Skip to main content
Log in

Variations in the endometrial receptivity assay (ERA) may actually represent test error

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Cho K, Tan S, Buckett W, Dahan MH. Intra-patient variability in the endometrial receptivity assay (ERA) test. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:929–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1125-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stankewicz T, Valbuena D, Ruiz-Alonso M. Inter-cycle consistency versus test compliance in endometrial receptivity analysis test. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1212-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Díaz-Gimeno P, Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Bosch N, Martínez Conejero JA, Alamá P, et al. The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:508–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael H. Dahan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dahan, M.H., Tan, S.L. Variations in the endometrial receptivity assay (ERA) may actually represent test error. J Assist Reprod Genet 35, 1923–1924 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1279-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1279-1

Navigation