Skip to main content
Log in

Reflections and Comments on Regulations of Biotechnologies that Touch the Beginning of Human Life

  • Occasional Opinion
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. VanDerlaan B, Karande V, Krohm C, Morris R, Pratt D, Gleicher N: Cost considerations with infertility therapy. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1200–1205

    Google Scholar 

  2. The 1987 Vatican Declaration on Reproductive Technologies.

  3. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law: I. The moral status of the pre-implantation embryo. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1046–1048

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, et al.: Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 1998;282:1145–1147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir A, Kind J, Campbell HS: Viable offspring from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 1997;385:810–813

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andrews L, Ester N: International regulation of human embryo research: Embryo research in the U.S. Hum Reprod 1998;13:l–4

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roe, et al.: vs. Wade, 410 U.S. 113. Supreme Court of the United States, January 22,1973

  8. Ethics Committee, American Society for Reproductive Medicine: Donating spare embryos for embryonic stem-cell research. Fertil Steril 2002;78:957–960

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ethics Committee, American Society for Reproductive Medicine: Disposition of abandoned embryos in ethical considerations of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 1997;67(Suppl 1):SI

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gleicher N, Karande V: Gender selection for nonmedical indications. Fertil Steril 2002;78:460–462

    Google Scholar 

  11. Katayama A: Human reproductive cloning and related techniques: An overview of the legal environment and practitioner attitudes. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001;18:442–450

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harris J: Is cloning an attack on human dignity? Nature 1997;387:754

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kass LR: Making babies revisited. Public Interest 1979;54: 32

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grazi RV, Wolowelsky JOB: The use of cryopreserved sperm and pre-embryos in contemporary Jewish law and ethics. Jewish Law Articles. Available at http://www/jlaw.com/ Articles/semen.html

  15. McWhinnie A: Gamete donation and anonymity. Should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents? Hum Reprod 2001;16:807–817

    Google Scholar 

  16. IFFS Surveillance 01: Jones HW Jr, Cohen J, eds. Marital status in ART. Fertil Steril 2001;76(Suppl 2):S11–S13

  17. Schmidt WE: ”Retirement pregnancies’’ spur a wide ethical debate. International Herald Tribune, December 30, 1993

  18. Ethics Committee, American Society for Reproductive Medicine: Oocyte donation to postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril 1997;67:25–35

    Google Scholar 

  19. German Act for the Protection of Embryos: Official Gazette 1990;1:2746

    Google Scholar 

  20. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG: Birth after the implantation of a human embryo (Letter). Lancet 1978;2:366

    Google Scholar 

  21. 1990 Human Fertilization and Embryology Act

  22. Bernat E, Vranes E: The Austrian Act on Procreative Medicine: Scope, Impact and Inconsistencies. J Assist Reprod Genet 1993;10:449–452

    Google Scholar 

  23. Adamson D: Regulation of assisted reproductive technologies in the United States. Fertil Steril 2002;78:932–942.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norbert Gleicher.

Additional information

This editorial reflects minimally edited comments, submitted by Dr. Gleicher, at the request of the Chairman of The President’s Council on Bioethics, to The Council. The here presented opinions are those of Dr. Gleicher and do not represent the opinions of either this Journal, its editorial board or its publisher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gleicher, N. Reflections and Comments on Regulations of Biotechnologies that Touch the Beginning of Human Life. J Assist Reprod Genet 22, 41–46 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-0820-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-0820-1

KEY WORDS:

Navigation