Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the perinatal outcomes of patients with clinical pregnancies from ICSI treatments who had previously undergone hysteroscopic surgery to correct partial intrauterine septa and compare them to outcomes of patients with no intrauterine anomalies.
Method
A retrospective observational analysis of 2024 ultrasound confirmed pregnancies from ICSI treatments performed between January 2005 and June 2012. The patients were grouped according to their intrauterine status, and sub-grouped according to the number of fetal hearts observed; singleton control (n = 1128), twin control (n = 566), singleton septum (n = 217) and twin septum (n = 113). The primary outcomes analyzed were miscarriage, preterm, very preterm, stillbirth, vanishing twin and live delivery rates, as well as low birth weight and very low birth weight rates.
Result(s)
The live birth rate (89,9 %) in the singleton control subgroup was non-significantly higher than the live birth rate (85,3 %) in the septum subgroup, with a RR of 1,05 (p = 0,0583, 95 % CI 0,9943–1,1182) for live birth. In contrast the live birth rate (91,3 %) in twin control subgroup was significantly higher than the live birth rate (84,1 %) in the septum subgroup, with a RR 1,09 (p = 0,0282, 95 % CI 0,9988–1,1819). Non-significantly, higher miscarriage and stillbirth rates were the main contributors to the reduced live birth rates. The singleton and twin septum subgroups also had higher rates of premature and very premature delivery and LBWs and vLBW, especially in the singleton septum subgroup.
Conclusion(s)
The hysteroscopic correction of intrauterine septa may not eliminate all risks for premature delivery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Taylor E, Gomel V. The uterus and fertility. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1–16.
Homer HA, Tin-Chiu Li T-C, Cooke ID. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1–14.
Fatemi HM, Kasius JC, Timmermans A, van Disseldorp J, Fauser BC, Devroey P, et al. Prevalence of unsuspected uterine cavity abnormalities diagnosed by office hysteroscopy prior to in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1959–65.
Bosteels J, Kasius J, Weyers S, Broekmans FJ, Mol BWJ, D’Hooghe TM. Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2013; 1:Art. No.: CD009461.
Sparac V, Kupesic S, Ilijas M, Zodan T, Kurjak A. Histologic architecture and vascularization of hysteroscopically excised intrauterine septa. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8:111–6.
Ozgur K, Isikoglu M, Donme L, Oehninger S. Is hysteroscopic correction of a partial uterine septum justified prior to IVF? Reprod BioMed Online. 2007;14:335–40.
Tomazevic T, Ban-Frangez H, Ribic-Pucelj M, Premru-Srsen T, Verdenik I. Small uterine septum is an important risk variable for preterm birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;135:154–7.
Mollo A, de Franciscis P, Colacurci N, Cobellis L, Perino A, Venezia R, et al. Hysteroscopic resection of the septum improves the pregnancy rate of women with unexplained infertility: a prospective controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2628–31.
Tomazevic T, Ban-Frangez H, Virant-Klun I, Verdenik I, Pozlep B, Vrtacnik-Bokal E. Septate, subseptate and arcuate uterus decrease pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI. Reprod BioMed Online. 2010;21:700–5.
Wang J-H, Xu K-H, Jun Lin J, Chen X-Z. Hysteroscopic septum resection of complete septate uterus with cervical duplication, sparing the double cervix in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortions or infertility. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2643–9.
Taşkın EA, Berker B, Özmen B, Sönmezer M, Atabekoğlu C. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of the uterine cavity in patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:349–52.
Ozgur K, Isikoglu M. Uterine subseptus: quantification is lacking. 19th ESHRE Annual Meeting, Madrid. Hum Reprod. 2005;8 Suppl 1:117.
Gubbini G, di Spiezio SA, Nascetti D, Marra E, Spinelli M, Greco E, et al. New outpatient subclassification system for American Fertility Society classes V and VI uterine anomalies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:554–61.
Smit JG, Kasius JC, Eijkemans MJC, Veersema S, Fatemi HM, Evert JP, et al. The international agreement study on the diagnosis of the septate uterus at office hysteroscopy in infertile patients. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:2108–13.
Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio SA, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2032–44.
Hourvitz A, Lerner-Geva L, Elizur SE, Baum M, Levron J, David B, et al. Role of embryo quality in predicting early pregnancy loss following assisted reproductive technology. Reprod BioMed Online. 2006;13:504–9.
Berkkanoglu M, Ozgur K. The optimum time interval of an ICSI/ET cycle with laparoscopic tubal occlusion for hydrosalpinges. Fertil Steril. 2007;88 suppl 1:S332.
Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, Mouzon J, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Korsak V, et al. The European IVF-monitoring (EIM), and Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2571–84.
Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, Loft A, Aittomaki K, Söderström-Anttil V, et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:87–104.
Ban-Frangez H, Tomazevic T, Virant-Klun I, Verdenik I, Ribic-Pucelj N, Vrtacnik-Bokal E. The outcome of singleton pregnancies after IVF/ICSI in women before and after hysteroscopic resection of a uterine septum compared to normal controls. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146:184–7.
Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li T-C. The pattern of pregnancy loss in women with congenital uterine anomalies and recurrent miscarriage. Reprod BioMed Online. 2010;20:416–22.
Rush RW, Keirse MJ, Howat P, Baum JD, Anderson AB, Turnbull AC. Contribution of preterm delivery to perinatal mortality. Br Med J. 1976;23:965–8.
Fox NS, Roman AS, Saltzman DH, Klauser CK, Rebarber A. Twin pregnancy in patients with a uterine anomaly. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:360–4.
McCarthy FP, Khashan AS, North RA, Rahma MB, Walker JJ, Baker PN, et al. Pregnancy loss managed by cervical dilatation and curettage increases the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:3197–206.
Pundir J, Pundir V, Omanwa K, Khalaf Y, El-Toukhy T. Hysteroscopy prior to the first IVF cycle: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;28:151–61.
Jin X-Y, Kuang L, Lin X-N, Huang D, Zhang S-Y. Cervical cerclage before blastocyst transfer in patients having cryopreserved embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:392.e9–.e12.
Berghella V, Ludmir J, Simonazzi G, Owen J. Transvaginal cervical cerclage: evidence for perioperative management strategies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:181–92.
Wahabi HA, Fayed AA, Esmaeil SA, Al Zeidan RA. Progestogen for treating threatened miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;7; CD005943.
Study funding/competing interest(s)
The study was performed and manuscript prepared with no known conflicts of interest and with no financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Capsule
While hysteroscopic correction of partial septa may significantly reduce adverse perinatal outcomes, some losses most probably attributable to the pre-existance of intrauterine septa may persist, especially in cases of twin pregnancy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ozgur, K., Bulut, H., Berkkanoglu, M. et al. Perinatal outcomes in singleton and twin ICSI pregnancies following hysteroscopic correction of partial intrauterine septa. J Assist Reprod Genet 32, 533–541 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0444-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0444-z