Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The association between multinucleated blastomeres and poor ovarian response under the Bologna criteria

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the occurrence of multinucleated blastomeres (MNB) in poor ovarian response (POR) women defined under the Bologna criteria.

Methods

This observational study was designed in a prospective controlled manner. Among 380 cases evaluated for eligibility, 102 women were found suitable and recruited; 51 with POR in accordance with the Bologna criteria defined as the study group and 51 with normal ovarian response defined as the control group.

Results

Among the 51 women in each group, 8 and 2 did not achieve embryos in the study and control group, respectively (P < 0.05). The percentage of women that had at least one embryo with one MNB was significantly higher in the study as compared to the control group, corresponding to 49 and 29 %, respectively. The total number of embryos evaluated was 416; 167 in the study and 249 in the control groups. Among these embryos, the MNB rate was significantly higher in the study as compared to the control group, corresponding to 19 and 8 %, respectively.

Conclusions

Blastomere multinuclearity is significantly more common in women and embryos of POR cases, defined under the Bologna criteria. Future studies are warranted to substantiate our observation that has the potential to be clinically implemented in this sub-group of women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (ART) treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pickering SJ, Taylor A, Johnson MH, Braude PR. An analysis of multinucleated blastomere formation in human embryos. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1912–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Scott L. The biological basis of non-invasive strategies for selection of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:237–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Levy R, Benchaib M, Cordonier H, Souchier C, Guerin J. Laser scanning confocal imaging of abnormal or arrested human preimplantation embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15:485–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hardarson T, Hanson C, Sjögren A, Lundin K. Human embryos with unevenly sized blastomeres have lower pregnancy and implantation rates: indications for aneuploidy and multinucleation. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:313–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, Vercruyssen M, De Neubourg D, Valkenburg M, Ryckaert G, et al. Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1062–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moriwaki T, Suganuma N, Hayakawa M, Hibi H, Katsumata Y, Oguchi H, et al. Embryo evaluation by analysing blastomere nuclei. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:152–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yakin K, Balaban B, Urman B. Impact of the presence of one or more multinucleated blastomeres on the developmental potential of the embryo to the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:243–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scott L, Finn A, O’Leary T, McLellan S, Hill J. Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and applied data for increased pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:230–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerris J, De Neubourg D, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Van de Meerssche M, Valkenburg M. Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2581–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saldeen P, Sundström P. Nuclear status of four-cell preembryos predicts implantation potential in in vitro fertilization treatment cycles. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:584–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sundström P, Saldeen P. Early embryo cleavage and day 2 mononucleation after intracytoplasmatic sperm injection for predicting embryo implantation potential in single embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:475–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pelinck MJ, Hoek A, Simons AH, Heineman MJ, van Echten-Arends J, Arts EG. Embryo quality and impact of specific embryo characteristics on ongoing implantation in unselected embryos derived from modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:527–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fauque P, Audureau E, Leandri R, Delaroche L, Assouline S, Epelboin S, et al. Is the nuclear status of an embryo an independent factor to predict its ability to develop to term? Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1299–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, De Neubourg D, Valkenburg M, Van de Meerssche M, Ryckaert G, et al. Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2345–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Holte J, Berglund L, Milton K, Garello C, Gennarelli G, Revelli A, et al. Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:548–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Agerholm IE, Hnida C, Crüger DG, Berg C, Bruun-Petersen G, Kølvraa S, et al. Nuclei size in relation to nuclear status and aneuploidy rate for 13 chromosomes in donated four cells embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25:95–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yilmaz A, Zhang L, Zhang XY, Son WY, Holzer H, Ao A. Chromosomal complement and clinical relevance of multinucleated embryos in PGD and PGS cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28:380–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:3434–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Donoso P, Staessen C, Fauser BC, Devroey P. Current value of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening in IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:15–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L, et al. ESHRE consensus on the definition of ’poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1616–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Younis JS, Ben-Ami M, Ben-Shlomo I. The Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response: a contemporary critical appraisal. J Ovarian Res. 2015;8:76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Younis JS, Radin O, Mirsky N, Izhaki I, Majara T, Bar-ami S, et al. First polar body and nucleolar precursor body morphology is related to the ovarian reserve of infertile women. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16:851–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Younis JS. The Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response; has the job been accomplished? Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1874–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Younis JS, Jadaon J, Izhaki I, Haddad S, Radin O, Bar-Ami S, et al. A simple multivariate score could predict ovarian reserve, as well as pregnancy rate, in infertile women. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:655–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Balakier H, Cadesky K. The frequency and developmental capability of human embryos containing multinucleated blastomeres. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:800–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jackson KV, Ginsburg ES, Hornstein MD, Rein MS, Clarke RN. Multinucleation in normally fertilized embryos is associated with an accelerated ovulation induction response and lower implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:60–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Baart EB, Martini E, Eijkemans MJ, Van Opstal D, Beckers NG, Verhoeff A, et al. Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:980–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Munné S, Cohen J. Unsuitability of multinucleated human blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1120–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kligman I, Benadiva C, Alikani M, Munné S. The presence of multinucleated blastomeres in human embryos is correlated with chromosomal abnormalities. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1492–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Laverge H, De Sutter P, Verschraegen-Spae MR, De Paepe A, Dhont M. Triple colour fluorescent in-situ hybridization for chromosomes X, Y and 1 on spare human embryos. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:809–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ambroggio J, Gindoff PR, Dayal MB, Khaldi R, Peak D, Frankfurter D, et al. Multinucleation of a sibling blastomere on day 2 suggests unsuitability for embryo transfer in IVF-preimplantation genetic screening cycles. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:856–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Desai N, Ploskonka S, Goodman LR, Austin C, Goldberg J, Falcone T. Analysis of embryo morphokinetics, multinucleation and cleavage anomalies using continuous time-lapse monitoring in blastocyst transfer cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Goodman LR, Goldberg J, Falcone T, Austin C, Desai N. Does the addition of time-lapse morphokinetics in the selection of embryos for transfer improve pregnancy rates? A randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:275–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gil M, D’Ommar G, Póo ME, Sosa A, Piras M, Piras R, et al. Insights on blastomere nuclearity. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24:17–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Staessen C, Van Steirteghem A. The genetic constitution of multinuclear blastomeres and their derivative daughter blastomeres. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1625–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Reproductive Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Poriya Medical Center, Tiberias, 15208, Israel

    Johnny S. Younis, Vicky Yazdi & Moshe Ben-Ami

  2. Faculty of Medicine in Galilee, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel

    Johnny S. Younis & Moshe Ben-Ami

  3. Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Ido Izhaki

Authors
  1. Johnny S. Younis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vicky Yazdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ido Izhaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Moshe Ben-Ami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johnny S. Younis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Capsule

Blastomere multinuclearity is significantly more common in women and embryos of POR cases, defined under the Bologna criteria.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 48 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Younis, J.S., Yazdi, V., Izhaki, I. et al. The association between multinucleated blastomeres and poor ovarian response under the Bologna criteria. J Assist Reprod Genet 33, 885–892 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0731-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0731-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation