Predictive value of DNA integrity analysis in idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss following spontaneous conception
- 330 Downloads
Standard semen parameters are poor predictors of fertility potential. To date, apart from, paternal karyotyping sperm factors are not evaluated in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), only recent studies have emphasized the role of sperm factors in early embryonic development as sperm transcribes genes critical for early embryonic development. Sperm DNA integrity is useful diagnostic and prognostic marker and has clinical implications in idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss (iRPL) following spontaneous conception. The aim of this study was to assess DNA integrity in cases experiencing iRPL following spontaneous conception.
Semen samples from 45 patients and 20 controls were analyzed as per WHO 1999 guidelines and sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) was used to measure DNA fragmentation index (DFI).
By applying receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis, sperm DFI of approximately 26 % was found in male partner of couples experiencing iRPL.
Our data indicate that sperm from men with a history of iRPL have a higher percentage of DNA damage as compared to control group, and this can explain pregnancy loss in these patients. Men with higher DFI are infertile whereas men with lower DFI (26 %) are able to conceive but experience recurrent pregnancy loss. Thus it is important to evaluate sperm DFI in couples experiencing iRPL to understand exact aetiology of RPL and determine prognosis and management.
KeywordsIdiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss SCSA DFI Sperm
The grant and support from Department of Biotechnology (BT/PR13558/MED/30/282/2010) is highly acknowledged.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interests with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
- 2.Barratt CL, Aitken RJ, Bjorndahl L, Carrell DT, de Boer P, Kvist U, Lewis SE, Perreault SD, Perry MJ, Ramos L, Robaire B, Ward S, Zini A. Sperm DNA: organization, protection and vulnerability: from basic science to clinical applications–a position report. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(4):824–38. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bellver J, Meseguer M, Muriel L, Garcia-Herrero S, Barreto MA, Garda AL, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Garrido N. Y chromosome microdeletions, sperm DNA fragmentation and sperm oxidative stress as causes of recurrent spontaneous abortion of unknown etiology. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(7):1713–21. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq098.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Brahem S, Mehdi M, Landolsi H, Mougou S, Elghezal H, Saad A. Semen parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation as causes of recurrent pregnancy loss. Urology. 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.05.049.
- 22.Gupta S, Agarwal A, Banerjee J, Alvarez JG (2007) The role of oxidative stress in spontaneous abortion and recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 62 (5):335–347; quiz 353–334. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000261644.89300.df
- 41.Tanaka H, Iguchi N, Isotani A, Kitamura K, Toyama Y, Matsuoka Y, Onishi M, Masai K, Maekawa M, Toshimori K, Okabe M, Nishimune Y. HANP1/H1T2, A novel histone H1-like protein involved in nuclear formation and sperm fertility. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(16):7107–19. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.16.7107-7119.2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Virro MR, Larson-Cook KL, Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(5):1289–95. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
- 49.Zini A, Phillips S, Courchesne A, Boman JM, Baazeem A, Bissonnette F, Kadoch IJ, San Gabriel M. Sperm head morphology is related to high deoxyribonucleic acid stainability assessed by sperm chromatin structure assay. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(6):2495–500. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.032.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar