Skip to main content
Log in

Value of sperm chromatin dispersion test in couples with unexplained recurrent abortion

  • Gamete Biology
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate and compare standard sperm parameters and sperm chromatin integrity by sperm chromatin dispersion test (SCD) in ejaculates from men whose partners have a history of recurrent pregnancy loss and from control group of fertile men.

Methods

Thirty couples with unexplained recurrent abortion (case group) and 30 fertile couples (control group) referring to Shiraz infertility center were included. Sperm parameters were assessed in semen samples from two groups and then staining with SCD procedure. The results were analyzed by performing ANOVA and Tukey,s tests.

Results

In control group, nucleoids with big (65.93 ± 2.35), small (12.4 ± 0.60) and without halo (11.6 ± 0.50) showed significant difference with case group (41.40 ± 1.43), (21.16 ± 1.11) and (23.26 ± 1.10) respectively. In the RPL group spermatozoa with high percentage of abnormal parameters (morphology and motility) was observed (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion

This study strengthens the current literature associating sperm quality with recurrent pregnancy loss, and emphasizes the important of evaluating male factor by tests such as SCD in addition to conventional sperm parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). Recurrent pregnancy loss. Patients Fact Sheet. Created February. 2005. Available at: http://www.asrm.org/patients/FactSheet/fac.html.Accessed January 9, 2008

  2. Saxena D, Misro MM, Roy S, Chopra K, Sinha D, Nandan D, et al. Possible role of male factors in recurrent pregnancy loss. Indian J Physio Pharmacol. 2008;52(3):274–82.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agarwal A, Said TM. Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:331–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kobayashi T, Miyazaki T, Natori M, Nozava S. Protective role of superoxide dismutase in human sperm motility: superoxide dismutase activity and lipid peroxide in human semina; p;asma and spermatozoa. Human Reprod. 1991;6(7):983–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carrel DT, Liu L, Peterson CM, Jones KP, Hatasaka HH, Erikson L, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation is increased in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Arch Androl. 2003;49:49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Borini A, Tarozzi N, Bizzaro D, Bonu MA, Fava L, Flamigni C, et al. Sperm DAN fragmentation: paternal effect on early post-implantation embryo development in ART. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(11):2876–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Puscheck EE, Jevendran RS. The impact of male factor on recurrent pregnancy loss. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19:222–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernandes JL, Muriel L, Rivero MT, Goyanes V, Vasquez R, Alvarez JG. The sperm chromatin dispersion test: a simple method for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation. J Androl. 2003;24:59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fernandes JL, Muriel L, Goyanes V, Segrelles E, Gosalves J, Enciso M, et al. Simple determination of human sperm DNA fragmentation with an improved sperm chromatin dispersion test. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:833–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization. Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm cervical mucus interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FS, Lombard CJ, der Merwe JP Wan, van Zyl JA. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1986;46.

  12. Zini A, Sigman M. Are tests of DNA damage clinically useful? Pros and Cons J of Androl. 2009;30:220–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:112–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hill JA, Abbott AF, Politch JA. Sperm morphology and recurrent abortion. Fertil Steril. 1994;9:1180–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kenneth F, Trifatter JR. Abnormal sperm morphology and recurrent pregnancy loss? Fertil Steril 2007

  16. Guzick DS, Overstreet GW, Factor-Litvak P, Brazil CK, Nakajima ST, et al. National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. Sperm morphology, motility and concentration in infertile and fertile men. N Ingel J Med. 2001;345:1388–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dada R. Recurrent pregnancy loss: Male factor. In: Deka D, Malhotra N, editors. An introduction to genetics and fetal medicine. New Delhi: Jaypee Publications; 2009. p. 31–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gopalkkrishnan K, Padwal V, Meherji PK. Poor quality of sperm as it affects repeated early pregnancy loss. Arch Androl. 2000;45:111–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen C, Lee S, Chen D, Chien H, Chen I, Chu Y. Apoptosis and kinematics of ejaculated spermatozoa in patients with varicocele. J Androl. 2004;25:348–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Forouzan Absalan.

Additional information

Capsule

Sperm quality is correlated with RPL and SCD test could be a good and cost-effective method for detection of extreme degree of DNA damage.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Absalan, F., Ghannadi, A., Kazerooni, M. et al. Value of sperm chromatin dispersion test in couples with unexplained recurrent abortion. J Assist Reprod Genet 29, 11–14 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-011-9647-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-011-9647-0

Keywords

Navigation