We present an analysis of the errors in measurement of the Mueller matrix elements in polarimeters that are a combination of different types of Stokes polarimeters in the detection channel and controllable polarization converters in the probing channel. As polarization converters for the probing radiation, we consider a phase plate having four different angular positions in measuring the complete Mueller matrix and a linear polarizer having different angular positions in measuring the structural parts of an incomplete 4 × 3 Mueller matrix. We have shown that the error in determining the Mueller matrix elements is distributed nonuniformly over the matrix. The nature of the error distribution over the elements and its values are different for different combinations of detection and probing channels of the polarimeter, and depend on the anisotropy of the test object. The latter dictates the choice of the optimal layout for a Mueller polarimeter for studying media with the same or different types of anisotropy and the choice of Mueller matrix elements used to solve the inverse problem of determining the anisotropy parameters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. A. Chipman, Polarimetry, Handbook of Optics II, McGraw Hill, New York (1995).
R. M. A. Azzam, Proc. SPIE, 3121, 396–405 (1997).
D. H. Goldstein, Polarized Light, 2nd. Ed., CRC Press, New York (2003).
J. J. Gil and E. Bernabeu, Optik (Stuttgart), 76, 67–71 (1987).
S.-Y. Lu and R. A. Chipman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 13, 1106–1113 (1996).
S. N. Savenkov, V. V. Marienko, E. A. Oberemok, and O. I. Sydoruk, Phys. Rev. E, 74, 056607 (2006).
A. V. Samoilov, V. S. Samoilov, A. S. Klimov, and E. A. Oberemok, Opt. Zh., 76, No. 5, 80–84 (2009).
V. A. Dlugunovich, E. A. Kruplevich, and V. N. Snopko, J. Opt. Technol., 67, No. 9, 792–800 (2000).
V. A. Dlugunovich, V. N. Snopko, and O. V. Tsaryuk, J. Opt. Technol., 68, No. 4, 269–273 (2001).
J. S. Tyo, Opt. Lett., 25, No. 16, 1198–1200 (2000).
S. N. Savenkov and K. E. Yushtin, Proc. SPIE, 5475, 81–90 (2004).
S. N. Savenkov and K. E. Yushtin, Proc. SPIE, 5158, 251–259 (2003).
D. S. Sabatke, M. R. Descour, and E. L. Dereniak, Opt. Lett., 25, No. 11, 802–804 (2000).
S. N. Savenkov, A. S. Klimov, and E. A. Oberemok, Vestn. Kievsk. Univ., Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauk, No. 1, 215–220 (2009).
P. S. Hauge and F. H. Dill, Opt. Commun., 14, 431–437 (1975).
S. N. Savenkov, Ye. A. Oberemok, O. S. Klimov, and O. I. Barchuk, J. Quantum Electron. Optoelectron, 3, 264–271 (2009).
S. N. Savenkov, Opt. Eng., 41, No. 5, 965–972 (2002).
S. N. Savenkov, V. I. Grigoruk, A. S. Klimov, E. A. Oberemok, and Yu. A. Skoblya, Zh. Prikl. Spektr., 75, No. 6, 875–881 (2008).
P. R. Bevington and D. K. Robinson, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York (2003).
H. Hurwitz and C. R. Jones, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 31, 493–499 (1941).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Zhurnal Prikladnoi Spektroskopii, Vol. 76, No. 5, pp. 784–792, September–October, 2009.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Savenkov, S.N., Klimov, A.S. & Oberemok, E.A. Error in determining Mueller matrix elements and its effect on solution of the inverse problem of polarimetry. J Appl Spectrosc 76, 743–751 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-009-9242-7
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-009-9242-7