Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy of Distance Determination by Range–Intensity Correlation Methods for Nonrectangular Illuminating Pulse Shape

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Spectroscopy Aims and scope

We have analyzed the accuracy of distance determination by range–intensity correlation methods in the case of an arbitrary pulse shape. We show that the absolute error is proportional to the pulse duration τL. For a trapezoidal pulse shape, which is a reasonable approximation of the real pulse shape, we obtain an analytical estimate of the extremal error and the distance at which is it realized. The maximum error in the distance obtained in calculations with trapezoidal pulses corresponds to an extremely asymmetric pulse and is a little over 10% of the spatial pulse length τLc, where c is the speed of light. Symmetric pulses give an error due to nonrectangularity of the pulse that is smaller by a factor of ~2. Since a trapezoidal shape can qualitatively reproduce the shape of practically any real pulse, probably the trapezoidal pulse model gives an estimate of the highest possible error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. F. Gillespie, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 56, 883–887 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. I. L. Geikhman and V. G. Volkov, Principles for Improving Visibility under Adverse Conditions [in Russian], Nedra-Biznestsentr OOO, Moscow (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Andersson, Opt. Eng., 45, 034301 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Busck and H. Heiselberg, Appl. Opt., 43, 4705–4710 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Goehler and P. Lutzmann, Proc. SPIE, 7835, 783504(1–12) (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Busck, Opt. Eng., 44, 116001 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Goehler and P. Lutzmann, Proc. SPIE, 8897, 889708 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V. Kabashnikov and B. Kuntsevich, Appl. Opt., 56, No. 30, 8378–8384 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Kabashnikov and B. Kuntsevich, Proc. SPIE, 10433, 1043337 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. X. Wang, Y. Li, and Y. Zhou, Appl. Opt., 52, 7399–7046 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Laurenzis, F. Christnacher, and D. Monnin, Opt. Lett., 32, No. 21, 3146–3148 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiudad Zhang, Huimin Yan, and Yanbing Jiang, Opt. Lett., 33, No. 11, 1219 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chenfei Jin, Xiudong Sun, Yuan Zhao, Yong Zhang, and Liping Liu, Opt. Lett., 34, No. 22, 3550 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. P. Kabashnikov.

Additional information

Translated from Zhurnal Prikladnoi Spektroskopii, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 645–651, July–August, 2018.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kabashnikov, V.P., Kuntsevich, B.F. Accuracy of Distance Determination by Range–Intensity Correlation Methods for Nonrectangular Illuminating Pulse Shape. J Appl Spectrosc 85, 697–703 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-018-0707-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-018-0707-4

Keywords

Navigation