Abstract
Purpose
Aim of this study was to investigate the association between congenital malformations and type of conception (spontaneous or medically assisted).
Methods
This is a population based study using data from the regional data base of Lombardy, a Northern Italian Region with a population of about 10 million inhabitants. Included in the study were 277,043 neonates born in Lombardy during the study period 2010-2012. Adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios (OR), and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI), of congenital abnormalities were calculated using unconditional multiple logistic regression.
Results
A total of 7057 births (2.5 %) were reported after non spontaneous conception. Overall, the frequency of birth defects was 4.4 % among births after spontaneous conception and 6.7 % among births after non spontaneous ones (OR = 1.67, 95%CI = 1.5–1.9). The association disappeared after taking into account the confounding effect of maternal age and factors associated with non spontaneous conception. The crude OR of abnormalities was higher than unity for any defect (OR = 1.67, 95%CI = 1.5–1.9), multiple defects (OR = 1.76, 95%CI = 1.3–2.3), cardiovascular (OR = 2.05, 95%CI = 1.8–2.4), musculoskeletal (OR = 2.05, 95%CI = 1.7–2.5) and metabolic system abnormalities (OR = 1.97, 95%CI = 1.1–3.5). Almost all these associations, however, disappeared after taking into account potential confounding with the exception of musculoskeletal defects (adjusted OR = 1.31, 95%CI = 1.1–1.6). In this case also, if adjustment for multiple comparison is taking into account, results did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusions
The results of this analysis confirm the recently emerging view that the increased frequency of birth defects observed after ART/medically induced ovulation only is largely due to confounders.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wen J, Jiang J, Ding C, Dai J, Liu Y, Xia Y et al. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(6):1331–7e1-4. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.053.
Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, de Klerk N, Bower C. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(4):330–53. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt006.
Simpson JL. Birth defects and assisted reproductive technologies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19(3):177–82. doi:10.1016/j.siny.2014.01.001.
Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Van Essen P, Priest K, Scott H, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1803–13. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1008095.
Van den Bergh M, Emiliani S, Biramane J, Vannin AS, Englert Y. Impact of the introduction of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) on the treatment of severe male sterility. Rev Med Brux. 1999;20(5):A453–6.
Ericson A, Kallen B. Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(3):504–9.
Isaksson R, Gissler M, Tiitinen A. Obstetric outcome among women with unexplained infertility after IVF: a matched case–control study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(7):1755–61.
Harper JC, Geraedts J, Borry P, Cornel MC, Dondorp W, Gianaroli L, et al. Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy.European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21 Suppl 2:S1–S21. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2013.219.
http://sogc.org/ The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Last Accessed on 19 May 2014.
Jaques AM, Amor DJ, Baker HW, Healy DL, Ukoumunne OC, Breheny S, et al. Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subfertile women conceiving without assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(7):2674–9. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.043.
Rimm AA, Katayama AC, Katayama KP. A meta-analysis of the impact of IVF and ICSI on major malformations after adjusting for the effect of subfertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(8):699–705. doi:10.1007/s10815-011-9583-z.
http://www.eurocat-network.eu/ European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies. Last Accessed on 19 May 2014.
Breslow NE, Day NE (1980) Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol. I. The analysis of case–control studies. IARC Scientific Publications No. 32. Lyon.
http://www.istat.it/it/ Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (Italy). Last Accessed on 19 May 2014.
Italian Registry of ART. http://www.iss.it/rpma/ Last Accessed 27 Jun 2014.
Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C. Birth defects in infants conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an alternative interpretation. BMJ. 1997;315(7118):1260–5. discussion 5–6.
Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D, Keirse MJ. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2004;328(7434):261. doi:10.1136/bmj.37957.560278.EE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Capsule We conducted a population based study, using data from Lombardy (Northern Italy) regional data base, to investigate the association between congenital malformations and type of conception (spontaneous or medically assisted). The results confirm the recently emerging view that the increased frequency of birth defects observed after ART/medically induced ovulation only is largely due to confounders.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parazzini, F., Cipriani, S., Bulfoni, G. et al. The risk of birth defects after assisted reproduction. J Assist Reprod Genet 32, 379–385 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0398-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0398-6