Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 491–501 | Cite as

Effect of erythrocyte-sperm separation medium on nuclear, acrosomal, and membrane maturity parameters in human sperm

  • Bikem Soygur
  • Soner Celik
  • Ciler Celik-Ozenci
  • Leyla Sati
Gamete Biology

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether erythrocyte-sperm separation medium (ESSM) has effects on human sperm motility, morphology, viability, membrane maturity, acrosome integrity, and nuclear attributes before and after cryopreservation.

Methods

Semen samples from normozoospermic (n = 36) and oligozoospermic (n = 9) patients were analyzed. Samples from the same patient were divided into three aliquots: group 1 and group 2 were resuspended in sperm washing media and ESSM, respectively. Group 3 was resuspended in ESSM with blood sample to mimic the extensive number of erythrocytes in the testicular sperm extraction (TESE) material. All groups were evaluated for sperm concentration, motility, Kruger/Tygerberg strict morphology, viability by eosin-nigrosin staining, membrane maturity by hyaluronic acid-binding assay (HBA), acrosomal integrity by Pisum sativum lectin staining, chromatin maturity by aniline blue staining, and DNA integrity by TUNEL assay before and after cryopreservation.

Results

No significant difference was determined between ESSM-treated and ESSM-untreated sperm samples for the sperm parameters tested (p > 0.05). After cryopreservation, total sperm motility and viability decreased regardless of ESSM used. The percentages of sperm with Tygerberg normal morphology, intact acrosome, and HA-bound sperm were found to be lower in oligozoospermic samples before cryopreservation in each group. However, no statistically significant differences were found between oligozoospermic and normozoospermic samples when all groups were compared. Thus, ESSM treatment did not cause a significant change on sperm motility, normal morphology, viability, HA-binding capacity, chromatin maturity, and DNA fragmentation.

Conclusion

ESSM can enhance the efficiency of sperm retrieval protocol and can also decrease the time required to collect spermatozoa while not affecting sperm morphogenetic properties.

Keywords

Erythrocyte-sperm separation TESE Human sperm maturity Sperm parameters Cryopreservation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Rebecca Jaszczak from University of California San Francisco for proof reading the article.

Funding

This study was supported by Akdeniz University Research Foundation with grant number 2013.01.0103.011.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Fathalla MF. Reproductive health: a global overview. Early Hum Dev. 1992;29(1–3):35–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ombelet W, Cooke I, Dyer S, Serour G, Devroey P. Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(6):605–21.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmn042.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(4):411–26.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340(8810):17–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schlegel PN, Palermo GD, Goldstein M, Menendez S, Zaninovic N, Veeck LL, et al. Testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for nonobstructive azoospermia. Urology. 1997;49(3):435–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00032-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, Tournaye H, Silber SJ, Van Steirteghem AC. Normal fertilization of human oocytes after testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1994;62(3):639–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nagy Z, Liu J, Cecile J, Silber S, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Using ejaculated, fresh, and frozen-thawed epididymal and testicular spermatozoa gives rise to comparable results after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1995;63(4):808–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donoso P, Tournaye H, Devroey P. Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(6):539–49.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmm029.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verheyen G, De Croo I, Tournaye H, Pletincx I, Devroey P, van Steirteghem AC. Comparison of four mechanical methods to retrieve spermatozoa from testicular tissue. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(11):2956–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crabbe E, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Van Steirteghem A. The use of enzymatic procedures to recover testicular germ cells. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(8):1682–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aydos K, Demirel LC, Baltaci V, Unlu C. Enzymatic digestion plus mechanical searching improves testicular sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;120(1):80–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.10.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fischer R, Baukloh V, Naether OG, Schulze W, Salzbrunn A, Benson DM. Pregnancy after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of spermatozoa extracted from frozen-thawed testicular biopsy. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(10):2197–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salzbrunn A, Benson DM, Holstein AF, Schulze W. A new concept for the extraction of testicular spermatozoa as a tool for assisted fertilization (ICSI). Hum Reprod. 1996;11(4):752–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dym M, Fawcett DW. Further observations on the numbers of spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and spermatids connected by intercellular bridges in the mammalian testis. Biol Reprod. 1971;4(2):195–215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vloeberghs V, Verheyen G, Haentjens P, Goossens A, Polyzos NP, Tournaye H. How successful is TESE-ICSI in couples with non-obstructive azoospermia? Hum Reprod. 2015;30(8):1790–6.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ben-Yosef D, Yogev L, Hauser R, Yavetz H, Azem F, Yovel I, et al. Testicular sperm retrieval and cryopreservation prior to initiating ovarian stimulation as the first line approach in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(7):1794–801.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ulug U, Bener F, Karagenc L, Ciray N, Bahceci M. Outcomes in couples undergoing ICSI: comparison between fresh and frozen-thawed surgically retrieved spermatozoa. Int J Androl. 2005;28(6):343–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00559.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schlegel PN, Su LM. Physiological consequences of testicular sperm extraction. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(8):1688–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nagy ZP, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. An improved treatment procedure for testicular biopsy specimens offers more efficient sperm recovery: case series. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(2):376–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Organization WH. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FS, Lombard CJ, Van der Merwe JP, van Zyl JA, et al. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1986;46(6):1118–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Menkveld R, Stander FS, Kotze TJ, Kruger TF, van Zyl JA. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod. 1990;5(5):586–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Prinosilova P, Kruger T, Sati L, Ozkavukcu S, Vigue L, Kovanci E, et al. Selectivity of hyaluronic acid binding for spermatozoa with normal Tygerberg strict morphology. Reprod BioMed Online. 2009;18(2):177–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bjorndahl L, Soderlund I, Kvist U. Evaluation of the one-step eosin-nigrosin staining technique for human sperm vitality assessment. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(4):813–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eppig JJ. FSH stimulates hyaluronic acid synthesis by oocyte-cumulus cell complexes from mouse preovulatory follicles. Nature. 1979;281(5731):483–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dandekar P, Aggeler J, Talbot P. Structure, distribution and composition of the extracellular matrix of human oocytes and cumulus masses. Hum Reprod. 1992;7(3):391–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Salustri A, Camaioni A, Di Giacomo M, Fulop C, Hascall VC. Hyaluronan and proteoglycans in ovarian follicles. Hum Reprod Update. 1999;5(4):293–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cayli S, Jakab A, Ovari L, Delpiano E, Celik-Ozenci C, Sakkas D, et al. Biochemical markers of sperm function: male fertility and sperm selection for ICSI. Reprod BioMed Online. 2003;7(4):462–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cayli S, Sakkas D, Vigue L, Demir R, Huszar G. Cellular maturity and apoptosis in human sperm: creatine kinase, caspase-3 and Bcl-XL levels in mature and diminished maturity sperm. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004;10(5):365–72.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gah050.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huszar G, Ozenci CC, Cayli S, Zavaczki Z, Hansch E, Vigue L. Hyaluronic acid binding by human sperm indicates cellular maturity, viability, and unreacted acrosomal status. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(Suppl 3):1616–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Huszar G, Ozkavukcu S, Jakab A, Celik-Ozenci C, Sati GL, Cayli S. Hyaluronic acid binding ability of human sperm reflects cellular maturity and fertilizing potential: selection of sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;18(3):260–7.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gco.0000193018.98061.2f.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sati L, Cayli S, Delpiano E, Sakkas D, Huszar G. The pattern of tyrosine phosphorylation in human sperm in response to binding to zona pellucida or hyaluronic acid. Reprod Sci. 2014;21(5):573–81.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719113504467.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Flesch FM, Voorhout WF, Colenbrander B, van Golde LM, Gadella BM. Use of lectins to characterize plasma membrane preparations from boar spermatozoa: a novel technique for monitoring membrane purity and quantity. Biol Reprod. 1998;59(6):1530–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chan JZ, Krause W, Bohring C. Computer-assisted analysis of sperm morphology with the aid of lectin staining. Andrologia. 2002;34(6):379–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mendoza C, Carreras A, Moos J, Tesarik J. Distinction between true acrosome reaction and degenerative acrosome loss by a one-step staining method using Pisum sativum agglutinin. J Reprod Fertil. 1992;95(3):755–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kohn FM, Mack SR, Schill WB, Zaneveld LJ. Detection of human sperm acrosome reaction: comparison between methods using double staining, Pisum sativum agglutinin, concanavalin A and transmission electron microscopy. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(4):714–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Auger J, Mesbah M, Huber C, Dadoune JP. Aniline blue staining as a marker of sperm chromatin defects associated with different semen characteristics discriminates between proven fertile and suspected infertile men. Int J Androl. 1990;13(6):452–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sati L, Huszar G. Methodology of aniline blue staining of chromatin and the assessment of the associated nuclear and cytoplasmic attributes in human sperm. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;927:425–36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-038-0_36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sati L, Ovari L, Bennett D, Simon SD, Demir R, Huszar G. Double probing of human spermatozoa for persistent histones, surplus cytoplasm, apoptosis and DNA fragmentation. Reprod BioMed Online. 2008;16(4):570–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ovari L, Sati L, Stronk J, Borsos A, Ward DC, Huszar G. Double probing individual human spermatozoa: aniline blue staining for persistent histones and fluorescence in situ hybridization for aneuploidies. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(7):2255–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.033.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, Goossens A, Tournaye H, Camus M, et al. Pregnancies after testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(6):1457–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Huszar G, Vigue L, Corrales M. Sperm creatine phosphokinase activity as a measure of sperm quality in normospermic, variablespermic, and oligospermic men. Biol Reprod. 1988;38(5):1061–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sakkas D, Ramalingam M, Garrido N, Barratt CL. Sperm selection in natural conception: what can we learn from Mother Nature to improve assisted reproduction outcomes? Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(6):711–26.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv042.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ozkavukcu S, Erdemli E, Isik A, Oztuna D, Karahuseyinoglu S. Effects of cryopreservation on sperm parameters and ultrastructural morphology of human spermatozoa. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25(8):403–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-008-9232-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zribi N, Feki Chakroun N, El Euch H, Gargouri J, Bahloul A, Ammar KL. Effects of cryopreservation on human sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(1):159–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.038.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Oberoi B, Kumar S, Talwar P. Study of human sperm motility post cryopreservation. Med J Armed Forces India. 2014;70(4):349–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.09.006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Menkveld R, Holleboom CA, Rhemrev JP. Measurement and significance of sperm morphology. Asian J Androl. 2011;13(1):59–68.  https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2010.67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kihaile P, Hirotsuru K, Kumasako Y, Misumi J, Utsunomiya T. Fertilization rates of small-head sperm in conventional IVF and ICSI. Arch Androl. 2003;49(5):327–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kahraman S, Akarsu C, Cengiz G, Dirican K, Sozen E, Can B, et al. Fertility of ejaculated and testicular megalohead spermatozoa with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(3):726–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Huszar G, Jakab A, Sakkas D, Ozenci CC, Cayli S, Delpiano E, et al. Fertility testing and ICSI sperm selection by hyaluronic acid binding: clinical and genetic aspects. Reprod BioMed Online. 2007;14(5):650–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cross NL, Hanks SE. Effects of cryopreservation on human sperm acrosomes. Hum Reprod. 1991;6(9):1279–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Katayose H, Yanagida K, Hayashi S, Kuretake S, Morozumi K, Sato A. Fertilization failure from a sperm chromatin defect in couples with unexplained infertility. J Reprod Med. 2004;49(9):727–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Salian SR, Kalthur G, Uppangala S, Kumar P, Adiga SK. Frozen-thawed spermatozoa from oligozoospermic ejaculates are susceptible to in situ DNA fragmentation in polyvinylpyrrolidone-based sperm-immobilization medium. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(2):321–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.040.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Suganuma R, Yanagimachi R, Meistrich ML. Decline in fertility of mouse sperm with abnormal chromatin during epididymal passage as revealed by ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(11):3101–8.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Greco E, Scarselli F, Iacobelli M, Rienzi L, Ubaldi F, Ferrero S, et al. Efficient treatment of infertility due to sperm DNA damage by ICSI with testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(1):226–30.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh590.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bikem Soygur
    • 1
  • Soner Celik
    • 1
  • Ciler Celik-Ozenci
    • 1
  • Leyla Sati
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Histology and EmbryologyAkdeniz University School of Medicine CampusAntalyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations