Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 367–391 | Cite as

Revisiting embryo assisted hatching approaches: a systematic review of the current protocols

  • Alessandra Alteri
  • Paola Viganò
  • Ahmad Abu Maizar
  • Luca Jovine
  • Elisa Giacomini
  • Patrizia Rubino
Review

Abstract

Zona pellucida (ZP) manipulation, termed “assisted hatching” (AH), has been introduced in order to favor embryo hatching and ultimately improve assisted reproductive technology success but with poor proofs of safety and biological plausibility. We herein provide a systematic review of clinical outcomes following the application of different methods of ZP manipulation on fresh or frozen/thawed embryos at different developmental stages in different groups of patients. Out of the 69 papers that compared the clinical outcomes deriving from hatched versus non-hatched embryos, only 11 considered blastocysts while the rest referred to cleavage stage embryos. The ZP thinning of fresh embryos either by chemical or laser approach was shown to provide very limited benefit in terms of clinical outcomes. Better results were observed with procedures implying a higher degree of zona manipulation, including zona removal. Studies comparing the mechanical or chemical procedures to those laser-mediated consistently reported a superiority of the latter ones over the former. Literature is consistent for a benefit of ZP breaching in thawed blastocysts. This review provides the current knowledge on the AH procedure in order to improve its efficacy in the appropriate context. Embryologists might benefit from the approaches presented herein in order to improve Assisted Reproduction Technologies (ART) outcomes.

Keywords

Zona pellucida Zona hardening Embryo culture Hatching Assisted hatching Implantation failure 

Notes

Author’s roles

A.A., P.V., and P.R. provided a substantial contribution to the review conception. All the authors participated in the draft of the article. All authors approved the final version of the article.

Funding

This work has not been supported by a grant.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Cohen J, Malter H, Fehilly C, Wright G, Elsner C, Kort H, et al. Implantation of embryos after partial opening of oocyte zona pellucida to facilitate sperm penetration. Lancet. 1988;2:162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carney SK, Das S, Blake D, Farquhar C, Seif MM, Nelson L. Assisted hatching on assisted conception in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD001894.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Role of assisted hatching in in vitro fertilization, a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:348–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Selva J. Assisted hatching. Hum Reprod. 2000;4:65–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li D, Yang DL, An J, Jiao J, Zhou YM, Wu QJ, et al. Effect of assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31228.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hammadeh ME, Fischer-Hammadeh C, Ali KR. Assisted hatching in assisted reproduction: a state of the art. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:119–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Primi MP, Senn A, Montag M, Van der Ven H, Mandelbaum J, Veiga A, et al. A European multicentre prospective randomized study to assess the use of assisted hatching with a diode laser and the benefit of an immunosuppressive/antibiotic treatment in different patient populations. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2325–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sifer C, Sellami A, Poncelet C, Kulski P, Martin-Pont B, Bottero J, et al. A prospective randomized study to assess the benefit of partial zona pellucida digestion before frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2384–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Montag M, van der Ven H. Laser-assisted hatching in assisted reproduction. Croat Med J. 1999;40:398–403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmoll F, Schneider H, Montag M, Wimmers K, Rink K, Schellander K. Effects of different laser-drilled openings in the zona pellucida on hatching of in vitro-produced cattle blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(Suppl 2):714–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alikani M, Noyes N, Cohen J, Rosenwaks Z. Monozygotic twinning in the human is associated with the zona pellucid architecture. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1318–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frydman N, Madoux S, Hesters L, Duvernoy C, Feyereisen E, Le Du A, et al. A randomized double-blind controlled study on the efficacy of laser zona pellucida thinning on live birth rates in cases of advanced female age. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2131–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nadir Ciray H, Bener F, Karagenç L, Ulug U, Bahçeci M. Impact of assisted hatching on ART outcome in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2546–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Niimura S. Time-lapse videomicrographic analyses of contractions in mouse blastocysts. J Reprod Dev. 2003;49:413–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khalifa EA, Tucker MJ, Hunt P. Cruciate thinning of the zona pellucida for more successful enhancement of blastocyst hatching in the mouse. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:532–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nakayama T, Fujiwara H, Tastumi K, Fujita K, Higuchi T, Mori T. A new assisted hatching technique using a piezo-micromanipulator. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:784–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fong CY, Bongso A, Ng SC, Kumar J, Trounson A, Ratnam S. Blastocyst transfer after enzymatic treatment of the zona pellucida, improving in-vitro fertilization and understanding implantation. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2926–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gordon JW, Dapunt U. Restoration of normal implantation rates in mouse embryos with a hatching impairment by use of a new method of assisted hatching. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:1302–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tucker MJ, Luecke NM, Wiker SR, Wright G. Chemical removal of the outside of the zona pellucida of day 3 human embryos has no impact on implantation rate. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993;10:187–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cohen J, Elsner C, Kort H, Malter H, Massey J, Mayer MP, et al. Impairment of the hatching process following IVF in the human and improvement of implantation by assisting hatching using micromanipulation. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:7–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fang C, Li T, Miao BY, Zhuang GL, Zhou C. Mechanically expanding the zona pellucida of human frozen thawed embryos, a new method of assisted hatching. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1302–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yano K, Yano C, Kubo T, Ohashi I, Maeda N, Fukaya T. Chemical zona pellucida thinning with acidified Tyrode's solution, comparison between partial and circumferential techniques. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24:471–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jelinkova L, Pavelkova J, Strehler E, Paulus W, Zivny J, Sterzik K. Improved implantation rate after chemical removal of the zona pellucida. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1299–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mansour RT, Rhodes CA, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Kamal A. Transfer of zona-free embryos improves outcome in poor prognosis patients, a prospective randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1061–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bider D, Livshits A, Yonish M, Yemini Z, Mashiach S, Dor J. Assisted hatching by zona drilling of human embryos in women of advanced age. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:317–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Graham MC, Hoeger KM, Phipps WR. Initial IVF-ET experience with assisted hatching performed 3 days after retrieval followed by day 5 embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:668–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mahadevan MM, Miller MM, Maris MO, Moutos D. Assisted hatching of embryos by micromanipulation for human in vitro fertilization, UAMS experience. J Ark Med Soc. 1998;94:529–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schoolcraft WB, Schlenker T, Gee M, Jones GS, Jones HW Jr. Assisted hatching in the treatment of poor prognosis in vitro fertilization candidates. Fertil Steril. 1994;62:551–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Meldrum DR, Wisot A, Yee B, Garzo G, Yeo L, Hamilton F. Assisted hatching reduces the age-related decline in IVF outcome in women younger than age 43 without increasing miscarriage or monozygotic twinning. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15:418–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dayal MB, Kovalevsky G, Patrizio P. Rate of blastocyst development from excess embryos remaining in culture after day 3 embryo transfer. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2006;51:136–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Grace J, Bolton V, Braude P, Khalaf Y. Assisted hatching is more effective when embryo quality was optimal in previous failed IVF/ICSI cycles. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27:56–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hu Y, Hoffman DI, Maxson WS, Ory SJ. Clinical application of nonselective assisted hatching of human embryos. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:991–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hurst BS, Tucker KE, Awoniyi CA, Schlaff WD. Assisted hatching does not enhance IVF success in good-prognosis patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15:62–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cohen J, Alikani M, Trowbridge J, Rosenwaks Z. Implantation enhancement by selective assisted hatching using zona drilling of human embryos with poor prognosis. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:685–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liu C, Litscher ES, Mortillo S, Sakai Y, Kinloch RA, Stewart CL, et al. Targeted disruption of the mZP3 gene results in production of eggs lacking a zona pellucida and infertility in female mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:5431–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tucker MJ, Morton PC, Wright G, Ingargiola PE, Sweitzer CL, Elsner CW, et al. Enhancement of outcome from intracytoplasmic sperm injection, does co-culture or assisted hatching improve implantation rates? Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2434–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lanzendorf SE, Nehchiri F, Mayer JF, Oehninger S, Muasher SJ. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study for the evaluation of assisted hatching in patients with advanced maternal age. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:409–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Fortini D, Aicardi G, Montanaro N. Rescue of implantation potential in embryos with poor prognosis by assisted zona hatching. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1331–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ma S, Rowe T, Yuen BH. Impact of assisted hatching on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection, a prospective, randomized clinical trial and pregnancy follow-up. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:895–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hagemann AR, Lanzendorf SE, Jungheim ES, Chang AS, Ratts VS, Odem RR. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study of assisted hatching in women younger than 38 years undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:586–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Balaban B, Urman B, Alatas C, Mercan R, Mumcu A, Isiklar A. A comparison of four different techniques of assisted hatching. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1239–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hsieh YY, Huang CC, Cheng TC, Chang CC, Tsai HD, Lee MS. Laser-assisted hatching of embryos is better than the chemical method for enhancing the pregnancy rate in women with advanced age. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:179–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Joris H, De Vos A, Janssens R, Devroey P, Liebaers I, Van Steirteghem A. Comparison of the results of human embryo biopsy and outcome of PGD after zona drilling using acid Tyrode medium or a laser. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1896–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kim HJ, Kim CH, Lee SM, Choe SA, Lee JY, Jee BC, et al. Outcomes of preimplantation genetic diagnosis using either zona drilling with acidified Tyrode’s solution or partial zona dissection. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2012;39:118–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lanzendorf SE, Ratts VS, Moley KH, Goldstein JS, Dahan MH, Odem RR. A randomized, prospective study comparing laser-assisted hatching and assisted hatching using acidified medium. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:1450–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Feng HL, Hershlag A, Scholl GM, Cohen MA. A retroprospective study comparing three different assisted hatching techniques. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1323–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Check JH, Hoover L, Nazari A, O'Shaughnessy A, Summers D. The effect of assisted hatching on pregnancy rates after frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:254–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tao J, Tamis R. Application of assisted hatching for 2-day-old, frozen-thawed embryo transfer in a poor-prognosis population. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14:128–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gabrielsen A, Agerholm I, Toft B, Hald F, Petersen K, Aagaard J, et al. Assisted hatching improves implantation rates on cryopreserved-thawed embryos. A randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2258–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Makrakis E, Angeli I, Agapitou K, Pappas K, Dafereras A, Pantos K. Laser versus mechanical assisted hatching, a prospective study of clinical outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1596–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Stein A, Rufas O, Amit S, Avrech O, Pinkas H, Ovadia J, et al. Assisted hatching by partial zona dissection of human pre-embryos in patients with recurrent implantation failure after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:838–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Cieslak J, Ivakhnenko V, Wolf G, Sheleg S, Verlinsky Y. Three-dimensional partial zona dissection for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and assisted hatching. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:308–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Macas E, Imthurn B, Rosselli M, Keller PJ. The chromosomal complements of multipronuclear human zygotes resulting from intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2496–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lyu QF, Wu LQ, Li YP, Pan Q, Liu DE, Xia K, et al. An improved mechanical technique for assisted hatching. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1619–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hellebaut S, De Sutter P, Dozortsev D, Onghena A, Qian C, Dhont M. Does assisted hatching improve implantation rates after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection in all patients? A prospective randomized study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996;13:19–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Chao KH, Chen SU, Chen HF, Wu MY, Yang YS, Ho HN. Assisted hatching increases the implantation and pregnancy rate of in vitro fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer (ET), but not that of IVF-tubal ET in patients with repeated IVF failures. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:904–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Nakayama T, Fujiwara H, Yamada S, Tastumi K, Honda T, Fujii S. Clinical application of a new assisted hatching method using a piezo-micromanipulator for morphologically low-quality embryos in poor-prognosis infertile patients. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:1014–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Parikh FR, Kamat SA, Nadkarni S, Arawandekar D, Parikh RM. Assisted hatching in an in vitro fertilization programme. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1996;50:121–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rufas-Sapir O, Stein A, Orvieto R, Avrech OM, Kotler N, Pinkas H, et al. Is assisted hatching beneficial in patients with recurrent implantation failures? Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2004;31:110–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Edirisinghe WR, Ahnonkitpanit V, Promviengchai S, Suwajanakorn S, Pruksananonda K, Chinpilas V, et al. A study failing to determine significant benefits from assisted hatching, patients selected for advanced age, zonal thickness of embryos, and previous failed attempts. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999;16:294–301.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tucker MJ, Cohen J, Massey JB, Mayer MP, Wiker SR, Wright G. Partial dissection of the zona pellucida of frozen-thawed human embryos may enhance blastocyst hatching, implantation, and pregnancy rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:341–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Vanderzwalmen P, Bertin G, Debauche C, Standaert V, Bollen N, van Roosendaal E, et al. Vitrification of human blastocysts with the hemi-straw carrier, application of assisted hatching after thawing. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1504–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sun ST, Choi JR, Son JB, Joo JK, Ko GR, Lee KS. The effect of long zona dissection using ICSI pipettes for mechanical assisted hatching in vitrified-thawed blastocyst transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:1431–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Tadir Y, Wright WH, Vafa O, Liaw LH, Asch R, Berns MW. Micromanipulation of gametes using laser microbeams. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:1011–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Palanker D, Ohad S, Lewis A, Simon A, Shenkar J, Penchas S, et al. Technique for cellular microsurgery using the 193-nm excimer laser. Lasers Surg Med. 1991;11:580–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Obruca A, Strohmer H, Sakkas D, Menezo Y, Kogosowski A, Barak Y, et al. Use of lasers in assisted fertilization and hatching. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1723–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Germond MK, Rink K, Nocera M, Delacrétaz G, Senn A, Fakan S. Microdissection of mouse and human zona pellucida using a 1.48-μm diode laser beam, efficacy and safety of the procedure. Fertil. Steril. 1995;64:604–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rink K, Delacrétaz G, Salathé RP, Senn A, Nocera D, Germond M, et al. Non-contact microdrilling of mouse zona pellucida with an objective-delivered 1.48-microns diode laser. Lasers Surg Med. 1996;18:52–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Douglas-Hamilton DH, Conia J. Thermal effects in laser-assisted pre-embryo zona drilling. J Biomed Opt. 2001;6:205–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Obruca A, Strohmer H, Blaschitz A, Schonickle E, Dohr G, Feichtinger W. Ultrastructural observations in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos after zona opening using an erbium, yttrium–aluminium garnet Er, (YAG) laser. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2242–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Antinori S, Panci C, Selman HA, Caffa B, Dani G, Versaci C. Zona thinning with the use of laser, a new approach to assisted hatching in humans. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:590–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ali J, Rahbar S, Burjaq H, Sultan AM, Al Flamerzi M, Shahata MA. Routine laser assisted hatching results in significantly increased clinical pregnancies. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20:177–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Valojerdi MR, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Karimian L, Ashtiani SK. Effect of laser zona pellucida opening on clinical outcome of assisted reproduction technology in patients with advanced female age, recurrent implantation failure, or frozen-thawed embryos. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:84–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Sagoskin AW, Levy MJ, Tucker MJ, Richter KS, Widra EA. Laser assisted hatching in good prognosis patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer, a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:283–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Razi MH, Halvaei I, Razi Y. Laser assisted zona hatching does not improve live birth rate in patients undergoing their first ICSI cycles. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013;11:1021–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ghannadi A, Kazerooni M, Jamalzadeh F, Amiri S, Rostami P, Absalan F. The effects of laser assisted hatching on pregnancy rates. Iran J Reprod Med. 2011;9:95–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Kanyo K, Konc J. A follow-up study of children born after diode laser assisted hatching. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;110:176–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Blake DA, Forsberg AS, Johansson BR, Wikland M. Laser zona pellucida thinning—an alternative approach to assisted hatching. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1959–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Lu HF, Peng FS, Chen SU, Chiu BC, Yeh SH, Hsiao SM. The outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and laser assisted hatching in women undergoing in vitro fertilization are affected by the cause of infertility. Int J Fertil Steril. 2015;9:33–40.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Balakier H, Mandel R, Sojecki A, Motamedi G, Zaver S, Librach C. Laser zona thinning in women aged < or = 37 years, a randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1479–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Baruffi RL, Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Ferreira RC, Coelho J, Franco JG Jr. Zona thinning with noncontact diode laser in patients aged < or = 37 years with no previous failure of implantation, a prospective randomized study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17:557–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Ge HS, Zhou W, Zhang W, Lin JJ. Impact of assisted hatching on fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles, a prospective, randomized study. Reprod BioMed Online. 2008;16:589–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Kutlu P, Atvar O, Vanlioglu OF. Laser assisted zona thinning technique has no beneficial effect on the ART outcomes of two different maternal age groups. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:457–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Baruffi RL, Pontes A, Franco Júnior JG. Zona thinning with a noncontact diode laser in ICSI embryos from women of advanced age. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002;19:512–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Baruffi RL, Oliveira JB, Massaro FC, Elder K, et al. Implantation failures, success of assisted hatching with quarter-laser zona thinning. Reprod BioMed Online. 2005;10:224–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mantoudis E, Podsiadly BT, Gorgy A, Venkat G, Craft IL. A comparison between quarter, partial and total laser assisted hatching in selected infertility patients. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2182–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Ghobara TS, Cahill DJ, Ford WC, Collyer HM, Wilson PE, Al-Nuaim L, et al. Effects of assisted hatching method and age on implantation rates of IVF and ICSI. Reprod BioMed Online. 2006;13:261–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Valojerdi MR, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Karimian L, Hassani F, Movaghar B. Effect of laser zona thinning on vitrified-warmed embryo transfer at the cleavage stage, a prospective, randomized study. Reprod BioMed Online. 2010;20:234–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Wan CY, Song C, Diao LH, Li GG, Bao ZJ, Hu XD, et al. Laser-assisted hatching improves clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed blastocysts developed from low-grade cleavage-stage embryos, a prospective randomized study. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;28:582–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Hiraoka K, Fuchiwaki M, Hiraoka K, Horiuchi T, Murakami T, Kinutani M, et al. Effect of the size of zona pellucida opening by laser assisted hatching on clinical outcome of frozen cleaved embryos that were cultured to blastocyst after thawing in women with multiple implantation failures of embryo transfer, a retrospective study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25:129–35.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Hiraoka K, Hiraoka K, Horiuchi T, Kusuda T, Okano S, Kinutani M, et al. Impact of the size of zona pellucida thinning area on vitrified-warmed cleavage-stage embryo transfers, a prospective, randomized study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:515–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Ng EH, Lau EY, Yeung WS, Cheung TM, Tang OS, Ho PC. Randomized double-blind comparison of laser zona pellucida thinning and breaching in frozen-thawed embryo transfer at the cleavage stage. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1147–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Ren X, Liu Q, Chen W, Zhu G, Zhang H. Effect of the site of assisted hatching on vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles, a prospective randomized study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:691–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Miyata H, Matsubayashi H, Fukutomi N, Matsuba J, Koizumi A, Tomiyama T. Relevance of the site of assisted hatching in thawed human blastocysts, a preliminary report. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:2444–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Debrock S, Peeraer K, Spiessens C, Willemen D, De Loecker P, D'Hooghe TM. The effect of modified quarter laser-assisted zona thinning on the implantation rate per embryo in frozen/vitrified-thawed/warmed embryo transfer cycles, a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1997–2007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Zhang XJ, Yang YZ, Lv Q, Min LH, Li XL, Bai P. Effect of the size of zona pellucida thinning by laser assisted hatching on clinical outcome of human frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Cryo Letters. 2009;30:455–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Balaban B, Urman B, Yakin K, Isiklar A. Laser-assisted hatching increases pregnancy and implantation rates in cryopreserved embryos that were allowed to cleave in vitro after thawing, a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2136–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Kanyo K, Zeke J, Kriston R, Szücs Z, Cseh S, Somoskoi B, et al. The impact of laser-assisted hatching on the outcome of frozen human embryo transfer cycles. Zygote. 2016;24:742–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Ng EH, Naveed F, Lau EY, Yeung WS, Chan CC, Tang OS, et al. A randomized double-blind controlled study of the efficacy of laser-assisted hatching on implantation and pregnancy rates of frozen-thawed embryo transfer at the cleavage stage. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:979–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Baruffi RL, Oliveira JB, Felipe V, Massaro FC, et al. Laser-assisted hatching of cryopreserved-thawed embryos by thinning one quarter of the zona. Reprod BioMed Online. 2006;13:668–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Zhou H, Zao W, Zhang W, Shi J, Shi W. No adverse effects were identified on the perinatal outcomes after laser-assisted hatching treatment. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;29:692–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Vajta G, Rienzi L, Bavister BD. Zona-free embryo culture, is it a viable option to improve pregnancy rates? Reprod BioMed Online. 2010;21:17–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Kinget K, Nijs M, Cox AM, Janssen M, Jacobs P, Bosmans E, et al. A novel approach for patients at risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, elective transfer of a single zona-free blastocyst on day 5. Reprod BioMed Online. 2002;4:51–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Isik AZ, Vicdan K, Kaba A, Dagli G. Comparison of zona manipulated and zona intact blastocyst transfers, a prospective randomized trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17:135–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Urman B, Balaban B, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Mumcu A, Isiklar A. Zona-intact versus zona-free blastocyst transfer, a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:392–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Lan KC, Huang FJ, Lin YC, Kung FT, Chang SY. Zona-free versus laser zona-assisted hatching blastocyst transfer, a comparison of outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1959–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Hiraoka K, Fuchiwaki M, Hiraoka K, Horiuchi T, Murakami T, Kinutani M, et al. Zona pellucida removal and vitrified blastocyst transfer outcome, a preliminary study. Reprod BioMed Online. 2007;15:68–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Sunde A, Brison D, Dumoulin J, Harper J, Lundin K, Magli MC, et al. Time to take human embryo culture seriously. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2174–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35:494–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Chiu PCN, Wong BST, Lee CL, Pang RTK, Lee K-F, Sumitro SB, et al. Native human zona pellucida glycoproteins, purification and binding properties. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1385–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Chakravarty S, Kadunganattil S, Bansal P, Sharma RK, Gupta SK. Relevance of glycosylation of human zona pellucida glycoproteins for their binding to capacitated human spermatozoa and subsequent induction of acrosomal exocytosis. Mol Reprod Dev. 2008;75:75–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Chirinos M, Cariño C, González-González ME, Arreola E, Reveles R, Larrea F. Characterization of human sperm binding to homologous recombinant zona pellucida proteins. Reprod Sci. 2011;18:876–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Saldívar-Hernández A, González-González ME, Sánchez-Tusié A, Maldonado-Rosas I, López P, Treviño CL, et al. Human sperm degradation of zona pellucida proteins contributes to fertilization. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:99.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Tsubamoto H. Expression of recombinant human zona pellucida protein 2 and its binding capacity to spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 1999;61:1649–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Avella MA, Xiong B, Dean J. The molecular basis of gamete recognition in mice and humans. Mol Hum Reprod. 2013;19:279–89.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Hoodbhoy T, Dean J. Insights into the molecular basis of sperm-egg recognition in mammals. Reproduction. 2004;127:417–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Coticchio G, Borini A, Distratis V, Maione M, Scaravelli G, Bianchi V, et al. Qualitative and morphometric analysis of the ultrastructure of human oocytes cryopreserved by two alternative slow cooling protocols. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:131–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Nottola SA, Macchiarelli G, Coticchio G, Bianchi S, Cecconi S, De Santis L, et al. Ultrastructure of human mature oocytes after slow cooling cryopreservation using different sucrose concentrations. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1123–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Nottola SA, Coticchio G, De Santis L, Macchiarelli G, Maione M, Bianchi S, et al. Ultrastructure of human mature oocytes after slow cooling cryopreservation with ethylene glycol. Reprod BioMed Online. 2008;17:368–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Patsopoulos NA, Ioannidis JP. The use of older studies in meta-analyses of medical interventions, a survey. Open Med. 2009;3:e62–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Zeng M, Su S, Li L. The effect of laser-assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes of cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Med Sci. 2017;  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2372-x.
  123. 123.
    Vanderzwalmen P, Bertin G, Debauche C, Standaert V, van Roosendaal E, Vandervorst M, et al. Births after vitrification at morulaand blastocyst stages, effect of artificial reduction of the blastocoeliccavity before vitrification. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:744–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Ueno S, Ezoe K, Yabuuchi A, Uchiyama K, Okimura T, Okuno T, et al. Complete zona pellucida removal from vitrified-warmed human blastocysts facilitates earlier in-vitro attachment and outgrowth. Reprod BioMed Online. 2016;33:140–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandra Alteri
    • 1
  • Paola Viganò
    • 2
  • Ahmad Abu Maizar
    • 3
  • Luca Jovine
    • 4
  • Elisa Giacomini
    • 2
  • Patrizia Rubino
    • 5
  1. 1.Obstetrics and Gynaecology DepartmentIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
  2. 2.Reproductive Sciences Laboratory, Division of Genetics and Cell BiologyIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
  3. 3.California Fertility PartnersLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Department of Biosciences and Nutrition & Center for Innovative MedicineKarolinska InstitutetHuddingeSweden
  5. 5.HRC FertilityPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations