Purpose : To determine whether between-trial heterogeneity in relative risk of fertilisation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) compared to in vitro fertilisation (IVF) can be explained by learning or by between-trial variation in patient characteristics.
Methods : Systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing fertilisation outcomes for ICSI and IVF (without surgical sperm retrieval). Meta-regressions to identify associations between treatment effect and trial characteristics.
Results : Coefficients on individually significant covariates from the meta-regressions confirm that the ICSI versus IVF treatment effect is increased when patients are “unsuited for IVF” but reduced as semen quality improves and when IVF insemination concentrations are increased. However, the relative risk of fertilisation varies inversely with publication date; contrary to the hypothesised learning effect.
Conclusion : While it is recognised that publication date might proxy for unobserved covariates, the possibility of a learning effect in favour of ICSI is not supported by the meta-regression.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Hall J, Fishel S: In vitro fertilization for male infertility—when and how. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1997;11(4):711–724
Payne D, Flaherty SP, Jeffrey R, Warnes GM, Matthews CD: Successful treatment of severe male factor infertility in 100 consecutive cycles using intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1994;9(11):2051–2057
Fishel S, Lisi F, Rinaldi L, Lisi R, Timson J, Green S, Hall J, Fleming S, Hunter A, Dowell K: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) versus high insemination concentration (HIC) for human conception in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev 1995;7(2):169–174
Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Armin YM: The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the treatment of patients with borderline semen. Hum Reprod 1995;10(11):2829–2830
Hamberger L, Sjögren A, Lundin K, Söderlund B, Nilsson L, Bergh C: Microfertilization techniques—the Swedish experience. Reprod Fertil Dev 1995;7(2):263–267
Calderon G, Belil I, Aran B: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional invitro fertilization: First results. Hum Reprod 1995;10(11):2835–2839
Hall J, Fishel S, Green S, Fleming S, Hunter A, Stoddart N, Dowell K, Thornton S: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus high insemination concentration invitro fertilization in cases of very severe teratozoospermia. Hum Reprod 1995;10(3):493–496
Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Sattar MA, Amin YM: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional in vitro fertilization for sibling oocytes in cases of unexplained infertility and borderline semen. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996;13(1):38–42
Pisarska MD, Casson PR, Cisneros PL, Lamb DJ, Lipshultz LI, Buster JE, Carson SA: Fertilization after standard in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in subfertile males using sibling oocytes. Fertil Steril 1999;71(4):627–632
Kastrop PM, Weima SM: Comparison between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and invitro fertilization (IVF) with high insemination concentration after total fertilization failure in a previous IVF attempt. Hum Reprod 1999;14(1):65–69
Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Staessen C, De Vos A, Vandervorst M, Van Steirteghem A: Controlled comparison of conventional invitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with asthenozoospermia. Hum Reprod 1999;14(9):2313–2319
Fishel S, Aslam I, Lisi F, Rinaldi L, Timson J, Jacobson M, Gobetz L, Green S, Campbell A, Lisi R: Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception? Hum Reprod 2000;15(6):1278–1283
Griffiths TA, Murdoch AP, Herbert M: Embryonic development in vitro is compromised by the ICSI procedure. Hum Reprod 2000;15(7):1592–1596
Plachot M, Belaisch-Allart J, Mayenga JM, Chouraqu A: Outcome of conventional IVF and ICSI on sibling oocytes in mild male factor infertility. Hum Reprod 2002;17:362–369
Tournaye H, Verheyen G, Albano C, Camus M, Van Landuyt L, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus in vitro fertilization: A randomized controlled trial and a meta-analysis of the literature. Fertil Steril 2002;78(5):1030–1037
Hershlag A, Paine T, Kvapil G, Feng H, Napolitano B: In vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection split: An insemination method to prevent fertilization failure. Fertil Steril 2002;77(2):229–232
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research draws on an assessment report (reference 06b) prepared for the Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC) of Australia. However, the views expressed herein are entirely those of the authors and are not necessarily held by the MSAC or its supporting committees. The MSAC Assessment report was prepared with the assistance of research and administrative staff at the Centres for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Economics of Monash University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mortimer, D., French, S. Can dissenting findings regarding the comparative effectiveness of ICSI and IVF be explained by a learning curve?. J Assist Reprod Genet 23, 33–36 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-9004-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-9004-2