Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reproductive outcomes with donor sperm in couples with severe male-factor infertility after intracytoplasmic sperm injection failures

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate reproductive outcomes of artificial insemination and IVF with donor sperm (AID or IVF-D) for male-factor couples with a history of unsuccessful ICSI attempt.

Methods

This retrospective cohort includes couples with severe male-factor infertility who failed ICSI treatment, and subsequently underwent semen donation treatment. We report the following outcomes: (1) live birth rates in AID and IVF-D treatment for couples with severe male infertility factors and prior ICSI failures; (2) paternal impact on embryo development of the same oocyte cohort; (3) prognostic factors in obtaining a live birth with donor semen.

Results

Of 92 women with failed ICSI cycles (26 with multiple attempts), 45 couples underwent AID treatment. Live birth rate per cycle of AID was 18.9%. Fifty-three patients underwent IVF-D including 6 couples who previously did not conceive with AID. Embryological outcomes including fertilization, viable cleavage embryos, and blastocyst formation rates were significantly lower in ICSI cycles with partner sperm compared with IVF-D (P < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis showed that female age and the severity of spermatogenetic disorder are prognostic factors in obtaining a live birth with donated sperm.

Conclusion

Couples with severe male infertility factor (azoospermia or extreme oligoasthenospermia) and a history of unsuccessful ICSI cycles benefit from treating with donor sperm. ICSI fertilization, embryo viability, and progression of the embryo to the blastocyst stage are significantly deteriorated by semen parameters. The prognostic factors identified may help couples plan their treatment and prepare for their parenthood journey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luke B. Pregnancy and birth outcomes in couples with infertility with and without assisted reproductive technology: with an emphasis on US population-based studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(3):270–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abhyankar N, Kathrins M, Niederberger C. Use of testicular versus ejaculated sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection among men with cryptozoospermia: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(6):1469–1475.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Palermo GD, Neri QV, Monahan D, Kocent J, Rosenwaks Z. Development and current applications of assisted fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:248–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Amin YM, Ramzi AM. The effect of sperm parameters on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1995;64(5):982–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartolacci A, Pagliardini L, Makieva S, Salonia A, Papaleo E, Viganò P. Abnormal sperm concentration and motility as well as advanced paternal age compromise early embryonic development but not pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective study of 1266 ICSI cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(10):1897–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Strassburger D, Friedler S, Raziel A, Schachter M, Kastertein E, Ron-et R. Very low sperm count affects the result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17(8):431–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mazzilli R, Cimadomo D, Vaiarelli A, Capalbo A, Dovere L, Alviggi E, et al. Effect of the male factor on the clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection combined with preimplantation aneuploidy testing: observational longitudinal cohort study of 1,219 consecutive cycles. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(6):961–972.e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rawe VY, Olmedo SB, Nodar FN, Doncel GD, Acosta AA, Vitullo AD. Cytoskeletal organization defects and abortive activation in human oocytes after IVF and ICSI failure. Mol Hum Reprod. 2000;6:510–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. De Brucker M, Haentjens P, Evenepoel J, Devroey P, Collins J, Tournaye H. Cumulative delivery rates in different age groups after artificial insemination with donor sperm. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1891–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Viloria T, Garrido N, Minaya F, Remohí J, Muñoz M, Meseguer M. Report of results obtained in 2,934 women using donor sperm: donor insemination versus in vitro fertilization according to indication. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(5):1134–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Achard V, Perrin J, Saias-Magnan J, Nozet A, Grillo JM, Paulmyer-Lacroix O. Optimisation des re´ sultats d’inse’minations intra-ute´ rines uniques avec sperme de donneur : bilan de quatre ans d’activite´. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2005;33:877–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. MacLeod J. Human male infertility. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1971;26:335–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cooper TG, Noonan E, Von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HW, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:231–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li M, Zhao W, Xue X, Zhang S, Shi W, Shi J. Three pro-nuclei (3PN) incidence factors and clinical outcomes: a retrospective study from the fresh embryo transfer of in vitro fertilization with donor sperm (IVF-D). Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(8):13997–4003.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Shi W, Zhang S, Zhao W, Xia X, Wang M, Wang H, et al. Factors related to clinical pregnancy after vitrified-warmed embryo transfer: a retrospective and multivariate logistic regression analysis of 2313 transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(7):1768–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li M, Ma C, Xue X, Zhao W, Zhang S, Shi J. Effect of normal sperm morphology rate (NSMR) on clinical outcomes and fertilization methods selection in the ultra-short-term GnRH-a protocol. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(2):120–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li M, Wang H, Ma C, Shi J. Transferring two grades I cleavage-stage embryo might not be a good protocol. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017;33(7):557–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gardner DK, Lane M. Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF? Hum Reprod Update. 1997;3:367–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shi W, Xue X, Zhang S, Zhao W, Liu S, Zhou H, et al. Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(6):1338–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharpe RM. Sperm counts and fertility in men: a rocky road ahead: Science & Society Series on sex and science. EMBO Rep. 2012;13:398–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller JE, Smith TT. The effect of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and semen parameters on blastocyst development in vitro. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(5):918–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Desai N, Gill P, Tadros NN, Goldberg JM, Sabanegh E, Falcone T. Azoospermia and embryo morphokinetics: testicular sperm-derived embryos exhibit delays in early cell cycle events and increased arrest prior to compaction.

  24. Braude P, Bolton V, Moore S. Human gene expression first occurs between the four-and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development. Nature. 1988;332:459–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Borges E Jr, Setti AS, Braga DP, Figueira RC, Iaconelli A, et al. Total motile sperm count has a superior predictive value over the WHO 2010 cut-off values for the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Andrology. 2016;4(5):880–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mercan R, Lanzendorf SE, Mayer J Jr, Nassar A, Muasher SJ, Oehninger S. The outcome of clinical pregnancies following intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not affected by semen quality. Andrologia. 1998;30(2):91–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Frapsauce C, Cornuau M, Splingart C, Barthelemy C, Royere D, Guerif F. Clinical outcome after insemination with donor sperm in patients with poor results in ICSI cycles. Andrologia. 2013;45(2):86–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gerkowicz SA, Crawford SB, Hipp HS, Boulet SL, Kissin DM, Kawwass JF. Assisted reproductive technology with donor sperm: national trends and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(4):421.e1–421.e10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hennebicq S, Blagosklonov O, Eustache F, Papaxanthos A, Drouineaud V, Guillemain C, et al. Donor sperm insemination after failed intra-couple intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2018;64(2):130–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith ADAC, Tilling K, Nelson SM, Lawlor DA. Live-birth rate associated with repeat in vitro fertilisation treatment cycles. JAMA. 2015;314(24):2654–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McLernon DJ, Steyerberg EW, Te Velde ER, Lee AJ, Bhattacharya S. Predicting the chances of a live birth after one or more complete cycles of in vitro fertilisation: population based study of linked cycle data from 113 873 women. BMJ. 2016;355:i5735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Benchaib M. Donor sperm insemination after failed intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2010;38(9):511–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gorrill MJ, Burry KA, Patton PE. Pregnancy outcomes using donor sperm insemination after failed in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles in couples with complex infertility disorders. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:936–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Saias-Magnan J, Mandelbaum J. Quelle place de l’IAD après échec de l’ICSI? Reproduction Humaine et Hormones. 2000;13:484–6.

    Google Scholar 

  35. van den Hoven L, Hendriks JC, Verbeet JG, Westphal JR, Wetzels AM. Status of sperm morphology assessment: an evaluation of methodology and clinical value. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(1):53–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Xi’an Jiaotong University, 73#, Houzaimen North Street, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China

    He Cai, Jianhua Sun, Bin Meng & Juanzi Shi

  2. Leuven Institute for Fertility & Embryology, Schipvaartstraat 4, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Stephan Gordts

Authors
  1. He Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephan Gordts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jianhua Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bin Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Juanzi Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juanzi Shi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 35 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 45 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 83 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, H., Gordts, S., Sun, J. et al. Reproductive outcomes with donor sperm in couples with severe male-factor infertility after intracytoplasmic sperm injection failures. J Assist Reprod Genet 37, 1883–1893 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01828-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01828-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation