Skip to main content
Log in

Preconceptional diagnosis for Robertsonian translocation as an alternative to preimplantation genetic diagnosis in two situations: a pilot study

  • GENETICS
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is widely used for women heterozygous for a Robertsonian translocation. Preconceptional diagnosis (PCD), performed before fertilization, may be an alternative to PGD, especially in countries where PGD is restricted or prohibited, as in France. It could also give different information and clarify the influence of reproductive and obstetric history.

Methods

In our study, translocation was diagnosed before ICSI in five cases (group A), and after newborn or fetal aneuploidy or miscarriage in two cases, (group B).

Results

First polar body (PB1) analysis using acrocentric centromeric probes was done for 85 PB1s, and aneuploidy rate was at 42.4%. Oocyte aneuploidy rate differed (p < 0.0001) between groups A and B (30% vs 84%). Despite the small group sizes, we demonstrate a correlation (p = 0.0358) of aneuploidy rate in polar bodies after 2 or more attempts. Three live births were recorded, all in group A.

Discussion

PCD could thus be an alternative to PGD. This pilot study also provides new prognostic information taking into account the women’s natural history, but further confirmation is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Nielsen J, Wohlert M. Chromosome abnormalities found among 34,910 newborn children: results from a 13-year incidence study in Arhus. Denmark. Hum Genet 1991;87(1):81–3. doi:10.1007/BF01213097.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Verlinsky Y, Tur-kaspa I, Cieslak J, Bernal A, Morris R, Taranissi M, et al. Preimplantation testing for chromosomal disorders improves reproductive outcome of poor-prognosis patients. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;11(2):219–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goossens V, Harton G, Moutou C, Scriven PN, Traeger-Synoclino J, Sermon K, et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VIII: cycles from January to December 2005 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2006. Hum Reprod, 2008.

  4. Vialard F, Hammoud I, Molina GD, Wainer R, Bergere M, Albert M, et al. Gamete cytogenetic study in couples with implantation failure: aneuploidy rate is increased in both couple members. J Assist Reprod Genet 2008;25(11–12):539–45. doi:10.1007/s10815-008-9258-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. http://perso.wanadoo.fr/fivnat.fr/.

  6. Vialard F, Lombroso R, Bergere M, Molina GD, Hammoud I, Bailly M, et al. Oocyte aneuploidy mechanisms are different in two situations of increased chromosomal risk: older patients and patients with recurrent implantation failure after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2007;87(6):1333–9. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Montag M, van der Ven K, Dorn C, van der Ven H, et al. Outcome of laser-assisted polar body biopsy and aneuploidy testing. Reprod Biomed Online 2004;9(4):425–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moradkhani K, Puechberty J, Bhatt S, Lespinasse J, Vag P, Lefort G, et al. Rare Robertsonian translocations and meiotic behaviour: sperm FISH analysis of t(13;15) and t(14;15) translocations: a case report. Hum Reprod 2006;21(12):3193–8. doi:10.1093/humrep/del314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Page SL, Shin JC, Han Jy, Choo KH, Shaffer LG et al. Breakpoint diversity illustrates distinct mechanisms for Robertsonian translocation formation. Hum Mol Genet 1996;5(9):1279–88. doi:10.1093/hmg/5.9.1279.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Munne S. Analysis of chromosome segregation during preimplantation genetic diagnosis in both male and female translocation heterozygotes. Cytogenet Genome Res 2005;111(3–4):305–9. doi:10.1159/000086904.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Scriven PN, Flinter FA, Braude PR, Ogilvie CM, et al. Robertsonian translocations–reproductive risks and indications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 2001;16(11):2267–73. doi:10.1093/humrep/16.11.2267.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Durban M, Benet J, Boada M, Fernandez E, Calafell JM, Lailla JM, et al. PGD in female carriers of balanced Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations by first polar body analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7(6):591–602. doi:10.1093/humupd/7.6.591.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pujol A, Durban M, Benet J, Boiso I, Calafell JM, Egozcue J, Navarro J, et al. Multiple aneuploidies in the oocytes of balanced translocation carriers: a preimplantation genetic diagnosis study using first polar body. Reproduction 2003;126(6):701–11. doi:10.1530/rep.0.1260701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Alves C, Sousa M, Silva J, Barros A, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis using FISH for carriers of Robertsonian translocations: the Portuguese experience. Prenat Diagn 2002;22(12):1153–62. doi:10.1002/pd.503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vialard F, Gomes DM, Hammoud I, Bergere M, Wainer R, Bailly M, et al. Stability of aneuploidy rate in polar bodies in two cohorts from the same patient. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17(2):213–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferraretti AP, Magli MC, Kopcow L, Gianaroli L, et al. Prognostic role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in assisted reproductive technology outcome.. Hum Reprod 2004;19(3):694–9. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Munne S, Escudero T, Colls P, Xuezhong Z, Oter M, Garrisi M, et al. Predictability of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy and translocations on prospective attempts. Reprod Biomed Online 2004;9(6):645–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Engels H, Eggermann T, Caliebe A, Jelska A, Schubert R, Schuler HM, et al. Genetic counseling in Robertsonian translocations der(13;14): frequencies of reproductive outcomes and infertility in 101 pedigrees. Am J Med Genet A 2008;146A(20):2611–6. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.32500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Otani T, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly improves the pregnancy outcome of translocation carriers with a history of recurrent miscarriage and unsuccessful pregnancies. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;13(6):869–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Suzumori K. Can preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve success rates in recurrent aborters with translocations? Hum Reprod 2005;20(12):3267–70. doi:10.1093/humrep/dei259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Harris DJ, Hankins L, Begleiter ML. Reproductive risk of t(13q14q) carriers: case report and review. Am J Med Genet 1979;3(2):175–81. doi:10.1002/ajmg.1320030208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Boue A, Gallano P. A collaborative study of the segregation of inherited chromosome structural rearrangements in 1356 prenatal diagnoses. Prenat Diagn 1984;4(Spec No):45–67. doi:10.1002/pd.1970040705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Vialard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Molina Gomes, D., Hammoud, I., Bailly, M. et al. Preconceptional diagnosis for Robertsonian translocation as an alternative to preimplantation genetic diagnosis in two situations: a pilot study. J Assist Reprod Genet 26, 113–117 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-009-9293-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-009-9293-y

Keywords

Navigation