Skip to main content
Log in

Perinatal outcomes in singleton and twin ICSI pregnancies following hysteroscopic correction of partial intrauterine septa

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the perinatal outcomes of patients with clinical pregnancies from ICSI treatments who had previously undergone hysteroscopic surgery to correct partial intrauterine septa and compare them to outcomes of patients with no intrauterine anomalies.

Method

A retrospective observational analysis of 2024 ultrasound confirmed pregnancies from ICSI treatments performed between January 2005 and June 2012. The patients were grouped according to their intrauterine status, and sub-grouped according to the number of fetal hearts observed; singleton control (n = 1128), twin control (n = 566), singleton septum (n = 217) and twin septum (n = 113). The primary outcomes analyzed were miscarriage, preterm, very preterm, stillbirth, vanishing twin and live delivery rates, as well as low birth weight and very low birth weight rates.

Result(s)

The live birth rate (89,9 %) in the singleton control subgroup was non-significantly higher than the live birth rate (85,3 %) in the septum subgroup, with a RR of 1,05 (p = 0,0583, 95 % CI 0,9943–1,1182) for live birth. In contrast the live birth rate (91,3 %) in twin control subgroup was significantly higher than the live birth rate (84,1 %) in the septum subgroup, with a RR 1,09 (p = 0,0282, 95 % CI 0,9988–1,1819). Non-significantly, higher miscarriage and stillbirth rates were the main contributors to the reduced live birth rates. The singleton and twin septum subgroups also had higher rates of premature and very premature delivery and LBWs and vLBW, especially in the singleton septum subgroup.

Conclusion(s)

The hysteroscopic correction of intrauterine septa may not eliminate all risks for premature delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taylor E, Gomel V. The uterus and fertility. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Homer HA, Tin-Chiu Li T-C, Cooke ID. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fatemi HM, Kasius JC, Timmermans A, van Disseldorp J, Fauser BC, Devroey P, et al. Prevalence of unsuspected uterine cavity abnormalities diagnosed by office hysteroscopy prior to in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1959–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosteels J, Kasius J, Weyers S, Broekmans FJ, Mol BWJ, D’Hooghe TM. Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2013; 1:Art. No.: CD009461.

  5. Sparac V, Kupesic S, Ilijas M, Zodan T, Kurjak A. Histologic architecture and vascularization of hysteroscopically excised intrauterine septa. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8:111–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozgur K, Isikoglu M, Donme L, Oehninger S. Is hysteroscopic correction of a partial uterine septum justified prior to IVF? Reprod BioMed Online. 2007;14:335–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tomazevic T, Ban-Frangez H, Ribic-Pucelj M, Premru-Srsen T, Verdenik I. Small uterine septum is an important risk variable for preterm birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;135:154–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mollo A, de Franciscis P, Colacurci N, Cobellis L, Perino A, Venezia R, et al. Hysteroscopic resection of the septum improves the pregnancy rate of women with unexplained infertility: a prospective controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2628–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tomazevic T, Ban-Frangez H, Virant-Klun I, Verdenik I, Pozlep B, Vrtacnik-Bokal E. Septate, subseptate and arcuate uterus decrease pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI. Reprod BioMed Online. 2010;21:700–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang J-H, Xu K-H, Jun Lin J, Chen X-Z. Hysteroscopic septum resection of complete septate uterus with cervical duplication, sparing the double cervix in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortions or infertility. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2643–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Taşkın EA, Berker B, Özmen B, Sönmezer M, Atabekoğlu C. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of the uterine cavity in patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:349–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozgur K, Isikoglu M. Uterine subseptus: quantification is lacking. 19th ESHRE Annual Meeting, Madrid. Hum Reprod. 2005;8 Suppl 1:117.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gubbini G, di Spiezio SA, Nascetti D, Marra E, Spinelli M, Greco E, et al. New outpatient subclassification system for American Fertility Society classes V and VI uterine anomalies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:554–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smit JG, Kasius JC, Eijkemans MJC, Veersema S, Fatemi HM, Evert JP, et al. The international agreement study on the diagnosis of the septate uterus at office hysteroscopy in infertile patients. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:2108–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio SA, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2032–44.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hourvitz A, Lerner-Geva L, Elizur SE, Baum M, Levron J, David B, et al. Role of embryo quality in predicting early pregnancy loss following assisted reproductive technology. Reprod BioMed Online. 2006;13:504–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berkkanoglu M, Ozgur K. The optimum time interval of an ICSI/ET cycle with laparoscopic tubal occlusion for hydrosalpinges. Fertil Steril. 2007;88 suppl 1:S332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, Mouzon J, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Korsak V, et al. The European IVF-monitoring (EIM), and Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2571–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, Loft A, Aittomaki K, Söderström-Anttil V, et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:87–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ban-Frangez H, Tomazevic T, Virant-Klun I, Verdenik I, Ribic-Pucelj N, Vrtacnik-Bokal E. The outcome of singleton pregnancies after IVF/ICSI in women before and after hysteroscopic resection of a uterine septum compared to normal controls. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146:184–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li T-C. The pattern of pregnancy loss in women with congenital uterine anomalies and recurrent miscarriage. Reprod BioMed Online. 2010;20:416–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rush RW, Keirse MJ, Howat P, Baum JD, Anderson AB, Turnbull AC. Contribution of preterm delivery to perinatal mortality. Br Med J. 1976;23:965–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fox NS, Roman AS, Saltzman DH, Klauser CK, Rebarber A. Twin pregnancy in patients with a uterine anomaly. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:360–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McCarthy FP, Khashan AS, North RA, Rahma MB, Walker JJ, Baker PN, et al. Pregnancy loss managed by cervical dilatation and curettage increases the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:3197–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pundir J, Pundir V, Omanwa K, Khalaf Y, El-Toukhy T. Hysteroscopy prior to the first IVF cycle: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;28:151–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jin X-Y, Kuang L, Lin X-N, Huang D, Zhang S-Y. Cervical cerclage before blastocyst transfer in patients having cryopreserved embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:392.e9–.e12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Berghella V, Ludmir J, Simonazzi G, Owen J. Transvaginal cervical cerclage: evidence for perioperative management strategies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:181–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wahabi HA, Fayed AA, Esmaeil SA, Al Zeidan RA. Progestogen for treating threatened miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;7; CD005943.

Download references

Study funding/competing interest(s)

The study was performed and manuscript prepared with no known conflicts of interest and with no financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kemal Ozgur.

Additional information

Capsule

While hysteroscopic correction of partial septa may significantly reduce adverse perinatal outcomes, some losses most probably attributable to the pre-existance of intrauterine septa may persist, especially in cases of twin pregnancy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozgur, K., Bulut, H., Berkkanoglu, M. et al. Perinatal outcomes in singleton and twin ICSI pregnancies following hysteroscopic correction of partial intrauterine septa. J Assist Reprod Genet 32, 533–541 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0444-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0444-z

Keywords

Navigation