Skip to main content
Log in

Does combining magnetic-activated cell sorting with density gradient or swim-up improve sperm selection?

  • Gamete Biology
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The present study aimed to evaluate whether combining the magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) with density-gradient (DG) or swim-up (SU) sperm separation techniques can improve sperm selection to obtain higher quality spermatozoa.

Methods

Two commonly used sperm selection techniques, SU and DG, were compared to MACS combined with either SU or DG. Spermatozoa obtained from normozoospermic (n = 10) and oligozoospermic (n = 10) cases were grouped as SU, DG, SU+MACS, and DG+MACS followed by the analysis of sperm morphology, motility, DNA integrity, and the levels of Izumo-1 and PLCZ proteins.

Results

Although spermatozoa obtained by SU or DG when combined with MACS have improved aspects when compared to SU or DG alone, results did not reach a statistically significant level. Moreover, separation with MACS caused a significant loss in the numbers of total and rapid progressive spermatozoa.

Conclusions

Considering the cost/benefit ratio, MACS application together with traditional techniques may only be preferred in certain cases having higher concentrations of spermatozoa, but it does not seem to be an ideal and practical sperm selection technique for routine use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McDowell S, Kroon B, Ford E, Hook Y, Glujovsky D, Yazdani A. Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10:CD010461. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010461.pub2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Said TM, Grunewald S, Paasch U, Glander HJ, Baumann T, Kriegel C, et al. Advantage of combining magnetic cell separation with sperm preparation techniques. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10(6):740–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li Y. Whether sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation has an effect on pregnancy and miscarriage after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(4):998–1005 e8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Romany L, Garrido N, Motato Y, Aparicio B, Remohi J, Meseguer M. Removal of annexin V-positive sperm cells for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in ovum donation cycles does not improve reproductive outcome: a controlled and randomized trial in unselected males. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(6):1567–75 e1. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Inoue N, Ikawa M, Isotani A, Okabe M. The immunoglobulin superfamily protein Izumo is required for sperm to fuse with eggs. Nature. 2005;434(7030):234–8. doi:10.1038/nature03362.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saunders CM, Larman MG, Parrington J, Cox LJ, Royse J, Blayney LM, et al. PLC zeta: a sperm-specific trigger of Ca(2+) oscillations in eggs and embryo development. Development. 2002;129(15):3533–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization DoRHaR. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Fifth ed. WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland World Health Organization; 2010.

  8. Menkveld R, Stander FS, Kotze TJ, Kruger TF, van Zyl JA. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod. 1990;5(5):586–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simoes R, Feitosa WB, Mendes CM, Marques MG, Nicacio AC, de Barros FR, et al. Use of chromomycin A3 staining in bovine sperm cells for detection of protamine deficiency. Biotech Histochem. 2009;84(3):79–83. doi:10.1080/10520290902843595.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Curti G, Skowronek F, Vernochi R, Rodriguez-Buzzi AL, Rodriguez-Buzzi JC, Casanova G, et al. Morphological evaluation of sperm from infertile men selected by magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS). Reprod Biol. 2014;14(4):289–92. doi:10.1016/j.repbio.2014.07.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Santiso R, Tamayo M, Gosalvez J, Meseguer M, Garrido N, Fernandez JL. Swim-up procedure selects spermatozoa with longer telomere length. Mutat Res. 2010;688(1–2):88–90. doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.03.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang Q, Zhang N, Zhao F, Zhao W, Dai S, Liu J, et al. Processing of semen by density gradient centrifugation selects spermatozoa with longer telomeres for assisted reproduction techniques. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31(1):44–50. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.02.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bucar S, Goncalves A, Rocha E, Barros A, Sousa M, Sa R. DNA fragmentation in human sperm after magnetic-activated cell sorting. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(1):147–54. doi:10.1007/s10815-014-0370-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thilagavathi J, Kumar M, Mishra SS, Venkatesh S, Kumar R, Dada R. Analysis of sperm telomere length in men with idiopathic infertility. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287(4):803–7. doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2632-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Treff NR, Su J, Taylor D, Scott Jr RT. Telomere DNA deficiency is associated with development of human embryonic aneuploidy. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(6):e1002161. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK, 213S019) and Ankara University Scientific Research Project Coordination (AU-BAP 13O3330001). Preliminary outcomes of this study were presented in the ESHRE 2015 in Lisbon, Portugal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozgur Cinar.

Additional information

Capsule

MACS application together with traditional techniques may be preferred in certain cases having higher concentrations of spermatozoa, although it seems that more powerful and practical sperm selection techniques are still needed for routine use.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cakar, Z., Cetinkaya, B., Aras, D. et al. Does combining magnetic-activated cell sorting with density gradient or swim-up improve sperm selection?. J Assist Reprod Genet 33, 1059–1065 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0742-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0742-0

Keywords

Navigation