Skip to main content
Log in

Blastocyst culture using single versus sequential media in clinical IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to undertake a review of the available evidence comparing the use of a single medium versus sequential media for embryo culture to the blastocyst stage in clinical IVF.

Methods

We searched the Cochrane Central, PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, Current Controlled Trials and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to identify randomized controlled trials comparing single versus sequential media for blastocyst culture and ongoing pregnancy rate. Included studies randomized either oocytes/zygotes or women. Eligible oocyte/zygote studies were analyzed to assess the risk difference (RD) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) between the two media systems; eligible woman-based studies were analyzed to assess the risk ratio (RR) and 95 % CI for clinical pregnancy rate.

Results

No differences were observed between single and sequential media for either ongoing pregnancy per randomized woman (relative risk (RR) = 0.9, 95 % CI = 0.7 to 1.3, two studies including 246 women, I 2 = 0 %) or clinical pregnancy per randomized woman (RR = 1.0, 95 % CI = 0.7 to 1.4, one study including 100 women); or miscarriage per clinical pregnancy: RR = 1.3, 95 % CI = 0.4 to 4.3, two studies including 246 participants, I 2 = 0 %). Single media use was associated with an increase blastocyst formation per randomized oocyte/zygote (relative distribution (RD) = +0.06, 95 % CI = +0.01 to +0.12, ten studies including 7455 oocytes/zygotes, I 2 = 83 %) but not top/high blastocyst formation (RD = +0.05, 95 % CI = −0.01 to +0.11, five studies including 3879 oocytes/zygotes, I 2 = 93 %). The overall quality of the evidence was very low for all these four outcomes.

Conclusions

Although using a single medium for extended culture has some practical advantages and blastocyst formation rates appear to be higher, there is insufficient evidence to recommend either sequential or single-step media as being superior for the culture of embryos to days 5/6. Future studies comparing these two media systems in well-designed trials should be performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Youssef MM, Mantikou E, van Wely M, Van der Veen F, Al-Inany HG, Repping S et al. Culture media for human pre-implantation embryos in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;CD007876.

  2. Summers MC, Biggers JD. Chemically defined media and the culture of mammalian preimplantation embryos: historical perspective and current issues. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:557–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Machtinger R, Racowsky C. Culture systems: single step. In: Smith GD, Swain JE, Pool TB, eds. Embryo Culture. Vol. 912: Humana Press, 2012:199–209.

  4. Quinn P. Culture systems: sequential. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;912:211–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolton VN, Wren ME, Parsons JH. Pregnancies after in vitro fertilization and transfer of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:830–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hardy K, Handyside AH, Winston RM. The human blastocyst: cell number, death and allocation during late preimplantation development in vitro. Development. 1989;107:597–604.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dokras A, Sargent IL, Barlow DH. Human blastocyst grading: an indicator of developmental potential? Hum Reprod. 1993;8:2119–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Noda Y, Goto Y, Umaoka Y, Shiotani M, Nakayama T, Mori T. Culture of human embryos in alpha modification of Eagle’s medium under low oxygen tension and low illumination. Fertil Steril. 1994;62:1022–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gardner DK, Lane M, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF. Hum Reprod. 2000;15 Suppl 6:9–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gardner D, Schoolcraft W. In vitro culture of the human blastocyst. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, editors. Towards reproductive certainty: infertility and genetics beyond 1999. Carnforth, UK: Parthenon Publishing; 1999. p. 378–88.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gardner DK, Lane M, Calderon I, Leeton J. Environment of the preimplantation human embryo in vivo: metabolite analysis of oviduct and uterine fluids and metabolism of cumulus cells. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:349–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gardner DK, Lane M. Culture of viable human blastocysts in defined sequential serum-free media. Hum Reprod. 1998;13 Suppl 3:148–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gardner D, Lane M. Culture and selection of viable human blastocysts: a feasible proposition of human IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 1997;3:367–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawitts JA, Biggers JD. Optimization of mouse embryo culture media using simplex methods. J Reprod Fertil. 1991;91:543–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Biggers JD, Racowsky C. The development of fertilized human ova to the blastocyst stage in KSOM(AA) medium: is a two-step protocol necessary? Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;5:133–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wiemer KE, Anderson AR, Kyslinger ML, Weikert ML. Embryonic development and pregnancies following sequential culture in human tubal fluid and a modified simplex optimized medium containing amino acids. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;5:323–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Biggers J, Summers M. Choosing a culture medium: making informed choices. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011], 2011.

  19. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:383–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Basile N, Morbeck D, Garcia-Velasco J, Bronet F, Meseguer M. Type of culture media does not affect embryo kinetics: a time-lapse analysis of sibling oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:634–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Paternot G, Debrock S, D’Hooghe TM, Spiessens C. Early embryo development in a sequential versus single medium: a randomized study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kemeter P, Hajek J, Carli L, Feichtinger W. Current issue: a prospective randomized study comparing two embryo culture systems after IVF/ICSI: sequential media in 5% O2 atmosphere and single medium in 21% O2 atmosphere. J Gynakolo Endokrinol. 2011;21:2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Alteri A, Fabozzi G, Rega E, Starita MF, Giannini P, Piscitelli C, et al. Blastocyst development in single-step versus sequential culture media of the same brand: analysis of 386 sibling oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:O–105.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Donmez E, Sati L, Tuysuz G, Gokalp-Kaya D, Celik S, Demirel LC. A randomized comparison of sequential and single step culture media systems on sibling oocytes: complete p-1 versus single step medium. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khoury C, Coffler M, Potter D, Frederick J, Battaglia D. Improved blastocyst development using a single step medium versus a sequential medium. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:S4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Koyner P, Castillo-Baso J, Sugasti S, De Armas R, Berbey RD. Embryo development and reproductive outcomes using single medium system (SMS) with 50% of medium renew every 48 hours. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:S26–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Patrick JL, Welch L, Teaff N, Whelan J, Crain JMW. Comparative assessment of blastocyst conversion rates in sequential vs continuous culture systems. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:S28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sepulveda S, Garcia J, Arriaga E, Diaz J, Noriega-Portella L, Noriega-Hoces L. In vitro development and pregnancy outcomes for human embryos cultured in either a single medium or in a sequential media system. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1765–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sfontouris IA, Kolibianakis EM, Lainas GT, Zorzovilis IZ, Petsas GK, Lainas TG. Blastocyst development in single-step versus sequential culture media: a prospective randomized study with sibling oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:i2.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Werner MD, Hong KH, Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Reda CV, Molinaro TA, et al. Sequential versus Monophasic Media Impact Trial (SuMMIT): a paired randomized controlled trial comparing a sequential media system to a monophasic medium. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1215–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang Z, Liu J, Kuang Y, Terigima S, Salem R. Time-lapse and array CGH evaluation of human embryos cultured in single versus sequential media: a randomized pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:i73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Summers MC, Bird S, Mirzai FM, Thornhill A, Biggers JD. Human preimplantation embryo development in vitro: a morphological assessment of sibling zygotes cultured in a single medium or in sequential media. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2013;16:278–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Macklon NS, Pieters MH, Hassan MA, Jeucken PH, Eijkemans MJ, Fauser BC. A prospective randomized comparison of sequential versus monoculture systems for in-vitro human blastocyst development. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2700–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sfontouris IA, Kolibianakis EM, Lainas GT, Zorzovilis IZ, Petsas GK, Lainas TG. Similar implantation and pregnancy rates using a single medium versus sequential media for embryo culture: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:i232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hardarson T, Bungum M, Conaghan J, Meintjes M, Chantilis SJ, Molnar L, et al. Noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial comparing embryo development using media developed for sequential or undisturbed culture in a time-lapse setup. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1452–9. e1451-1454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Reed ML, Hamic A, Thompson DJ, Caperton CL. Continuous uninterrupted single medium culture without medium renewal versus sequential media culture: a sibling embryo study. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1783–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schneider DT, Verza S, Esteves SC. Single or sequential medium are equally effective for the culture of human embryos to the blastocyst stage: a pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:S231–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vansteenbrugge A, Vastersaegher C, Fontaine P, Klay C, Rodez D, Pauwels P-C. Comparison of a single medium with sequential media for the development of human zygotes to the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:S319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Velez de la Calle J, Pfeffer J, Taar JP, Prigent Y. Blastocyst outcomes after sequential media culture vs single step media culture in a human IVF program. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:S253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ciray HN, Aksoy T, Goktas C, Ozturk B, Bahceci M. Time-lapse evaluation of human embryo development in single versus sequential culture media—a sibling oocyte study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:891–900.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Koscinski I, Ladureau-Fritsch L, Greze C, Celebi C, Lichtblau I, Teletin M, et al. Comparison of embryo culture with a single medium, global, lifeglobal or with sequential media from Cook laboratories in a prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:i187.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Scarica C, Ubaldi F, Orlando G, Dovere L, Maggiulli R, Stoppa M, et al. Single step versus sequential culture medium: effects on embryo development, genetic and clinical outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:i24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  43. De Vos A, Janssens R, VandeVelde H, Haentjens P, Bonduelle M, Tournaye H, et al. The type of culture medium and the duration of in vitro culture do not influence birthweight of ART singletons. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:20–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pelinck MJ, Hadders-Algra M, Haadsma ML, Nijhuis WL, Kiewiet SM, Hoek A, et al. Is the birthweight of singletons born after IVF reduced by ovarian stimulation or by IVF laboratory procedures? Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:245–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Morbeck DE, Krisher RL, Herrick JR, Baumann NA, Matern D, Moyer T. Composition of commercial media used for human embryo culture. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:759–66. e759.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bolton VN, Cutting R, Clarke H, Brison DR. ACE consensus meeting report: culture systems. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2014;17:239–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Vergouw CG, Kostelijk EH, Doejaaren E, Hompes PG, Lambalk CB, Schats R. The influence of the type of embryo culture medium on neonatal birthweight after single embryo transfer in IVF. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2619–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bouillon C, Leandri R, Desch L, Ernst A, Bruno C, Cerf C, et al. Does embryo culture medium influence the health and development of children born after in vitro fertilization? PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150857.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Eaton JL, Lieberman ES, Stearns C, Chinchilla M, Racowsky C. Embryo culture media and neonatal birthweight following IVF. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:375–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kleijkers SH, Eijssen LM, Coonen E, Derhaag JG, Mantikou E, Jonker MJ, et al. Differences in gene expression profiles between human preimplantation embryos cultured in two different IVF culture media. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2303–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kleijkers SH, van Montfoort AP, Smits LJ, Viechtbauer W, Roseboom TJ, Nelissen EC, et al. IVF culture medium affects post-natal weight in humans during the first 2 years of life. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:661–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lemmen JG, Pinborg A, Rasmussen S, Ziebe S. Birthweight distribution in ART singletons resulting from embryo culture in two different culture media compared with the national population. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2326–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Nelissen EC, Van Montfoort AP, Coonen E, Derhaag JG, Geraedts JP, Smits LJ, et al. Further evidence that culture media affect perinatal outcome: findings after transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1966–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Nelissen EC, Van Montfoort AP, Smits LJ, Menheere PP, Evers JL, Coonen E, et al. IVF culture medium affects human intrauterine growth as early as the second trimester of pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2067–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Zandstra H, Van Montfoort AP, Dumoulin JC. Does the type of culture medium used influence birthweight of children born after IVF? Hum Reprod. 2015;30:530–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhu J, Li M, Chen L, Liu P, Qiao J. The protein source in embryo culture media influences birthweight: a comparative study between G1 v5 and G1-PLUS v5. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1387–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Harbin Consensus Conference Workshop Group. Improving the reporting of clinical trials of infertility treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statement. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:952–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Harbin Consensus Conference Workshop Group. Improving the reporting of clinical trials of infertility treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statement. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2075–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Biggers JD, McGinnis LK, Lawitts JA. One-step versus two-step culture of mouse preimplantation embryos: is there a difference? Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3376–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Costa-Borges N, Bellés M, Meseguer M, Galliano D, Ballesteros A, Calderón G. Blastocyst development in single medium with or without renewal on day 3: a prospective cohort study on sibling donor oocytes in a time-lapse incubator. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:707–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Xie Y, Wang F, Puscheck EE, Rappolee DA. Pipetting causes shear stress and elevation of phosphorylated stress-activated protein kinase/jun kinase in preimplantation embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 2007;74:1287–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Racowsky C, Kovacs P, Martins WP. A critical appraisal of time-lapse imaging for embryo selection: where are we and where do we need to go? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:1025–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Racowsky.

Additional information

Declaration of Authors’ Roles

Conception and design (CR, LR, WPM, IAS, and NR-F); search strategy (WPM, IAS); data extraction (WPM, PAN, IGRV, CON), analysis, and interpretation (all authors); writing the article (all authors). All authors had full access to all the data in the study and approved the final manuscript.

Capsule

In conclusion, there is insufficient evidence to recommend either sequential or single-step media as being superior for the culture of embryos to days 5/6 blastocyst stage.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM. 1

(DOC 14.5 kb)

ESM. 2

(DOC 14.5 kb)

ESM. 3

(DOC 15 kb)

ESM. 4

(DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sfontouris, I.A., Martins, W.P., Nastri, C.O. et al. Blastocyst culture using single versus sequential media in clinical IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Assist Reprod Genet 33, 1261–1272 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0774-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0774-5

Keywords

Navigation