Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of the depth of embryo replacement on IVF outcome

  • Assisted Reproduction
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of the depth of embryo transfer replacement on clinical pregnancy rate.

Methods: Data from a total of 104 consecutive embryo transfers performed on 104 womenn aged 26–37 years were prospectively collected for this study. All patients underwent a standard down regulation protocol for ovarian stimulation. Oocytes retrieval were performed at 36 h after hCG administration. Embryo transfer took place at 48 h after insemination. The patients were matched in two groups according to the distance between the tip of the catheter and the uterine fundus at transfer (group A > 10 < 15 mm and group B ≤ 10 mm). The same method of loading embryos into the embryo transfer catheter was used.

Results: Clinical pregnancy rates varied significantly (p ≤ 0.05) between the two groups: 27.7% in group A and 14% in group B. The number and quality of embryos transferred did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions: The results suggest that the depth of embryo replacement may be an important variable in embryo transfer technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hearns-Stokes RM, Miller BT, Scott L. Pregnancy rate after embryo transfer depend on the provider at embryo transfer. Fert Steril 2000;74:80–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Matorras R, Urquijo E, Mendoza R, Exposito A, Rodriguez-Escudero FJ. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy rate and increases the frequency of easy transfer. Human Reprod 2002;17(7):1762–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarit Yaniv, Osnat Eitan, Ariel J, Jaffa, David Elad. Biofluid aspect of embryo transfer. Bioengineering Conference ASME 2001; BED-Vol 50, 2001.

  4. Lensy P, Killick SR, Tetlow RL, Robinson J, Maguiness SD. Embryo transfer -can we know anything new from the observation of junctional zone contraction? Human Reprod 1998;13:1540–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, Taylor S, de Ziegler D, Frydman R. Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization. Human Reprod 1998;13:1968–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goudas VT, Hammit DG, Damario MA, Session DR, Singh AP, Dumesic DA. Blood on the embryo transfer catheter is associated with decreased rates of embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy with the use of in vitro fertilation embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1998;70:878–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Alvero R, Hearns-Stokes RM, Catherino WH, Leondires MP, Segars JH. The presence of blood in the transfer catheter negatively influences outcome at embryo transfer. Human Reprod 2003;18:1848–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Egbase PE, Udo EE, al Sharahn M, Grudzinskas JG. Ptophylactic antibiotics and endocervical microbial inoculation of the endometrium at embryo transfer. Lancet 1999;354:651–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mansour R, Aboulghar M, Serour G. Dummy embryo transfer. A technique that minimize the problems of embryo transfer and improve the pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1990;54:678–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. van Weering HG, Scgats R, Mc Donnel J, Vink LM, Vermeiden JP, Hompes PG. The impact of the embryo transfer catheter on the pregnancy rate in IVF. Hum Reprod 2002;17:666–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gonen J, Dirnfeld M, Goldman S, Koifman M, Abramovici H. Does the choice of catheter for embryo transfer influence the success rate of in vitro fertilization? Hum Reprod 1991;6:1092–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meriano J, Weissman A, Greenblatt EM, Ward S, Casper RF. The choice of embryo transfer catheter affects embryo implantation after IVF. Fert Steril 2000;74:678–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Perin P, Neves P, Maluf M. The influence of two different transfer catheter on the pregnancy rate in a human in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril 1997;69:S220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Coroleu B, Carreras O, Veiga A, et al. Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rate after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2002;15:617–20.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson et al. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves outcome in patients with previousfailed in-vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril May 2002.

  16. Prapas Y, Prapas N, Hatziparasidou A, Prapa S. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results on day 3 and on day 4 embryo transfer but has no impact on day 5. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1904–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Prapas Y, Prapas N, Hatziparasidou A, Prapa S. The echoguide embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results. Acta EUR Fertil 1995;26:113–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Angelini A, Brusco GF, Barnocchi N, El-Danasouri I, Pacchiarotti A, Selman H. Impact of physician performing embryo transfer on pregnancy rate in assisted reproductive program. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006 Sep 17; [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 16983520 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

  19. Coroleu B, Barri PN, Carreras O, et al. The influence of the depth of embryo replacement in to the uterine cavity on implantation rate after IVF: A controlled, ultrasound-guided study. Hum Reprod 2002;17(2):341–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kovasc GT. What factors are important for successful embryo transfer after in-vitro fertilization? Human Reprod 1999;14:590–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Salha OH, Lamb VK, Balen AH. A postal survey of embryo transfer practice in UK. Hum Reprod 2001;16:686–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Leeton J, Trounson A, Jessup D, Wood C. The technique of human embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1982;38:156–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wood EG, Batzer FR, Go KJ, Gutman NJ, Corson SL. Ultrasound-guided soft catheter embyo transfer will improve pregnancy rate after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2000;15:107–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kan AK, Abdalla Hi, Gafar AH et al. Embryo transfer ultrasound guided versus clinical touch. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1259–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yovich JL, Turner SR, Murphy AJ. Embryo transfer technique as a cause of ectopic pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1985;44:318–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nazari A, Askari HA, et al. Embryo transfer technique as a cause of ectopic pregnancy in in-vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1993;60:919–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Meldrum DR, Chetkowski R, Steingod KA, et al. Evolution of highly successful in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril 1987;48:86–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Krampl et al. Air in the uterine cavity after embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1995;63:366–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arianna Pacchiarotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pacchiarotti, A., Mohamed, M.A., Micara, G. et al. The impact of the depth of embryo replacement on IVF outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 24, 189–193 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-007-9110-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-007-9110-4

Keywords

Navigation