Morbid obesity and pregnancy outcomes after single blastocyst transfer: a retrospective, North American study
- 219 Downloads
Maternal obesity has been shown to affect reproductive function and pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization. More recently, studies have demonstrated lower live birth rates after single blastocyst transfer (SBT) in patients who are overweight or obese. However, the impact of morbid obesity on pregnancy outcomes after SBT has not been well elucidated. The present study aimed to determine whether morbid obesity has a detrimental impact on pregnancy outcomes after SBT in a North American population.
A retrospective, cohort study including 520 nulliparous and multiparous women undergoing top-quality SBT between August 2010 and March 2014 at a University Health Centre in North America was conducted. Primary outcomes included: miscarriage rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate. Subjects were divided into different BMI categories (kg/m2), including <20, 20–24.9, 25.0–29.9, 30–40, and 40 or more.
The miscarriage rate per pregnancy for each group, respectively, was 36, 64, 59, 61, and 50% (p = 0.16); the clinical pregnancy (per patient) rate per group was 36, 52, 38, 26, and 10% (p = 0.009); and the live birth rate (per patient) per group was 35, 50, 38, 26 and 10% (p = 0.03).
Morbid obesity is a strong and independent predictor of poor pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing top-quality SBT.
KeywordsSingle blastocyst transfer Body mass index Live birth rate IVF North America
Single blastocyst transfer
Clinical pregnancy rate
Live birth rate
Polycystic ovarian morphology
MR: Participated in data extraction and manuscript drafting and revision
TS: Participated in the revision of the manuscript
SA: Participated in the revision of the manuscript
MD: Participated in the data extraction and manuscript drafting and revision
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest..
- 1.WHO. Obesity and overweight. Fact sheet 311; Updated January 2015:1–7. 2015. Retrieved December 6, 2015 from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/.
- 2.NIH National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Overweight and obesity statistics. WIN Weight-Control Information Network, 04(4158), 6. 2010. Retrieved December 6, 2015 from http://win.niddk.nih.gov/publications/PDFs/stat904z.pdf.
- 3.National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. 1998. 98–4083. Retrieved on December 6, 2015 from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/archive/clinical-guidelines-obesity-adults-evidence-report.
- 9.Provost MP, Acharya KS, Acharya CR, Yeh JS, Steward RG, Eaton JL, et al. Pregnancy outcomes decline with increasing body mass index: analysis of 239,127 fresh autologous in vitro fertilization cycles from the 2008-2010 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertil Steril. 2015; 105:663–669Google Scholar
- 10.Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjö T, Jablonowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell A, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. 2009;2392–402. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041032.
- 15.Sifer C, Herbemont C, Adda-Herzog E, Sermondade N, Dupont C, Cedrin-Durnerin I, et al. Clinical predictive criteria associated with live birth following elective single embryo transfer. EJOG. 2014;181:229–32.Google Scholar
- 16.Dahan MH, Agdi M, Shehata F, Son W, Tan SL. A comparison of outcomes from in vitro fertilization cycles stimulated with either recombinant luteinizing hormone (LH) or human chorionic gonadotropin acting as an LH analogue delivered as human menopausal gonadotropins, in subjects with good or poor ovarian reserve: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;172:70–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocyst. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, editors. Towards reproductive certainty: infertility and genetics beyond 1999. Carnforth: Parthenon Press; 1999. p. 378–88.Google Scholar
- 18.Baker VL, Jones CE, Cometti B, Hoehler F, Salle B, Urbancsek J, et al. Factors affecting success rates in two concurrent clinical IVF trials: an examination of potential explanations for the difference in pregnancy rates between the United States and Europe. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1287–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar