Issues related to human oocyte vitrification: a consideration of the facts

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Practice Committees of American Society for Reproductive Medicine Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(1):37–43.

  2. 2.

    Cobo A, Remohi J, Chang CC, Nagy ZP. Oocyte cryopreservation for donor egg banking. Reprod BioMed Online. 2011;23:341–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Grifo JA, McCulloh DH, Statman LY. Fresh vs cryopreserved donor oocytes. JAMA. 2015;314:2569–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kushnir VA, Darmon SK, Barad DH, Gleicher N. New national outcome data on fresh versus cryopreserved donor oocytes. J Ovarian Res. 2018;11:2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Munne S, Alikani M, Ribustello L, Colls P, Martinez-Ortiz PA, McCulloh DH. Euploidy rates in donor egg cycles significantly differ between fertility centers. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England). 2017;32:743–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sole M, Polyzos N, Llagostera CG, Carrasco B, Coroleu B, Veiga A, et al. Automatic vs manual vitrification of human oocytes. Preliminary results of the first randomised controlled trial using sibling oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:e57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samer Tannus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tannus, S., Dahan, MH., Tan, J. et al. Issues related to human oocyte vitrification: a consideration of the facts. J Assist Reprod Genet 35, 1157–1158 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1184-7

Download citation