Advertisement

Retrospective clinical analysis of two artificial shrinkage methods applied prior to blastocyst vitrification on the outcome of frozen embryo transfer

  • Shanren Cao
  • Chun Zhao
  • Junqiang Zhang
  • Xun Wu
  • Xirong Guo
  • Xiufeng LingEmail author
Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Abstract

Purpose

Vitrification significantly improves the rates of blastocyst survival and clinical pregnancy following frozen embryo transfer (FET). However, ice crystal formation during the freezing process reduces the blastocyst survival rate. Artificial shrinkage (AS) prior to blastocyst vitrification decreases the formation of ice crystals, increasing the blastocyst survival rate. The aim of this study was to identify an efficient AS method to improve blastocyst survival rates following vitrification.

Method

Use of the 29-gauge needle AS and Laser pulse AS methods prior to vitrification was compared in terms of the impacts on the rates of blastocyst survival in FET cycles, blastocyst hatching, clinical pregnancy after transfer, embryo implantation, abortion, gestational duration and birth weight.

Result

In total, 438 blastocysts in 219 cycles were thawed, resulting in survival of 407 (92.9 %). Of these, 213 cycles were transferred, resulting in 129 clinical pregnancies (60.6 %) and 140 successful births. There were no differences between the two methods in the rates of blastocyst survival, clinical pregnancy, embryo implantation and abortion. However, the 29-gauge needle AS group was associated with a significantly lower blastocyst hatching rate (83.6 % vs. 91.2 %), shorter average gestational duration (37.36 ± 2.34 vs. 38.06 ± 1.76), and higher premature birth rate (40.00 % vs. 21.15 %) compared with Laser pulse AS group.

Conclusion

No significant differences in the effectiveness of the two methods applied prior to blastocyst vitrification were observed before birth, while after birth, a significantly improved clinical outcome was obtained with laser pulse AS indicating that this is a more effective pre-processing method for blastocyst vitrification.

Keywords

Laser pulse AS 29-gauge needle AS Vitrification Blastocyst Outcome 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the major science and technology of Nanjing Health Bureau and Nanjing Medical Science and Technique Development Foundation (2012sc3110029) and the Bureau of Nanjing City Science and Technology Development Fund (201201063) and the Nanjing Medical Science and Technique Development Foundation (QRX11210, QRX11211) and Open topic of State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine (SKLRM-KF-1203) and Jiangsu Key disciplines and Key personnel of Maternal and Child Health (FXK201222, FRC 201217).

References

  1. 1.
    Yokota Y, Sato S, Yokota M, Ishikawa Y, Makita M, Asada T, et al. Successful pregnancy following blastocyst vitrification: case report. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(8):1802–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Loutradi KE, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Papanikolaou EG, Pados G, Bontis I, et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(1):186–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liebermann J. Vitrification of human blastocysts: an update. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19 Suppl 4:4328.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen SU, Lee TH, Lien YR, Tsai YY, Chang LJ, Yang YS. Microsuction of blastocoelic fluid before vitrification increased survival and pregnancy of mouse expanded blastocysts, but pretreatment with the cytoskeletal stabilizer did not increase blastocyst survival. Fertil Steril. 2005;84 Suppl 2:1156–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vanderzwalmen P, Bertin G, Debauche C, Standaert V, van Roosendaal E, Vandervorst M, et al. Births after vitrification at morula and blastocyst stages: effect of artificial reduction of the blastocoelic cavity before vitrification. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(3):744–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iwayama H, Hochi S, Yamashita M. In vitro and in vivo viability of human blastocysts collapsed by laser pulse or osmotic shock prior to vitrification. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(4):355–61.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Son WY, Yoon SH, Yoon HJ, Lee SM, Lim JH. Pregnancy outcome following transfer of human blastocysts vitrified on electron microscopy grids after induced collapse of the blastocoele. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(1):137–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hur YS, Park JH, Ryu EK, Yoon HJ, Yoon SH, Hur CY, et al. Effect of artificial shrinkage on clinical outcome in fresh blastocyst transfer cycles. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2011;38(2):87–92.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mukaida T, Oka C, Goto T, Takahashi K. Artificial shrinkage of blastocoeles using either a micro-needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(12):3246–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In-vitro culture of human blastocyst. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, editors. Towards reproductive certainty: Infertility and genetics beyond. Carnforth: Parthenon Press; 1999. p. 378–88.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhu D, Zhang J, Cao S, Zhang J, Heng BC, Huang M, et al. Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles yield higher pregnancy and implantation rates compared with fresh blastocyst transfer cycles–time for a new embryo transfer strategy? Fertil Steril. 2011;95(5):1691–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tong GQ, Cao SR, Wu X, Zhang JQ, Cui J, Heng BC, et al. Clinical outcome of fresh and vitrified-warmed blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfers in ethnic Chinese ART patients. J Ovarian Res. 2012;5(1):27.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shanren Cao
    • 1
  • Chun Zhao
    • 1
  • Junqiang Zhang
    • 1
  • Xun Wu
    • 1
  • Xirong Guo
    • 1
  • Xiufeng Ling
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of ReproductionNanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations