Skip to main content

Impact on using cryopreservation of testicular or epididymal sperm upon intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in men with obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether there was a significant impact on using cryopreservation of testicular or epididymal sperm upon the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients with obstructive azoospermia (OA).

Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 retrospective studies in databases from January 1, 1995, to June 1, 2020.

Result

Twenty articles were included in this study. A total of 3602 (64.1%) of 5616 oocytes injected with fresh epididymal sperm were fertilized, compared with 2366 (61.2%) of 3862 oocytes injected with cryopreserved sperm (relative risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.90, 1.02), P > 0.05). A total of 303 (44.1%) of 687 ICSI cycles using fresh epididymal sperm resulted in a clinical pregnancy, compared with 150 (36.6%) of 410 ICSI cycles using cryopreserved epididymal sperm (RR 0.84, 95% CI (0.72, 0.97), P < 0.05). In the testis, a total of 2147 (68.7%) of 3125 oocytes injected with fresh sperm were fertilized, compared with 1623 (63.5%) of 2557 oocytes injected with cryopreserved sperm (RR 0.97, 95% CI (0.90, 1.06), P > 0.05). A total of 151 (47.8%) of 316 ICSI cycles using fresh testicular sperm resulted in a clinical pregnancy, compared with 113 (38.2%) of 296 ICSI cycles using cryopreserved sperm (RR 0.87, 95% CI (0.72, 1.05), P > 0.05).

Conclusions

In men with OA, there was a statistical lower clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) by using frozen epididymal sperm compared with fresh epididymal sperm, but showing no difference on fertilization rate (FR). Additionally, FR and CPR were not affected by whether the retrieved testicular sperm was frozen or fresh.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol. 1989;142(1):62–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38662-7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wosnitzer MS, Goldstein M. Obstructive azoospermia. Urol Clin N Am. 2014;41(1):83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2013.08.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sperm retrieval for obstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5 Suppl):S213-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.047.

  4. 4.

    The management of obstructive azoospermia: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(5):873-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.013.

  5. 5.

    Ohlander S, Hotaling J, Kirshenbaum E, Niederberger C, Eisenberg ML. Impact of fresh versus cryopreserved testicular sperm upon intracytoplasmic sperm injection pregnancy outcomes in men with azoospermia due to spermatogenic dysfunction: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):344–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Nicopoullos JD, Gilling-Smith C, Almeida PA, Ramsay JW. The results of 154 ICSI cycles using surgically retrieved sperm from azoospermic men. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(3):579–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh092.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wood S, Thomas K, Schnauffer K, Troup S, Kingsland C, Lewis-Jones I. Reproductive potential of fresh and cryopreserved epididymal and testicular spermatozoa in consecutive intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles in the same patients. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(6):1162–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03098-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Thompson-Cree ME, McClure N, Donnelly ET, Steele KE, Lewis SE. Effects of cryopreservation on testicular sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation and its relationship with assisted conception outcome following ICSI with testicular spermatozoa. Reprod BioMed Online. 2003;7(4):449–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61889-5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Yu Z, Wei Z, Yang J, Wang T, Jiang H, Li H, et al. Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome with fresh versus frozen-thawed testicular sperm in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(7):1247–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1206-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Nicopoullos JD, Gilling-Smith C, Almeida PA, Norman-Taylor J, Grace I, Ramsay JW. Use of surgical sperm retrieval in azoospermic men: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(3):691–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.02.116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Silber SJ, Van Steirteghem AC, Liu J, Nagy Z, Tournaye H, Devroey P. High fertilization and pregnancy rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with spermatozoa obtained from testicle biopsy. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(1):148–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/10.1.148.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cota GF, de Sousa MR, Fereguetti TO, Rabello A. Efficacy of anti-leishmania therapy in visceral leishmaniasis among HIV infected patients: a systematic review with indirect comparison. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(5):e2195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002195.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lewis S, Clarke M. Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the trees. BMJ. 2001;322(7300):1479–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7300.1479.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cayan S, Lee D, Conaghan J, Givens CA, Ryan IP, Schriock ED, et al. A comparison of ICSI outcomes with fresh and cryopreserved epididymal spermatozoa from the same couples. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(3):495–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.3.495.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kalsi J, Thum MY, Muneer A, Pryor J, Abdullah H, Minhas S. Analysis of the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection using fresh or frozen sperm. BJU Int. 2011;107(7):1124–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09545.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kovac JR, Lehmann KJ, Fischer MA. A single-center study examining the outcomes of percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration in the treatment of obstructive azoospermia. Urol Ann. 2014;6(1):41–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.127026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shibahara H, Hamada Y, Hasegawa A, Toji H, Shigeta M, Yoshimoto T, et al. Correlation between the motility of frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa and the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Int J Androl. 1999;22(5):324–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2605.1999.00187.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yu G, Liu Y, Zhang H, Wu K. Application of testicular spermatozoa cryopreservation in assisted reproduction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;142(3):354–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Oates RD, Lobel SM, Harris DH, Pang S, Burgess CM, Carson RS. Efficacy of intracytoplasmic sperm injection using intentionally cryopreserved epididymal spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(1):133–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019006.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sharma RK, Padron OF, Thomas AJ Jr, Agarwal A. Factors associated with the quality before freezing and after thawing of sperm obtained by microsurgical epididymal aspiration. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(4):626–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00274-4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Abdel Raheem A, Rushwan N, Garaffa G, Zacharakis E, Doshi A, Heath C, et al. Factors influencing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome in men with azoospermia. BJU Int. 2013;112(2):258–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11714.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Karacan M, Alwaeely F, Erkan S, Çebi Z, Berberoğlugil M, Batukan M, et al. Outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with fresh testicular spermatozoa obtained on the day of or the day before oocyte collection and with cryopreserved testicular sperm in patients with azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(4):975–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Javed A, Ramaiah MK, Talkad MS. ICSI using fresh and frozen PESA-TESA spermatozoa to examine assisted reproductive outcome retrospectively. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019;62(6):429–37. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2019.62.6.429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Park YS, Lee SH, Song SJ, Jun JH, Koong MK, Seo JT. Influence of motility on the outcome of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh vs. frozen testicular sperm from men with obstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(3):526–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00798-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wu B, Wong D, Lu S, Dickstein S, Silva M, Gelety TJ. Optimal use of fresh and frozen-thawed testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in azoospermic patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2005;22(11-12):389–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-7481-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Devroey P, Silber S, Nagy Z, Liu J, Tournaye H, Joris H, et al. Ongoing pregnancies and birth after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(4):903–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136058.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Nagy Z, Liu J, Cecile J, Silber S, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Using ejaculated, fresh, and frozen-thawed epididymal and testicular spermatozoa gives rise to comparable results after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1995;63(4):808–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57486-x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Silber SJ, Devroey P, Tournaye H, Van Steirteghem AC. Fertilizing capacity of epididymal and testicular sperm using intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Reprod Fertil Dev. 1995;7(2):281–92; discussion 92-3. https://doi.org/10.1071/rd9950281.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Friedler S, Raziel A, Soffer Y, Strassburger D, Komarovsky D, Ron-El R. The outcome of intracytoplasmic injection of fresh and cryopreserved epididymal spermatozoa from patients with obstructive azoospermia--a comparative study. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(7):1872–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.7.1872.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Palermo GD, Schlegel PN, Hariprashad JJ, Ergün B, Mielnik A, Zaninovic N, et al. Fertilization and pregnancy outcome with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for azoospermic men. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(3):741–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.3.741.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Tournaye H, Merdad T, Silber S, Joris H, Verheyen G, Devroey P, et al. No differences in outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh or with frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):90–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.1.90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Habermann H, Seo R, Cieslak J, Niederberger C, Prins GS, Ross L. In vitro fertilization outcomes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh or frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(5):955–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00416-7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Tournaye H, Dohle GR, Barratt CL. Fertility preservation in men with cancer. Lancet. 2014;384(9950):1295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60495-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Katz DJ, Kolon TF, Feldman DR, Mulhall JP. Fertility preservation strategies for male patients with cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2013;10(8):463–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Coutifaris C. "Freeze only"--an evolving standard in clinical in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):577–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe1606213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):523–33. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1513873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Mazur P. The role of intracellular freezing in the death of cells cooled at supraoptimal rates. Cryobiology. 1977;14(3):251–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(77)90175-4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Malo C, Elwing B, Soederstroem L, Lundeheim N, Morrell JM, Skidmore JA. Effect of different freezing rates and thawing temperatures on cryosurvival of dromedary camel spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2019;125:43–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.07.037.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Fernández-Santos MR, Martínez-Pastor F, García-Macías V, Esteso MC, Soler AJ, Paz P, et al. Sperm characteristics and DNA integrity of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) epididymal spermatozoa frozen in the presence of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants. J Androl. 2007;28(2):294–305. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.106.000935.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Agarwal A, Prabakaran SA, Said TM. Prevention of oxidative stress injury to sperm. J Androl. 2005;26(6):654–60. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.05016.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bilodeau JF, Chatterjee S, Sirard MA, Gagnon C. Levels of antioxidant defenses are decreased in bovine spermatozoa after a cycle of freezing and thawing. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000;55(3):282–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2795(200003)55:3<282::Aid-mrd6>3.0.Co;2-7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Yildiz C, Ottaviani P, Law N, Ayearst R, Liu L, McKerlie C. Effects of cryopreservation on sperm quality, nuclear DNA integrity, in vitro fertilization, and in vitro embryo development in the mouse. Reproduction. 2007;133(3):585–95. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep-06-0256.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Rezaei N, Mohammadi M, Mohammadi H, Khalatbari A, Zare Z. Acrosome and chromatin integrity, oxidative stress, and expression of apoptosis-related genes in cryopreserved mouse epididymal spermatozoa treated with L-Carnitine. Cryobiology. 2020;95:171–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.03.006.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ved S, Montag M, Schmutzler A, Prietl G, Haidl G, van der Ven H. Pregnancy following intracytoplasmic sperm injection of immotile spermatozoa selected by the hypo-osmotic swelling-test: a case report. Andrologia. 1997;29(5):241–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.1997.tb00477.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Rogers BJ, Parker RA. Relationship between the human sperm hypo-osmotic swelling test and sperm penetration assay. J Androl. 1991;12(2):152–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Stanger JD, Vo L, Yovich JL, Almahbobi G. Hypo-osmotic swelling test identifies individual spermatozoa with minimal DNA fragmentation. Reprod BioMed Online. 2010;21(4):474–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    van Wely M, Barbey N, Meissner A, Repping S, Silber SJ. Live birth rates after MESA or TESE in men with obstructive azoospermia: is there a difference? Hum Reprod. 2015;30(4):761–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.H.C., X.Y., and G.L.Z. made the literature search and data analysis. S.X.Z., L.X.Y., and D.C.H. made study design. L.H.C., X.Y., and G.Y. drew the figures and tables. L.G.H. and G.Y. made the revisions. All authors approved the final version of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yong Gao or Guihua Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Figure S1.

Funnel plots illustrating the meta-analysis of fertilization rate and clinical pregnancy rate on using epididymal or testis sperm in ICSI. a Funnel plot for fertility rate in epididymis. b Funnel plot for clinical pregnancy rate in epididymis. c Funnel plot for fertility rate in testis. d Funnel plot for clinical pregnancy rate in testis (JPG 1403 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, H., Xie, Y., Gao, L. et al. Impact on using cryopreservation of testicular or epididymal sperm upon intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in men with obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 37, 2643–2651 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01940-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cryopreservation
  • Epididymal spermatozoa
  • Intracytoplasmic sperm injection
  • Obstructive azoospermia
  • Testicular spermatozoa