Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this experiment is to detect effects of varying levels of sucrose on vitrified ovarian tissues.
Methods
Ovarian tissues of mice were vitrified-thawed. Mice were randomly assigned to the fresh control group and experimental groups. According to different concentration of sucrose in vitrification solution, the experimental groups were randomly divided into Group I (0.2 M sucrose), Group II (0.4 M sucrose), Group III (0.8 M sucrose) and Group IV (1.6 M sucrose). Cytology was followed throughout the oophorectomy and transplantation period. Hormone levels and density of follicle were measured 1 month after transplantation.
Results
The number of days before the resumption of estrous cycles in control group was significantly smaller than those in all of experimental groups. The serum estradiol levels of mice and the follicular density of ovarian grafts in control group were significantly higher than those in all of experimental groups. In addition, the number of days before the resumption of estrous cycles in Group II and Group III were smaller than those in Group I and Group IV. The serum estradiol levels of mice and the follicular density of ovarian grafts in Group II and Group III were significantly higher than those in Group I and Group IV. However, no difference was observed in the number of days before the resumption of estrous cycles and the serum estradiol levels between Group II and Group III. A similar follicular density was also observed in Group II and Group III.
Conclusion
Sucrose concentration of 0.4 M or 0.8 M in cryoprotective media is suitable for vitrifying mouse ovarian tissues.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Byrne J, Kessler LG, Devesa SS. The prevalence of cancer among adults in the United States. Cancer 1987;69:2154–9. doi10.1002/1097-0142(19920415)69:8<2154::AID-CNCR2820690823>3.0.CO;2-R.
Donnez J, Bassil S. Indications for cryopreservation of ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod Update 1998;4:248–59. doi:10.1093/humupd/4.3.248.
Yuswiati E, Holtz W. Work in progress: successful transfer of vitrified goat embryos. Theriogenology 1990;34:629–32. doi:10.1016/0093-691X(90)90018-O.
Ali J, Shelton JN. Design of vitrification solutions for the cryopreservation of embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1993;99:471–7. doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0990471.
Cai XY, Chen GA, Lian Y, Zheng XY, Peng HM. Cryoloop vitrification of rabbit oocytes. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1969–74. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh805.
Chian RC, Huang JYJ, Tan SL, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcome in 200 infants conceived from vitrified oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;16:608–10.
Cobo A, Pere S, Santos MJDL, Zulateguib J, Domingo J, Remohi J. Effect of different cryopreservation protocols on the metaphase II spindle in human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17:350–9.
Gidoni YS, Takefiman J, Hanael EG, et al. Cryopreservation of a mother oocytes for possible future use by her daughter with Turner syndrome: case report. Fertil Steril 2008;90:2008e9–e12.
Coticchio G, Santis LDe, Rossi G, et al. Sucrose concentration influences the rate human oocytes with normal spindle and chromosome configurations after slow-cooling cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 2006;21:1771–6. doi:10.1093/humrep/del073.
Isachenko E, Isachenko V, Rahimi G, Nawroth F. Cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue by direct plunging into liquid nitrogen. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;108:186–93.
Salehnia M. Autograft of vitrified mouse ovaries using ethylene glycol as cryoprotectant. Exp Anim 2002;51:509–12. doi:10.1538/expanim.51.509.
Sugimoto M, Maeda S, Manable N. Development of infantile rat ovaries autotransplantation after cryopreservation by vitrification. Theriogenology 2000;23:1093–103. doi:10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00255-7.
Hasegawa A, Hamada Y, Mehandjiev T, Koyama K. In vitro growth and maturation as well as fertilization of mouse preantral oocytes from vitrified ovaries. Fertil Steril 2004;81(Suppl 1):824–30.
Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, et al. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;11:608–14.
Kuleshova L, Gianaroli L, magli C, et al. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: case report. Hum Reprod 1999;14:3077–9. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.12.3077.
Huang JYJ, Chen HY, Park JYS, et al. Comparison of spindle and chromosome configuration in in vitro- and in vivo-matured mouse oocytes after vitrification. Fertil Steril 2008;90(Suppl 2):1424–32.
Rall WF. Actors affecting the survival of mouse embryos cryopreservaed by vitrification. Cryobiology 1987;24:387–402. doi:10.1016/0011-2240(87)90042-3.
Tada N, Sato M, Amann E, Ogawa S. A simple and rapid method for cryopreservation of mouse 2-cell embryos by vitrification-beneficial effect of sucrose and raffinose on their cryosurvival rate. Theriogenology 1993;40:333–44. doi:10.1016/0093-691X(93)90271-6.
Saito N, Imai K, Tomizawa M. Effect of sugars addition on survival of vitrified bovine blastocysts produced in vitro. Theriogenology 1994;41:1053–60. doi:10.1016/S0093-691X(05)80028-7.
Chen ZJ, Li M, Zhao LX, Tang R, Sheng Y. Effects of sucrose concentration on the developmental potantial of human frozen-thawed oocytes at different stages of maturity. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2345–9. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh442.
Hovatta O, Silye R, Krausz T. Cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue using dimethylsulphoxide and propanediol-sucrose as cryoprotectants. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1268–72.
Rugh R. The mouse: its reproduction and development. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990. p. 38–9.
Nisolle M, Casanas-Roux F, Qu J, Motta P, Donnez J. Histologic and ultrastructural evaluation of fresh and frozen-thawed human ovarian xenografts in nude mice. Fertil Steril 2000;74:122–9. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00548-3.
Schubert B, Canis M, Darcha C, Artonne C, Pouly JL, Dechelotte P. Human ovarian tissue from cortex surrounding benign cysts: a model to study ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1786–92. doi:10.1093/humrep/dei002.
Shaw JM, Cox SL, Trounson AO, Jenkin G. Evaluation of the long-term function of cryopreserved ovarian grafts in the mouse, implications for human applications. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000;161:103–10. doi:10.1016/S0303-7207(99)00230-0.
Kim SS, Battaglia DE, Soules MR. The future of human ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation: fertility and beyond. Fertil Steril 2001;75:1049–56. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01790-3.
Gidoni Y, Holzer H, Tulandi T, Tan SL. Fertility preservation in patients with non-oncological conditions. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;16:792–800.
Rall WF, Reid DS, Polge C. Analysis of slow-warming injury of mouse embryos by cryomicroscopical and physiochemical methods. Cryobiology 1984;21:106–21. doi:10.1016/0011-2240(84)90027-0.
Hotamisligil S, Toner M, Powers RD. Changes in membrane integrity, cytoskeletal structure, and developmental potential of murine oocytes after vitrification in ethylene glycol. Biol Reprod 1996;55:161–8. doi:10.1095/biolreprod55.1.161.
Marsella T, Xella S, Gallinelli A. Increased sucrose concentration enhances cryopreserved human ovarian tissue morphological features. Fertil Steril 2002;78(Suppl 1):129.
Marsella T, Sena P, Xella S, La-Marca A, Giulini S, De-Pol A, Volpe A, Marzona L. Human ovarian tissue cryopreservation: effect of sucrose concentration on morphological features after thawing. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;16:257–67.
Onions VJ, Mitchell MRP, Campbell BK, Webb R. Ovarian tissue viability following whole ovine ovary cryopreservation: assessing the effects of sphingosine-1-phosphate inclusion. Hum Reprod 2008;23:606–18. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem414.
Acknowledgments
Appreciation is extended to Dr Bin Cai for his review and comment and Xiao-Hua Hu from department of pathology for supporting this work.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, JM., Li, LX., Liu, XL. et al. Sucrose affecting successful transplantation of vitrified-thawed mouse ovarian tissues. J Assist Reprod Genet 26, 137–142 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-009-9295-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-009-9295-9