Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosomal segregation in sperm of the Robertsonian translocation (21;22) carrier and its impact on IVF outcome

  • Genetics
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the variability of meiotic segregation patterns in sperm of Robertsonian translocation (RobT) carrier t(21;22) and present effect on reproductive outcome.

Methods

Infertile couple enrolled in IVF/ICSI program. Sperm chromosomal segregation analysis was done using FISH; preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploids (PGT-A) was performed by NGS.

Results

Patients had a low fertilization rate and a negative outcome after the first IVF/ICSI cycle, so they were advised to do chromosomal aberration analysis before their next attempt. The second IVF/ICSI procedure resulted in pregnancy, and two blastocysts were cryopreserved. The NIFTY test has shown low risk for all tested trisomies, sex chromosomes aneuploidis, and deletion syndromes, so a healthy female child was born. During pregnancy, karyotypisation results revealed that the male partner is a RobT carrier t(21;22). Sperm segregation analysis of chromosomes 21 and 22 has shown six types of sperm chromosome sets. The majority of sperm cells had a normal/balanced RobT form of a haploid set of chromosomes (68.5–76%) called an “alternate.” Sperm cells that had additional chromosome 21 or 22, or lack of chromosome 21 or 22, were present in 4–12%. PGT-A performed on two cryopreserved blastocysts revealed one embryo euploid and the other with the mosaic aneuploidy of chromosome 7 present in 50% of the cells.

Conclusion

Infertile couples with a RobT male carrier who have semen comprising of normal/alternate form in the majority have a good prognosis of IVF/ICSI outcome. PGT is recommended because of the possible occurrence of viable trisomic embryos and potential interchromosomal effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Therman E, Susman B, Denniston C. The nonrandom participation of human acrocentric chromosomes in Robertsonian translocations. Ann Hum Genet England. 1989;53:49–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao W-W, Wu M, Chen F, Jiang S, Su H, Liang J, et al. Robertsonian translocations: an overview of 872 Robertsonian translocations identified in a diagnostic laboratory in China. PLoS One United States. 2015;10:e0122647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mack H, Swisshelm K. Robertsonian translocations. Brenner’s Encycl Genet. 2nd Ed; 2013;301–5.

  4. Roux C, Tripogney C, Morel F, Joanne C, Fellmann F, Clavequin MC, et al. Segregation of chromosomes in sperm of Robertsonian translocation carriers. Cytogenet Genome Res Switzerland. 2005;111:291–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chantot-Bastaraud S, Ravel C, Siffroi JP. Underlying karyotype abnormalities in IVF/ICSI patients. Reprod Biomed Online Netherlands. 2008;16:514–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ogur G, Van Assche E, Vegetti W, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Bonduelle M, et al. Chromosomal segregation in spermatozoa of 14 Robertsonian translocation carriers. Mol Hum Reprod England. 2006;12:209–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lamotte A, Martinez G, Devillard F, Hograindleur J-P, Satre V, Coutton C, et al. Is sperm FISH analysis still useful for Robertsonian translocations? Meiotic analysis for 23 patients and review of the literature. Basic Clin Androl. 2018;28:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Douet-Guilbert N, Bris M-JL, Amice V, Marchetti C, Delobel B, Amice J, et al. Interchromosomal effect in sperm of males with translocations: report of 6 cases and review of the literature. Int J Androl. England. 2005;28:372–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferfouri F, Selva J, Boitrelle F, Gomes DM, Torre A, Albert M, et al. The chromosomal risk in sperm from heterozygous Robertsonian translocation carriers is related to the sperm count and the translocation type. Fertil Steril. United States. 2011;96:1337–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang B, Nie B, Tang D, Li R, Liu X, Song J, et al. Analysis of meiotic segregation patterns and interchromosomal effects in sperm from 13 Robertsonian translocations. Balkan J Med Genet. 2017;20:43–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. LeMaire-Adkins R, Radke K, Hunt PA. Lack of checkpoint control at the metaphase/anaphase transition: a mechanism of meiotic nondisjunction in mammalian females. J Cell Biol United States. 1997;139:1611–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pylyp LY, Zukin VD, Bilko NM. Chromosomal segregation in sperm of Robertsonian translocation carriers. J Assist Reprod Genet. Netherlands. 2013;30:1141–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Syme RM, Martin RH. Meiotic segregation of a 21;22 Robertsonian translocation. Hum Reprod England. 1992;7:825–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mennicke K, Diercks P, Schlieker H, Bals-Pratsch M, al Hasani S, Diedrich K, et al. Molecular cytogenetic diagnostics in sperm. Int J Androl England. 1997;20(Suppl 3):11–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pierron L, Irrmann A, de Chalus A, Bloch A, Heide S, Rogers E, et al. Double chromosomal translocation in an infertile man: one-step FISH meiotic segregation analysis and reproductive prognosis. J Assist Reprod Genet. Netherlands; 2019;36:973–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. WHO. Examination and processing of human semen. World Health Edition, F; 2010;286.

  17. Ko DS, Cho JW, Lee HS, Kim JY, Kang IS, Yang KM, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis outcomes and meiotic segregation analysis of robertsonian translocation carriers. Fertil Steril [Internet]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc.; 2013; 99(5):1369-76.

  18. Escudero T, Abdelhadi I, Sandalinas M, Munne S. Predictive value of sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on the outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for translocations. Fertil Steril United States. 2003;79(Suppl 3):1528–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Wells D. Embryos of robertsonian translocation carriers exhibit a mitotic interchromosomal effect that enhances genetic instability during early development. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1003025.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Findikli N, Gultomruk M, Boynukalin FK, Ogur C, Caferler J, Bahceci M. Possible impact of interchromosomal effect at the blastocyst stage in cases undergoing PGT-A for translocations. Reprod Biomed Online [Internet]. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019;38(1):e56–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tulay P, Gultomruk M, Findikli N, Yagmur E, Bahceci M. Is the interchromosomal effect present in embryos derived from Robertsonian and reciprocal translocation carriers particularly focusing on chromosome 10 rearrangements? Zygote England. 2015;23:908–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Xie Y, Xu Y, Wang J, Miao B, Zeng Y, Ding C, et al. Preliminary analysis of numerical chromosome abnormalities in reciprocal and Robertsonian translocation preimplantation genetic diagnosis cases with 24-chromosomal analysis with an aCGH/SNP microarray. J Assist Reprod Genet Netherlands. 2018;35:177–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanja Vujisic.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vujisic, S., Korac, P., Pavlica, M. et al. Chromosomal segregation in sperm of the Robertsonian translocation (21;22) carrier and its impact on IVF outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 37, 231–238 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01648-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01648-x

Keywords

Navigation