalom-Paz E, Reinblatt SL, Tulandi T, Holzer H. How old is too old for in vitro maturation (IVM) treatment? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159(2):381–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang X, Catt S, Pangestu M, Temple-Smith P. Successful in vitro culture of pre-antral follicles derived from vitrified murine ovarian tissue: oocyte maturation, fertilization, and live births. Reproduction. 2011;141(2):183–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kerr JB, Hutt KJ, Michalak EM, Cook M, Vandenberg CJ, Liew SH, et al. DNA damage-induced primordial follicle oocyte apoptosis and loss of fertility require TAp63-mediated induction of Puma and Noxa. Mol Cell. 2012;48(3):343–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Kerr JB, Hutt KJ, Cook M, Speed TP, Strasser A, Findlay JK, et al. Cisplatin-induced primordial follicle oocyte killing and loss of fertility are not prevented by imatinib. Nat Med. 2012;18(8):1170–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Lin F, Ma X-S, Wang Z-B, Wang Z-W, Luo Y-B, Huang L, et al. Different fates of oocytes with DNA double-strand breaks in vitro and in vivo. Cell Cycle. 2014;13(17):2674–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Collins JK, Lane SI, Merriman JA, Jones KT. DNA damage induces a meiotic arrest in mouse oocytes mediated by the spindle assembly checkpoint. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8553.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Martin JH, Bromfield EG, Aitken RJ, Lord T, Nixon B. Double strand break DNA repair occurs via non-homologous end-joining in mouse MII oocytes. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):9685.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Burma S, Chen BP, Murphy M, Kurimasa A, Chen DJ. ATM phosphorylates histone H2AX in response to DNA double-strand breaks. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(45):42462–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Stracker TH, Petrini JH. The MRE11 complex: starting from the ends. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12(2):90–103.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Turinetto V, Giachino C. Multiple facets of histone variant H2AX: a DNA double-strand-break marker with several biological functions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(5):2489–98.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Pinto DMS, Flaus A. Structure and function of histone H2AX. In: Genome stability and human diseases. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. p. 55–78.

  63. Turan V, Oktay K. BRCA-related ATM-mediated DNA double-strand break repair and ovarian aging. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(1):43–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wang B, Matsuoka S, Carpenter PB, Elledge SJ. 53BP1, a mediator of the DNA damage checkpoint. Science. 2002;298(5597):1435–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Huber A, Bai P, De Murcia JM, De Murcia G. PARP-1, PARP-2 and ATM in the DNA damage response: functional synergy in mouse development. DNA Repair. 2004;3(8-9):1103–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Li J, Bonkowski MS, Moniot S, Zhang D, Hubbard BP, Ling AJ, et al. A conserved NAD+ binding pocket that regulates protein-protein interactions during aging. Science. 2017;355(6331):1312–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Sanchez T, Wang T, Pedro MV, Zhang M, Esencan E, Sakkas D, et al. Metabolic imaging with the use of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) accurately detects mitochondrial dysfunction in mouse oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(7):1387–97.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Bertoldo MJ, Listijono DR, Ho W-HJ, Riepsamen AH, Goss DM, Richani D, et al. NAD+ repletion rescues female fertility during reproductive aging. Cell Rep. 2020;30(6):1670–81.e7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Education Program in Reproduction and Development, EPRD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Clinical Science, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia

    Fabrizzio Horta, Aravind Ravichandran, Sally Catt, Beverley Vollenhoven & Peter Temple-Smith

  2. Monash IVF, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia

    Fabrizzio Horta & Beverley Vollenhoven

  3. Women’s and Newborn Program, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia

    Beverley Vollenhoven

Authors
  1. Fabrizzio Horta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aravind Ravichandran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sally Catt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Beverley Vollenhoven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter Temple-Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizzio Horta.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 29 kb).

ESM 2

(PDF 722 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horta, F., Ravichandran, A., Catt, S. et al. Ageing and ovarian stimulation modulate the relative levels of transcript abundance of oocyte DNA repair genes during the germinal vesicle-metaphase II transition in mice. J Assist Reprod Genet 38, 55–69 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01981-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01981-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation