Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding reproducibility of human IVF traits to predict next IVF cycle outcome

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluating the failed IVF cycle often provides useful prognostic information. Before undergoing another attempt, patients experiencing an unsuccessful IVF cycle frequently request information about the probability of future success. Here, we introduced the concept of reproducibility and formulae to predict the next IVF cycle outcome.

Methods

The experimental design was based on the retrospective review of IVF cycle data from 2006 to 2013 in two different IVF centers and statistical analysis. The reproducibility coefficients (r) of IVF traits including number of oocytes retrieved, oocyte maturity, fertilization, embryo quality and pregnancy were estimated using the interclass correlation coefficient between the repeated IVF cycle measurements for the same patient by variance component analysis. The formulae were designed to predict next IVF cycle outcome.

Results

The number of oocytes retrieved from patients and their fertilization rate had the highest reproducibility coefficients (r = 0.81 ~ 0.84), which indicated a very close correlation between the first retrieval cycle and subsequent IVF cycles. Oocyte maturity and number of top quality embryos had middle level reproducibility (r = 0.38 ~ 0.76) and pregnancy rate had a relative lower reproducibility (r = 0.23 ~ 0.27). Based on these parameters, the next outcome for these IVF traits might be accurately predicted by the designed formulae.

Conclusions

The introduction of the concept of reproducibility to our human IVF program allows us to predict future IVF cycle outcomes. The traits of oocyte numbers retrieved, oocyte maturity, fertilization, and top quality embryos had higher or middle reproducibility, which provides a basis for accurate prediction of future IVF outcomes. Based on this prediction, physicians may counsel their patients or change patient’s stimulation plans, and laboratory embryologists may improve their IVF techniques accordingly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Lancaster P, Nygren KG, Sullivan E, Zegers-Hochschild F. World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization, 2000. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:1586–622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Robertson DM. Predictors of IVF outcome: markers and protocols. Women’s Health. 2006;2:385–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maheshwari A. BhattacharyaS. Johnson NP Predicting fertility Human Fertility. 2008;11:109–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Leushuis E, van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Bossuyt PMM, Eijkemans MJC, van der Veen F, et al. Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal. Human Reproduction Update. 2009;15(5):537–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisch J, Sher G, Adamowicz M, Keskintepe L. The graduated embryo score predicts the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies better than a single day 3 evaluation and achieves results associated with blastocyst transfer from day 3 embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1352–2358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Trounson AO, Gardner DK. Handbook of In Vitro Fertilization -2nd ed. CRC Press, LLC. New York. 2000; pp 68; p173-174.

  7. Carstensen B. Repeatability, Reproducibility and coefficient of variation, in comparing clinical measurement methods: A practical guide, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester. UK. 2010. doi:10.1002/9780470683019.ch9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roman RM, Wilcox CJ, Martin FG. Estimates of repeatability and heritability of productive and reproductive traits in a herd of Jersey cattle. Genetics and Mol Biol. 2000;23:113–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Loughman J. The statistical interpretation of the coefficient of repeatability. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:753–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Soullier N, Bouyer J, Pouly JL, Guibert J, de La Rochebrochard E. Estimating the success of an in vitro fertilization programme using multiple imputation. Human Reproduction. 2008;23:187–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sullivan E. Single embryo transfer reduces the risk of perinatal mortality in IVF. Medical Press 2012; http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-07-world-ivf-icsi-babies-total.html.

  12. Westhoff C, Murphy P, Heller D. Predictors of ovarian follicle number. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:624–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ireland JJ, Ward F, Jimenez-Krassel F, Ireland JLH, Smith GW, Lonergan P, et al. Follicle numbers are highly repeatable within individual animals but are inversely correlated with FSH concentrations and the proportion of good-quality embryos after ovarian stimulation in cattle. Human Reproduction. 2007;22:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Wu.

Additional information

Capsule The IVF traits including number of oocytes retrieved, maturity, fertilization and top quality embryos had high or middle reproducibility. Base on these parameters, the outcomes of these traits could be accurately predicted in next IVF cycle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, B., Shi, J., Zhao, W. et al. Understanding reproducibility of human IVF traits to predict next IVF cycle outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 31, 1323–1330 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0288-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0288-y

Keywords

Navigation