Abstract
Purpose
Studies have shown that embryo metabolism and cell cleavage after warming vitrified embryos is faster than after thawing frozen embryos. We study vitrified embryo transfer (VET) results depending on the developmental stage of warmed embryos and the duration of progesterone treatment before embryo transfer.
Methods
We designed a prospective study, patients were randomized in two groups, starting progesterone three (D + 3) or four days (D + 4) before embryo transfer. We recruited 88 patients with embryos vitrified on day 3.
Results
We didn’t find statitistical differences in pregnancy rate when we transferred embryos in D + 3 vs D + 4 (38.2 % vs 40.5 % p ≥ 0.05). The day after warming, 54.6 % of embryos had developed to morula or early blastocyst, 32.4 % to cleavage stage and 13 % didn’t cleave. Transfers were with morula/blastocysts stage embryos (52.1 %; n:37), cleavage stage embryos (18.3 %; n:13) or mixed (29.6 %; n:21). Implantation rate was significantly higher in morula/blastocyst stage than in cleavage stage or mixed transfers (44 %, 22 % and 16.3 %; p = 0.011). Pregnancy and implantation rates were significantly higher in morula/blastocyst transfers on D + 4 than on D + 3 (68.7 % and 64.7 % vs 33.3 %, and 33.3 %, p = 0.033 and p = 0.034).
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that a majority of embryos will develop to morula/blastocyst stage after warming. VET results with morula/blastocysts, and after four days of progesterone supplementation, are better than with cleavage stage embryos.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AbdelHafez FF, Desai N, Abou-setta AM, Falcone T, Goldfarb J. Slow freezing, vitrification and ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:209–22.
Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Larman MG, Hamilton R, Gardner DK. A randomized controlled study of human day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1976–82.
Desai N, Blackmon H, Szeptycki J, Goldfarb J. Cryoloop vitrification of human day 3 cleavage-stage embryos: post-vitrification development, pregnancy outcomes and live births. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:208–13.
Desai N, AbdelHafez FF, Bedaiwy MA, Goldberg J, Falcone T, Goldfarb J. Clinical pregnancy and live birth after transfer of embryos vitrified on day 3. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:808–13.
Gordts S, Roziers P, Campo R, Noto V. Survival and pregnancy outcome after ultrarapid freezing of human embryos. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:469–72.
Martel D, Monier MN, Roche D, Psychoyos A. Hormonal dependence of pinopode formation at the uterine luminal surface. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:597–603.
Massai MR, Bergeron C, Martel D, de Ziegler D, Meduri G, Psychoyos A, Frydman R, Bouchard P. Physiological oestradiol and progesterone replacement cycles in women with ovarian failure: a model to study endometrial maturation and sex steroid receptor regulation by exogenous hormones. Hum Reprod. 1993;11:1828–34.
Milki AA, Hinckley MD, Fisch JD, Dasig D, Behr B. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with day 3 embryo transfer in similar patient populations. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:126–8.
Nawroth F, Ludwig M. What is the “ideal” duration of progesterone supplementation before the transfer of cryopreserved-thawed embryos in estrogen/progesterone replacement protocols? Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1127–34.
Nikas G, Drakakis P, Loutradis D, Mara-Skoufari C, Koumantakis E, Michalas S, Psychoyos A. Uterine pinopodes as markers of the “nidation window” in cycling women receiving exogenous oestradiol and progesterone. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1208–13.
Nikas G, Develioglu OH, Toner JP, Jones HW. Endometrial pinopodes indicate a shift in the window of receptivity in IVF cycles. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:787–92.
Pantos K, Nikas G, Makrakis E, Stavrou D, Karantzis P, Grammatis M. Clinical value of endometrial pinopodes detection in artificial donation cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;9:86–90.
Papanikolaou EG, Kolibianakis EM, Tournaye H, Venetis CA, Fatemi H, Tarlatzis B, Devroey P. Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-satage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:91–9.
Prapas Y, Prapas N, Jones EE, Duleba AJ, Olive DL, Chatziparasidou A, Vlassis G. The Windows for embryo transfer in oovyte donation cycles depends on the duration of progesterone therapy. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:720–3.
Rall WF, Fahy GM. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at −196 °C by vitrification. Nature. 1985;313:573–5.
Rama Raju GA, Haranath GB, Krishna KM, Prakash GJ, Madan K. Vitrification of human 8-cell embryos, a modified protocol for better pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:434–7.
Remohí J, Pellicer A, Simon C, Navarro J (2002). Reproducción Humana, second ed. Mc Graw Hill
Shapiro BS, Ritchter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST. A comparison of day 5 and day 6 blastocyst transfers. Fertil. Steril. 2001;75:1126–1130.
Sudoma I, Goncharova Y, Zukin V. Optimization of cryocicles by using pinopode detection in patiens with multiple implantation failure: preliminary report. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22:590–6.
Valojerdi MR, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Karimian L, Hassani F, Movaghar B. Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:347–54.
Van der Elst J, Van den Abbeel E, Vitrier S, Camus M, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Selective transfer of cryopreserved human embryos with further cleavage alter thawing increases delivery and implantation rates. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1513–21.
Ziebe S, Bech B, Petersen K, Mikkelsen AL, Gabrielsen A, Nyboe Andersen A. Resumption of mitosis during post-thaw culture: a key parameter in selecting the right embryos for transfer. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:178–81.
Declaration
The authors report no financial or commercial conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Capsule
Should we change endometrial preparation after warming D+3 embryos?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cercas, R., Villas, C., Pons, I. et al. Vitrification can modify embryo cleavage stage after warming. Should we change endometrial preparation?. J Assist Reprod Genet 29, 1363–1368 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9881-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9881-0