Correction to: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01563-1

The original article unfortunately contained 2 mistakes. 1) In the Result section of high responders in the main text, “Fresh and cumulative LBR did not differ significantly for IVF and ICSI patients (145/468 (31%) vs. 32/87 (36.7%) and 287/468 (61.3%) vs. 52/87 (59.8%), p value = 0.3 and 0.8, respectively))” should be “Fresh and cumulative LBR did not differ significantly for ICSI and IVF patients .........” . 2) There was a wrong transformation of percentages for fresh and cumulative LBR (from the Table to Fig. 3b). Please see below the revised Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 1

Fresh and cumulative LBR according to the insemination method in poor (a) and suboptimal responders (b)